Chair: Chris Shawn 

Scribe: Mohammad Jafari 

Disclaimers

HL7 WGs are required to present the HL7 Code of Conduct & the HL7 Antitrust Statement at the beginning of each meeting:

HL7 Antitrust Policy: Professional Associations, such as HL7, which bring together competing entities are subject to strict scrutiny under applicable antitrust laws. HL7 recognizes that the antitrust laws were enacted to promote fairness in competition and, as such, supports laws against monopoly and restraints of trade and their enforcement. Each individual participating in HL7 meetings and conferences, regardless of venue, is responsible for knowing the contents of and adhering to the HL7 Antitrust Policy as stated in §05.01 of the Governance and Operations Manual (GOM).

HSSWG calls are recorded per WG approval during December 16, 2021 conference call unless an objection is sustained.

Meeting Link: https://hl7-org.zoom.us/j/9496845038

Attendees

Present

Name

Affiliation

  •  

Chris Shawn (Co-Chair)

VA
  •  
Michelle Zancan (Co-Chair)Zane Networks
  •  
Courtney Baldridge (Co-Chair)
  •  
Mohammad Jafari (Co-Chair)VA
  •  

Brian Handspicker (Co-Chair)


  •  
Ken SalyardsHHS/ACF
  •  
Joanna ThurstonHHS/ACF
  •  
Jessica BanksGoldbelt
  •  
Jasmine StewartGoldbelt
  •  
Sal RanaGoldbelt
  •  
Greg Bloom
  •  
Sean Muir
  •  
Himali Saitwal
  •  
Scott Selby
  •  
Serafina VersaggiFEI
  •  

Kristine McCoy


  •  
Samia Warsame
  •  
Ken Lord
  •  

Llew Brown


  •  

Rita Torkzadeh


  •  

Eric Jahn


  •  
Amol Vyas
  •  
John Moehrke
  •  
Teresa Gerard
  •  
Chirag Bhatt

Guests and Members:



Agenda Topics

#

Agenda Item

Discussion

Decisions / Actions

1Welcome and Quorum

Quorum = 2 co-chairs and 2 guests

  •  Attained

2Agenda Review



3

Minutes Approval

2023-01-12 HSSWG Agenda/Minutes

(Approve by general consent)


4Announcements

5

Projects and Relevant Topics

PSS-2153 - Getting issue details... STATUS Ken Lord 

  • Mohammad suggested that we look at the comments on the PSS to clarify the scope and also anticipated technical work.
  • Ken: changing the title of the project to something more specific about the intention of the project was an idea by Brian that the project team accepted. Will revise the title.
  • Ken: Michelle's comment on legal and regulatory implications of using the term 'patient'
  • Greg commented on the importance of 'relationships' and the concepts of household and community.
  • Teresa: n the field, social and legal relationships include family, household, chosen family, related persons (mother/newborn), caregivers, guardian, and custodian. Person roles: patient, client, subscriber, beneficiary, member, resident, consumer, participant, employee, enrollee, recipient, grantee, et al.
  • Ken: a recommendation for creating a domain-analysis model as part of the scope of the IG.
  • Rita asked about an analysis of the biggest supporters and dissenters in presenting the project.
  • Ken: most subject matter experts support the project.
  • Ken Salyard: the FHIR model seems to be centered around Patient.
  • Mohammad: the view of the technical people is that the Patient is just a label and the scope encompasses the other roles a person can take. We need to propose specific example of the kind of technical artifacts that the project wants to propose and the specific problems they are intended to solve.
  • Brian recommends getting into a list of technical requirements based off a use cases analysis.
  • Courtney: the current model is not aligned with social services use cases and analyzing these use cases will shine a light on how the current model is falling short.
  • Chris: Need to addressing Lloyd's comment.
  • Chris: We need to seek advice on the process whether we can modify the proposal while it's being reviewed.
6Next Meeting


Next HSS WG public call: February 16, 2023



Meeting Adjourned: 3:53 pm ET


Tasks

  • Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date