The Structure Documents Workgroup is recording our workgroup meetings for the purpose of capturing an accurate record of discussions and decisions that go into meeting minutes. If you have concerns or objections to recording of the meeting in whole or in part, please feel free to express those concerns during the meeting so we may put the recording on hold accordingly.



To record your attendance at the SDWG Conference Call, click the sign-on button to the right:





Facilitator: Sean McIlvenna

Insert @Facilitator here


Scribe: Calvin E. Beebe

Insert @Scribe here


Date:






Attendees:



To add your name to the attendance, exit Edit mode for this page and then click on the Submit button at the top of the page. Once you have submitted your attendance, the screen will indicate that you have already signed-in. Thank you!






Agenda:


2:00pm ET

  1. Call to order 
    1. Call for Attendance


      1. Please click the "Sign In" button at the top of the Agenda Page for today's meeting. Once you have signed in, it will indicate you have already signed in and place your name in the Attendees drop down list.




  2. Implementationathon Topics - Ex. the doc ontology for USCDI Clinical Notes

  3. C-CDA on FHIR IG / SOA Mapping


Notes/Minutes:


Minutes
  1. Implementationathon Topics - Ex. the doc ontology for USCDI Clinical Notes

    1. Expectations on the document ontology meeting that align
      1. Recommendation on what to put for the data elements for clinical notes. The following issues:
        1. On Page 7 clinical notes data elements - Consult notes, Discharge Summary, History & Physical  - there is only the generic and not the more specific terms.
          1. Create some LOINC value sets for the generic and more specific note types.  The group discussed the question if the issue was an errata or an enhancement. It was suggested that a comment be provided on OnDeck against the page that shows the single codes.  It was suggested that LOINC should be viewed as the source of truth for these valuesets.
        2. Imaging Narrative, Laboratory Narrative, Pathology Report Narrative
          1. These three categories do not align to the LOINC ontology for clinical notes.  The group discussed the question of how to code could be used.  How do we capture the narrative portions so they can be shared.  Keep clinical notes and for Imaging (imaging report codes and their section codes)
          2. Loinc document ontology will send their report to SDWG for review.
        3. Notes not called out (Procedure Note, Progress Note, )
          1. There is a large number of clinical notes that are not included in the USCDI currently and the group was thinking about submitting them.  The question about potentially adding additional LOINC codes for some of the note types called out for USCDI. 
          2. Calvin asked if there is only a requirement to share narrative documents with a loinc code.
  2. C-CDA on FHIR IG / SOA Mapping - Lisa

    1. Ken Lord Mapping between  C-CDA , FHIR and V2.  Within SOA there was a functional specification that would support transforming across the HL7 product families.   The functional specification has gone to ballot and reconciled and  an informative version has been published.  The goals of that specification MBTS.  A couple of organizations have been involved.  The goals were to have plug and play between two different information follows. 
    2. The V2 to FHIR work created a normative implementation guide between V2 to FHIR.  Some good work was done.  There are artifacts produced that were created by a number of vendors.  The spec is in ballot and the process and procedures could be leveraged for the C-CDA community to FHIR and back and forth.
    3. Ken suggested that the work undertaken by OO might be of value to to SDWG. Lisa identified that the work identified has a very interesting solution based on Spreadsheets and that if others would utilize the these kinds of maps then many others would benefit from a uniform standard for the transformations.  
    4. What is the next step?   The right place is either structured documents or the cross workgroup.  The discussion will move offline.


 


Copy and paste the Page properties box into the notes to record votes in the minutes. This will make them visible as decisions in the menu and easily referencable.


TypeMotion
Motion

Motion to approve 

By


Second


Date


Ref #Links to STU Comments, Documents, Tracker items, or other relevant content.
For
Neg
Abs
Status

Tally00-00-00 (For-Against-Abstain)
Discussion

Any additional discussion after the motion has been made?

ActionWho and What Follow up items need to take place after the vote?


Do not modify the box below to add your attendance for the meeting. You do not need to be in edit mode. When you are in normal view mode, there is a blue Submit button that will allow you to record your attendance. Thank you.

Sign-in sheet for Structured Documents Working Group Calls





Your Information

Name:



Anonymous Name:



E-Mail:

Organization:






<input type="checkbox" id="minutesID" name="minutes" value="Approved" style="font-size:20px">
<label for="minutesID" style="font-size:20px">Minutes Approved by Consensus</label><br>

*Tip

This is to approve minutes via general consent. "You have received the minutes. Are there any corrections to the minutes? (pause) Hearing none, if there are no objections, the minutes are approved as printed."