Page tree

HL7 International Logo_small Publication Request of HL7 Standards Material

Standards Material/Document - check one:

 

Normative

 

STU

 

Informative

X

STU Extension

 

Errata

 

Unballoted STU Update

 

 

 

Please use this form to submit the request to the TSC.

 

Date of this request:

2019-12-06

If you checked STU above:

Trial Use period requested for STU e.g.: One year, or other up to two years maximum (please specify):

 

If you checked STU extension above:

 

Reason for  extension, timeline, and actions according to GOM 13.02.07.02, Extending the Trial Use Period:

HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA III), Release 1 - US Realm STU 2.1 expires on December 28, 2018. This IG is currently implemented by CMS for the 2019 performance period for Eligible Professionals and Eligible Clinicians programs and will also be used for the 2020 performance period.

Original Publication Date:

July 2017

End date of the current STU period:

December 28, 2019

Length of the requested extension:

2 year

If you checked Unballoted STU Update above:

 

Describe the review process that was followed (peer review, wiki, comment ballot):

 

 

HL7 Work Group making this request and date /URL of approval minutes:

Clinical Quality Information

Approval Minutes (December 6 th , 2019):

https://confluence.hl7.org/display/CQIWC/2019-12-06+Meeting+Minutes

HL7 Product Management Group /

date / URL of approval minutes:

 

Balloted Name of the standard for which request is being made :

HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA III), Release 1 - US Realm STU 2 (PI ID – 896)

If CMET, list IDs balloted:

COCT_MTxxxxxx

 

Project Insight Number or URL of Project Scope Statement:

896

 

Document Realm:

US

Ballot cycle in which the document was successfully balloted:

2016-SEP

 

Results of that ballot (following reconciliation activities):

(not needed for errata, STU extension, or unballoted STU update)

Vote

Number

Vote

Number

 

 

 

 

Affirmative

 

Not Returned

 

Negative

 

Total in ballot pool

 

Abstentions

 

Needed for Passage

 

 

Date on which final document/standards material was supplied to HQ

2017-June-16

URL of publication material/ SVN repository and publishing facilitator:

http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=286    Publishing Facilitator: Yan Heras

Special Publication Instructions:

 

 

(not needed for STU extension or errata)

URL of ballot reconciliation document:

 

 

(not needed for STU extension or errata)

Has the Work Group posted its consideration of all comments received in its reconciliation

document on the ballot desktop? 

 

Yes

 

No

Substantive Changes Since Last Ballot?

 

Yes

 

No

 

 

 

Please provide the following information for the publication of the product brief:

 

 

Family : (select one)

  • Arden
  • CCOW
  • CDA √
  • Cross-Paradigm
  • Education
  • EHR
  • FHIR
  • V2
  • V3

 

 

Section : (select those that are applicable:)

  • Clinical and Administrative Domains √
  • EHR Profiles
  • Implementation Guides √
  • Rules and References
  • Education and Awareness

 

 

Category : (select those that are applicable:)

e.g. briefs under Clinical and Administrative Domains

e.g. briefs under Rules and References

Cardiology

CCOW

Care Provision

Data Types

Clinical Genomics

Decision Support √

Clinical Quality √

Encoding Syntax

Clinical Statement

Methodology Specifications

Community-Based Health

Security and Privacy

Decision Support √

Services

Domain Analysis Model

Specification Errata

Emergency Management

Standard Reference Materials

Financial Management

Structures

Functional Profile

Terminology

HHSFR

Transport Specifications

Laboratory

 

Materials Management

 

Medical Records

Other: (Please describe)

Nutrition Orders

Patient Administration

 

Patient Care √

 

Patient Referral

 

Personnel Management

 

Pharmacy

 

Public Health

 

Regulated Products √

 

Regulated Studies

 

Scheduling

 

Services

 

SPL

 

Other: (Please describe)

 

 

 

 

Parent standard : (e.g. the standard to which an implementation guide applies)

Clinical Document Architecture Release 2 (CDA R2)  

 

 

Update/replace standard : (e.g. is this a STU update, or is there an R1 specification which an R2 publication updates or replaces) – Please specify if this publication has a replacement, supplemental or addendum relationship to a prior standard or STU:

 

 

 

Common name/search keyword : Please specify if the publication is known by a common name internally to the Work Group or a specific search term/acronym should be provided to help users find the product.

Common Names/Aliases: QRDA III, QRDA Category III

Search Keywords: QRDA, Quality Report, Aggregated Quality Report


Description : This is typically a short paragraph summarizing the use and intent of the standard, such as would be found in an overview paragraph in the published specification.


 

 

 

Targets : These are categories of potential users, implementers, or other interested parties such as those that are indicated on the Project Scope Statement under “Stakeholders/Vendors/Providers”. Select those that are applicable, or suggest others:

Stakeholders

Vendors

Providers

Clinical and Public Health Laboratories

Pharmaceutical

Clinical and Public Health Laboratories

Immunization Registries

EHR, PHR

Emergency Services

Quality Reporting Agencies

Equipment

Local and State Departments of Health

Regulatory Agency

Health Care IT

Medical Imaging Service

Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)

Clinical Decision Support Systems

Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)

Payors

Lab

Other (specify in text box below)

Other (specify in text box below)

HIS

N/A

N/A

Other (specify below)

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

Benefits : This section will describe the benefits the standard or its implementation provides to healthcare, information technology, interoperability and the like. This section is often difficult to compose and will require careful editing by the review group(s). Please create phrases such as:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Implementations/Case Studies : This section would identify the known implementers of the standard, production or STU implementers, or any known adopters of the specification. Agencies or other organizations that sponsored the development of the specification could be listed here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development Background : This section may be used for additional important information beyond the short summary in the Description, such as would be found in an Introduction section, in the published specification.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reviewed By, and Date : (i.e. the group or individuals endorsing this product brief information and the date the endorsement was approved)

CQI WG – 6 December 2019

Email this Request to TSCPM@HL7.org and DTP@HL7.org