Attendance can be found Here
Co-Chair and Key Participant information can be found on the Agenda found Here
Reminder to complete attendace sheet.
Need a WG sponsor (not "Direct Trust").
This is being requested in multiple product families (v2 table 0201, etc.) and VSAC. Harmonization considerations.
Can the v2 value set content be drawn from multiple code systems (for example, V3 table)?
Frank - No process currently for v2 table changes in UTG to get back into the vs Access database.
For the V2 space, when V2 wants to use something from outside within a V2 artifact, the content will be the "output" of a value set.
Adding the "Direct Trust" concept would be done in one place (e.g. in a non-V2 code system), then V2 will be able to access that from the value set.
To be compatible with V2.9 and earlier, the code string length should not be longer than 3 characters
Conclusion: The expectation is that V2 will be using value set machinery for the expansions that will represent to cont
Vote: Ted Klein / Sandy Stuart: 16-0-0
Note to motion: the implication is that codes in tables may be drawn from more that one code system across more than one HL7 product silo.
Need to further discuss this Jira tracker on the Vocab Co-chair call on this coming Monday - related to vocabulary content unification discussion.
Update/Overview on what Conformance doing with FHIR
|No specific further thoughts or work on this from Conformance WG since last discussion in Sydney WGM.|
In FHIR, the question is what is meant by saying that a meaning is "scoped by" a concept in the current value set expansion.
Only use the extensible binding when you really want people to send codes from the bound value set expansion, but you know that expansion may not be complete.
We need to figure out a computable way to verify when use of extensible binding is appropriate.
Extensible bindings make sense when the expectation is that the receiver will require and be able to make use of the concepts in the categorization from the known value set expansion.
A warning may be needed when only via human review can it be determined if the code that is sent may be scoped by a concept in the bound value set.
Conformance is a tool to help you process data (in certification it is or can be more stringent).
Write words for around the idea that sending a concept outside the bound value set may be considered "non-conformant", but with the expectation of acceptance
Need additional wording for R5 to describe these considerations and make clear the limited circumstances where an extensible binding is appropriate to use.
|Next meeting||Will plan to have another joint meeting at the same time at the next WGM.|