Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Time: 3pm Eastern US

ZOOM - https://zoom.us/j/6855093136?pwd=b2lhMGxQbkxjWHFyeWVqWHkxSUR1QT09  (including audio through zoom)

Expected Attendees:

Cooper Thompson  (Epic) 2pm Central US

Drew Torres (Cerner)

Alex de Leon (Kaiser Permanente) 12pm Pacific US

Irma Jongeneel HL7 Netherlands 9pm CET Europe

Excused:

Brian Postlethwaite (Telstra Health) 5am-6am AEST

Line Saele () 9pm CET Europe

Key Upcoming Dates:

  • 2020-09 HL7 WGM & Connectathon (virtual)
  • 2020-11 FHIR DevDays Conference Amsterdam
  • 2021-01 HL7 WGM Henderson Nevada

Agenda:

  1. Social interaction: Each participant to share a positive moment/thought in these concerning times
  2. September Virtual WGM: Discussion on how this could really work for PA
  3. Encounter restructuring
  4. Tracker Items

Planned Tracker Items:

TBD...

Future Agenda Topics:

May 2020: Encounter breakdown review - attachment on this page Encounter, Condition, Procedure, Diagnosis ... (if time permits)


The WG began with the encounter restructuring. There was a question as to whether the encounter table found in Encounter, Condition, Procedure, Diagnosis ... was filled in. Could not find where, if it was filled in.

The WG continued looking at the Encounter History and Movements. The group reviewed the participation history and whether that remains as part of the Encounter, with the idea that those things that change during the span of the encounter might be pulled into another element, while static elements should stay within the encounter. The WG reviewed http://ringholm.de/docs/00810_en.htm which is a sort of white paper dealing with historic movements within HL7. The WG looked at the Encounter resource to review "movements". The WG discussed whether the convention should be to have individual Movement elements for each Encounter element that can have movements or whether there should have one for each one that can have a movement and update the status. The WG reviewed "stories" to work through what should create a "movement" record and how many should be created based on workflow scenarios. 



  • No labels