Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Current »

Chair:  Jean Duteau

Scribe: Floyd Eisenberg  

Attendees

Present

Name

Affiliation

Duteau Design Inc
iParsimony LLC
Craig NewmanAltarum
The Joint Commission
MD Partners

Genevieve LuensmanCDC
Sean MuirJKM Software

(605) 313-5111

Access code: 224190#


Minutes Approved as Presented 


This is to approve minutes via general consent. "You have received the minutes. Are there any corrections to the minutes? (pause) Hearing none, if there are no objections, the minutes are approved as printed."


Agenda Topics

Agenda Outline

Agenda Item

Meeting Minutes from Discussion

Decision Link(if not child)
Management Minutes ApprovalMinutes of December 19 and January 9 meeting approved
MethodologyRoad to US Core

Road to US Core - Reviewed comments from Craig Newman. The group had significant discussion about what represents a published version of US Core, specifically when is a ballot required and when is an update (I.e., supplemental content) sufficient, or merely re-publishing with other balloted content? C-CDA allows supplements to which implementers can claim conformance without all requiring conformance to these supplements.  There is also a question about which group has ultimate approval for what is included - likely USRealm. We probably should separate what is in US Core with requirements for conformance with US Core.  For C-CDA, supplements go through testing and ultimately go normative at which point they are part of C-CDA.  Perhaps US Core can follow that example.

If a balloted project provides an IG that may be appropriate to US Core (e.g., Military History), it may not need a ballot for inclusion in US Core but there needs to be a process to make that happen.  However, if a balloted profile/set of profiles may be appropriate for US Core but with some additional constraints, a different process may be required.  The distinction is that of a fully "baked" set of content for inclusion "as is" Vs content that needs some constraint or modification to include.


BusinessUpdate on Military History ProjectApproval from USRealm Tuesday, January 21 and FMG on Wednesday, January 22.  Steering Division and TSC approval is still pending.  CGP will meet Tuesday Q2 in Sydney and this item will be on the agenda. (Note - US Realm will be meeting Tuesday, Q3).
BusinessUS Base Project

Management Next agenda

 Adjournment
 Adjourned at
  • No labels