Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Fully reconciled spreadsheet: Ballotcomments_HL7_XPARADIGM_PAYER_SB_R1_I1_2018MAY_FULLYRECONCILED_20200331.xls

Publication Request

Publication Request

1. Published Name of the Standard for which request is being made

2. Standards Material/Document


3. Date of Request

Apr 14, 2020

4. Use Period

5. Reason for extension, timeline, and actions

6. Original Publication Date

7. End date of the current STU period

8. Length of the requested extension

9. Review Process

10. HL7 Work Group making this request and date

Payer/Provider Information Exchange

10a. Requesting WG Date

Apr 14, 2020

11. URL of approval minutes

12. HL7 Product Management Group

12a. Management Group Date of Approval

13. URL of approval minutes

14. Is the artifact ready for final publication?


15. If not ready, please describe remaining steps.

16. Tool name used to produce the machine processable artifacts in the IG

17. The name of the “IG artifact” within the context of the above mentioned tool.

18. Balloted Name of the standard for which request is being made

HL7 Cross-Paradigm Storyboard Artifact: Payer Perspective --Value-Based Care , Release 1 - US Realm (PI ID: 1347)

19. Requested name for published standard

HL7 Cross Paradigm Storyboard – Payer Perspective, Value Based Care

20. If CMET, list IDs balloted

21. Project Insight Number


22. Document Realm

US Realm

23. Ballot cycle in which the document was successfully balloted


24. Results of that ballot (following reconciliation activities):

24. Results of that ballot (following reconciliation activities):

(not needed for errata, STU extension, or unballoted STU update)

25. Affirmative


26. Negative


27. Abstentions


28. Not Returned


29. Total in ballot pool


30. Date on which final document/standards material was supplied to HQ

Apr 21, 2020

31. URL of publication material/ SVN repository

32. Publishing Facilitator

Lisa Nelson

33. Special Publication Instructions

34. URL of ballot reconciliation document

35. Has the Work Group posted its consideration of all comments received in its reconciliation document on the ballot desktop?


36. Substantive Changes Since Last Ballot?

37. Product Brief Reviewed By

Payer/Provider Information Exchange Work Group

38. Date Product Brief Reviewed

Apr 14, 2020

39. Has the Product Brief changed?

Product Brief

Product Brief

40. Family

41. Section

42. Topic

Care Provision Clinical Quality Attachments Patient Care Patient Referral

43. Please Describe the Topic

Value Based Care

44. Product Type


45. Parent standard

46. Parent Standard Status

47. Update/replace standard

48. Common name/search keyword

Cross Paradigm Storyboard Payer Perspective Value Based Care; Cross Paradigm Storyboard

49. Description

This HL7 Cross-Paradigm Storyboard Artifact establishes a realistic life situation that demonstrates healthcare information interoperability issues that are important from a Payers’ perspective and the shift toward value-based care.

The storyboard artifact is applicable across all standards paradigms. It describes a realistic care scenario which includes issues that are important to payer stakeholders within the healthcare information technology (HIT) ecosystem.



These are categories of potential users, implementers, or other interested parties such as those that are indicated on the Project Scope Statement under “Stakeholders/Vendors/Providers”. Select those that are applicable, or suggest others:

50. Stakeholders

Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), Payors

51. Vendors

EHR, PHR, Health Care IT

52. Providers

53. Benefits

- Establishes a care scenario does not change regardless what standard paradigm is used to enable interoperability.
- Enables standards development and implementations to focus efforts, align information exchange to accomplish the needs presented in the storyboard, independent of the standards paradigm.
- Exposes operational issues that exist in the “real world” where multiple standards paradigms are utilized together.
• Creates a context to aid communication about information exchange and interoperability challenges and requirements that are relevant to Payers.
• Contributes an “demonstration environment” where potential solutions can be considered and compared. It provides enough specifics to help stakeholders visualize and conceptualize the practical implications of proposed technological solutions.

54. Implementations/Case Studies

55. Development Background