Chair:  Durwin Day Christol Green 

Scribe: Robin Isgett 

Antitrust Statement

Professional Associations, such as HL7, which bring together competing entities are subject to strict 
scrutiny under applicable antitrust laws. HL7 recognizes that the antitrust laws were enacted to promote 
fairness in competition and, as such, supports laws against monopoly and restraints of trade and their 
enforcement. Each individual participating in HL7 meetings and conferences, regardless of venue, is 
responsible for knowing the contents of and adhering to the HL7 Antitrust Policy as stated in §05.01 of 
the Governance and Operations Manual (GOM).

NOTE: This attendance applies if you are present at the related meeting/call, regardless if you have signed a different attendance for your WG. 


Minutes Approved as Presented 

This is to approve minutes via general consent. "You have received the minutes. Are there any corrections to the minutes? (pause) Hearing none, if there are no objections, the minutes are approved as printed."

Agenda Topics

Agenda Outline

Agenda Item

Meeting Minutes from Discussion

Decision Link(if not child)

Review HL7 Anti-Trust Policy

HL7 code of conduct:

Christol read Antitrust Statement.
Management Minutes Approval 08/09/22Minutes approved by consensus.
Yan HerasVBC Da Vinci Use Case.

CQI Workgroup will sponsor, since FM did not have the resources.  FM remains an interested party at this time.  Christol asked if there was provider participation and how this differs from STAR measures.  See link below for slides that answer those questions.

PERFDex - Performance Data Exchange Implementation Guide.  Alix stated that this has same risked-based aspects of Quality Measures. and helps determine financial payments.  Also, that it is performance reporting standard for burden reduction to providers.  See project description on the slide deck.  Stan asked about contracts and Yan stated that was out of scope.  Gail suggested that "standardization of payer/provider contract" be reworded.  Alix suggested "performance reporting for quality and risk contract".  After discussion, Christol asked if the workgroup wants to co-sponsor.  Rachel makes a motion for the PIE WG to co-sponsor the project.  Chris  J. seconds the motion.  Stan objects stating that providers have enough reporting to do as it is.  Mike Phillips and Mike Cabral abstain.

VOTE:  14-1-2   


New Proposals and PSS for review - PIE comments or interest

No new projects to review.


36th Annual Plenary, Working Group Meeting and FHIR Connectathon In-person only (no virtual or hybrid options)
September 17-23, 2022   •   Renaissance Harbor Place Hotel, Baltimore, MD 

  • Early bird deadline: August 26
  • COVID testing may be needed that is dated 3 days prior to WG meeting

2022 ONC Virtual Tech Forum - More information and registration link at

Reminder to add ballot comments.



Current build CDex Sept Ballot -Request Attachments review/comments:

Durwin and Chris J. volunteered to add comments in Jira by 09/11/22.  Reviewed following sections: - due date - verify LOINC code - no comment. - no comment. - no comment. - no comment. - no comment. - no comment. - see comment in link below.

CDex IG current build 1.1.0 August 2022 for September Ballot comments from PIE WG.docx 

AllOpen FloorNo discussion.
Management Next agendaAdd 3 year plan to agenda for review.
 Adjourned at 3:31 PM EST

Supporting Documents

Outline Reference

Supporting Document

Minute Approval