ANSI Anti-Trust Policy: Professional Associations, such as HL7, which bring together competing entities are subject to strict scrutiny under applicable antitrust laws. HL7 recognizes that the antitrust laws were enacted to promote fairness in competition and, as such, supports laws against monopoly and restraints of trade and their enforcement. Each individual participating in HL7 meetings and conferences, regardless of venue, is responsible for knowing the contents of and adhering to the HL7 Antitrust Policy as stated in §05.01 of the Governance and Operations Manual (GOM).
Meeting Details
Date: March 10, 2023
Time: 1PM ET
Coordinates: Join Zoom meeting: https://zoom.us/j/5100467805 | Meeting ID: 510 046 7805 | +1 929-436-2866-US (New York)
Attendees:
Rob Hausam (Hausam Consulting), Marti Velezis (Sonrisa / FDA), Ralf Herzog (Roche), JD Nolen (Mercy Children's Hospital), Jose Teixeira, Andrea Pitkus (UW), Pam Banning (3M), Michael Collier (Agile Six), Joan Kegerzie (ACLA), Sara Armson (ONC), Christopher Harrison (Quest Diagnsostics), Ana Szarfman (FDA), Sheryl Taylor (NIST), Ed Heierman (Abbott), Hans Buitendijk (Oracle), Riki Merrick (Vernetzt, LLC / APHL), Kathy Walsh (Labcorp)
Co-chair: Riki Merrick
Scribe: Marti Velezis, Riki Merrick
- Quorum (Co-Chair + 4) Met
AGENDA
- Standing Topics
- Special Topics
- Workflow updates
- Diagnostic Module - Developmental Roadmap
- LIVD
- JIRAs Triage
- Other?
Meeting Minutes | Previous Meeting Notes |
---|---|
Standing Topics |
New Rule on Race/Ethnicity from OMB
Have 75 days from 1/27/2023, so due date is April 12, 2023
New Rule on Race/Ethnicity from OMB
Background:
- Federal Register :: Initial Proposals For Updating OMB's Race and Ethnicity Statistical Standards https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/27/2023-01635/initial-proposals-for-updating-ombs-race-and-ethnicity-statistical-standards
- <from prior call chat> Hans mentioned “trickle down” - the reason we had race and ethnicity terms added in HL7 started with V2 is because CDC requested Patient Administration (Chpt. 3) to add (HL7 V2.4 I think) because CDC had to conform to federal requirements. The same terms used for Census Bureau data ‘trickled over’ to other federal agencies. If this new request for comment proceeds to a new proposed then final rule, it would probably “trickle down” eventually impacting CDC, ONC, CDC (thus eventually healthcare standards) etc. See 1997 link and you will recognize correlation to HL7 V2 of race and ethnicity. Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity | The White House (archives.gov) https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards
New Rule on Race/Ethnicity from CDC
Have 75 days from 1/27/2023, so due date is April 1, 2023
PHIN VADS Hot Topics at https://phinvads.cdc.gov/vads/SearchVocab.action first mentions commenting and second gives links to documents.
NEW 4/1/2023
Comments on the CDC Race and Ethnicity Code System (CDCREC) will be accepted until April 1, 2023. Artifacts can be found by viewing the 2022_RaceAndEthnicityFinal_TablesforPub_Final. In addition, the rationale for the prepared code system is located in the Background file. For technical assistance and support concerning the updated CDCREC, please email RECODES@CDC.GOV or PHINVS@CDC.GOV mailboxes.
CDC Race Category and Ethnicity Group
List of concepts present in CDC Race Category value set which is based upon OMB recommendations and list of concepts present in Ethnicity Group value set which is based upon OMB Race & Ethnicity.
FILE: 2022_RaceAndEthnicityFinal_TablesforPub_Final.xlsx - Race and Ethnicity Download File (Full Code System, relationships, and Hierarchy codes)
FILE: 2022 Race and Ethnicity Code System_Background_Final.pdf - Background and Purpose
Update from FHIR Lab Workflow call
Need to continue working on the following:
-
FHIR-37975
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Admin reopening
- Motion to reopen the ticket due to the assignment of the disposition.
- Marti Velezis / JD Nolen : 16-0-0
- Motion to make Not Persuasive - No change to the specification is needed
- Marti Velezis / JD Nolen : 17-0-0
- Motion to reopen the ticket due to the assignment of the disposition.
- Diagnostic Module - Developmental Roadmap
- Need to revise this section of the Diagnostic module for R5 publication
- Confluence page for edits: Diagnostic Module - Developmental Roadmap
- Figure needs to be updated on the Diagnostic Module (Rob)
LIVD IG
Admin:
- In general Ed is taking Fridays off in April – maybe we can flip with specimen on Mondays 2 PM?
- Ballot will happen in September 2023 - remove from the May 2023 ballot - Rob to let Lynn know - same applies to UDI Pattern
no updated to mapping spreadsheet
- Next time for LIVD 3/24 call
Changes needed to the IG:
Update the mapping pages
Updated diagram is in the ppt – slide 11
the arrows don’t yet reflect the full picture
you can support SCT or LA-answercodes or both
you are specifying what the target is
Hans still has to update the diagram a bit more to reflect agreed upon changes
Goal of this diagram is to show the generic linkage, not at the attribute level
We also will update the text underneath this diagram
Dealing with more than 2 code systems:
For testCodes we currently only use LOINC
For resultcodes we can use either LOINC answer codes, or SCT, but each functions the same way – Abbott examples will be SCT
Looking at conceptMap in IG ResultValueConceptMap profile:
in .group – can only point to 1 code system, but we have 2 groups
conceptMap.target goes to the value set that contains values from both code systems
We are using the IICC excel representation to help folks understand what is in LIVD
And the excel FHIR representation shows how the mapping happens from the IICC excel to the FHIR resources
Do we need to open the TestCode link up to more code systems?
if yes, we could set it to at least 2, if we need it later
So far for testcodes we know of more than just LOINC like JLAC-10, SNOMED CT, C-NPU, and probably even more
but that would usually be a choice instead of using both at the same time, unlike in the case of the resultValueSet – for now leave conceptMap.group 1..1 here
- Do we need different resource profiles?
- if we constrain to the specific code system, then we would need to make different profiles for the result vs the test
- that is done in the .compose element Robert Hausam create example showing how the binding is done by creating the include statement to point to the LA codes as example
Next Steps:
- Hans Buitendijk to update and clarify the diagram and the text and bring back for review
- Hans Buitendijk to update the example mapping spreadsheet to add:
- LOINC value set for TestCode
- LOINC answer value set for ResultCode
- SNOMED value set for ResultCode
From Chat
<add chat here>
Call Adjourned at 2:12 PM ET
Next Meeting: 3/24/2023
JIRA Triage |
---|
V2 Lab JIRAs (link)
Add JIRAs for Next time – related to Lab
FHIR Lab JIRA (link)
Add JIRAs for Next time – related to Lab
Next Time:
<Add any overflow items here>