The Structure Documents Workgroup is recording our workgroup meetings for the purpose of capturing an accurate record of discussions and decisions that go into meeting minutes. If you have concerns or objections to recording of the meeting in whole or in part, please feel free to express those concerns during the meeting so we may put the recording on hold accordingly.



To record your attendance at the SDWG Conference Call, click the sign-on button to the right:





Facilitator: Austin Kreisler

Insert @Facilitator here


Scribe: Calvin E. Beebe

Insert @Scribe here


Date:






Attendees:



To add your name to the attendance, exit Edit mode for this page and then click on the Submit button at the top of the page. Once you have submitted your attendance, the screen will indicate that you have already signed-in. Thank you!






Agenda:


2:00pm ET

  1. Call to order 
    1. Call for Attendance


      1. Please click the "Sign In" button at the top of the Agenda Page for today's meeting. Once you have signed in, it will indicate you have already signed in and place your name in the Attendees drop down list.




  2. .dot release for ODH Lori Fourquet

  3. New Comments process  (Jira Migration)- Andrew


Notes/Minutes:


  1. .dot release for ODH Lori Fourquet

    1. Valueset for occupation  - there has been developments in classification schemes, they have found databases of terms (coded) in finbads and they are choosing to include them.
      1. for past or present industry occupation, if they do not have a coded values, then they should use the original text. The question "could this change be made via valueset versioning?".  It was pointed out that it's a bit more than that, so the model needed to support a translation.
      2. The question was asked if the changes for a template could be automated.
      3. The question of how to change to STU.   An STU update was proposed, and they could extend the STU period, or to move it forward as a normative standard in the future.  The only issue related to making it forward as normative is that it is based on the C-CDA IG.
    2. : Motion to move forward with an STU Update - made by Jenny Luesman, Second Calvin Beebe,  Approve: 19, Abstain: 0 Against: 0 motion passes.
  2. New Comments process  (Jira Migration)- Andrew
    1. Andrew reviewed the Jira process that will be used by SDWG to capture contents made by users of the standards.  We have STU comment trackers, we are migrating all comments for all CDA based standards over to JIRA. This topic will be covered on Thursday at 2-4 in SDWG.

 


Copy and paste the Page properties box into the notes to record votes in the minutes. This will make them visible as decisions in the menu and easily referencable.


TypeMotion
Motion

Motion to approve 

By


Second


Date


Ref #Links to STU Comments, Documents, Tracker items, or other relevant content.
For
Neg
Abs
Status

Tally00-00-00 (For-Against-Abstain)
Discussion

Any additional discussion after the motion has been made?

ActionWho and What Follow up items need to take place after the vote?


Do not modify the box below to add your attendance for the meeting. You do not need to be in edit mode. When you are in normal view mode, there is a blue Submit button that will allow you to record your attendance. Thank you.

Sign-in sheet for Structured Documents Working Group Calls





Your Information

Name:



Anonymous Name:



E-Mail:

Organization:






<input type="checkbox" id="minutesID" name="minutes" value="Approved" style="font-size:20px">
<label for="minutesID" style="font-size:20px">Minutes Approved by Consensus</label><br>

*Tip

This is to approve minutes via general consent. "You have received the minutes. Are there any corrections to the minutes? (pause) Hearing none, if there are no objections, the minutes are approved as printed."