Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Publication Request

Publication Request

1. Published Name of the Standard for which request is being made

HL7 Consumer Mobile Health Application Functional Framework (cMHAFF), Release 1

2. Standards Material/Document

STU Extension

3. Date of Request

Apr 17, 2020

4. Use Period

5. Reason for extension, timeline, and actions

The project team is actively working on moving the STU to normative, but the STU has expired and due to extenuating circumstances we have not yet submitted the normative ballot yet. We are planning to submit for the September ballot cycle.

Therefore we request an extension for the CMHAFF STU while we complete this work.

6. Original Publication Date

Jun 30, 2018

7. End date of the current STU period

Jun 30, 2019

8. Length of the requested extension

2 years

9. Review Process

10. HL7 Work Group making this request and date

Mobile Health Workgroup

10a. Requesting WG Date

Apr 17, 2020

11. URL of approval minutes

12. HL7 Product Management Group

12a. Management Group Date of Approval

13. URL of approval minutes

14. Is the artifact ready for final publication?


15. If not ready, please describe remaining steps.

16. Tool name used to produce the machine processable artifacts in the IG

17. The name of the “IG artifact” within the context of the above mentioned tool.

18. Balloted Name of the standard for which request is being made

19. Requested name for published standard

20. If CMET, list IDs balloted

21. Project Insight Number


22. Document Realm


23. Ballot cycle in which the document was successfully balloted


24. Results of that ballot (following reconciliation activities):

24. Results of that ballot (following reconciliation activities):

(not needed for errata, STU extension, or unballoted STU update)

25. Affirmative

26. Negative

27. Abstentions

28. Not Returned

29. Total in ballot pool

30. Date on which final document/standards material was supplied to HQ

31. URL of publication material/ SVN repository

32. Publishing Facilitator

Matthew Graham

33. Special Publication Instructions

34. URL of ballot reconciliation document

35. Has the Work Group posted its consideration of all comments received in its reconciliation document on the ballot desktop?

36. Substantive Changes Since Last Ballot?

37. Product Brief Reviewed By

Electronic Health Records Work Group

38. Date Product Brief Reviewed

39. Has the Product Brief changed?


Product Brief

Product Brief

40. Family

41. Section

42. Topic

43. Please Describe the Topic

44. Product Type

Functional Profile

45. Parent standard

46. Parent Standard Status


47. Update/replace standard

48. Common name/search keyword

49. Description



These are categories of potential users, implementers, or other interested parties such as those that are indicated on the Project Scope Statement under “Stakeholders/Vendors/Providers”. Select those that are applicable, or suggest others:

50. Stakeholders

51. Vendors

52. Providers

53. Benefits

54. Implementations/Case Studies

55. Development Background