Call Details:

Attendees:

Agenda:

Notes/Minutes:

1. Call to order 

   1. Call for Attendance

      1. No updates for the agenda
      2. Lisa asked about adding back SDWG owned FHIR agenda item - such as
         1. Document Reference 9 Sean says OO owns it
         2. Document Manifestation - which classifies documents
         3. etc
         4. Sean says agree we should bring an agenda item back - he used to run - but has been unable to lately (plus C-DA comment review has superseded)

2. 1. 2020-10-22 Agenda and Minutes

   2. HL7
   • • RIM (Austin Kreisler) - none
     • Steering Division / TSC (Austin Kreisler) - none
     • CDA-MG (Lisa R. Nelson, Linda Michaelsen )
       • Lisa:
         • 9 new action items they need to follow up on from C-CDA IAT
         • Lisa suggest CDA Mgt group and SDWG should collaborate and have some joint planning for road mapping
         • Suggested the CDA mgt group join SDWG co-chair groupcallgroup call
           • Co-chairs suggested maybe join at the bottom of the hour starting at the bottom of the hourNov 10
     • Vocab (Rob McClure) - 
     • Publishing, Electronic Services and Tools (PEST) (Andrew Statler) - None
     • PC (Emma Jones) - 
       • NIBs submitting - Gravity
       • CDex Update
       • Negation White Paper - getting ready to republish
     • Example Task Force (https://cdasearch.hl7.org) (Brett Marquard) - will be held today
     • Call for Additional co-chair(s)
       • Announced need for additional co-chair(s)
       • Will also send a note out on list serv
3. Review Project Proposals
   1. Project Proposals Home
      1. SPL CDA to V#3 - Not interested in sponsoring - but would like to be an interested party when PSS is developed
      2. Cancer Registry Reporting - Codex - Reviewed SDWG not interested party
   2. External Updates - ONC and others 
      1. Matt Rahn - Interim for final rule (Small Rule) (https://www.healthit.gov/curesrule/download) - includes:
         1. Extending the applicability date for the Information Blocking provisions.
         2. Extending the compliance dates in the ONC
   and others
   1. 1. 1. Health IT Certification Program (Program), including certain 2015 Edition health IT certification criteria and Conditions and Maintenance of Certification requirements.
         2. Making changes to the Program by updating standards and clarifying regulatory text for specific certification criteria.
         3. Making technical corrections and clarifications.
      2. Webinar on Monday
4. Project Updates

1.  

5. C-CDA - Roadmap: Errata Updates, changes, long-term plans (From above):
   1. Lisa suggest CDA Mgt group and SDWG should collaborate and have some joint planning for road mapping
      1. Suggested the CDA mgt group join SDWG co-chair group call
      2. Co-chairs suggested maybe join at the bottom of the hour starting Nov 10
6. Additional Items
   1. Extensions
      1. Lisa said documentation doesn't seem to be done yet
         1. Benjamin said he has some work left to do
            1. Create release
            2. Put release link on confluence page (where) - Ben will figure out a prominent place and describe how to download/navigate.
         2. Lisa: extensions should be in alpha order
         3. Style sheet location - noted too
         4. Link to Release process info
   2. Reballot of C-CDA on FHIR for "Mapping Rules" esp wrt participant mappings within the resources
      1. PCWG/SD/FHIR I notes: 2020 Sept WGM Patient Care Agenda and Minutes
      2. C-CDA on FHIR R4 is finally published
      3. There are currently no resources to address mapping and no one has ownership
      4. Suggest this be added to CDA mgt group
      5. Needs to stay on our radar despite lack of sponsorship
   3. What is an "inactive" project as it relates to STU comments? Sean McIlvenna
      1. Sean - Take away the concept of "Active" vs "Inactive" until an IG is deprecated
         1. Example - Companion Guide
         2. Lisa: artifact status (active/inactive/deprecated) is different than Project status - Calvin - doesn't seem to be formal statuses for projects
         3. Sean: Would like there to be a landing page for each project to include specific parameters
         4. We all agree need to have a landing page for our projects
         5. Suggest looking at other group pages and see if anything stellar (Gay will review and point Sean to any that look good)
7. Requested STU Comments:
   1. http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail_comment.cfm?commentid=2056 (Natasha Kreisle )
      1. Re: Participant Scenario(s) - need tables or descriptions to describe how participant play in different entries types.  Not an errata - but should be "future enhancement" into a companion guide. Motion made by Lisa/Natasha seconded; Motion passed. 21/0/0
         http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail_comment.cfm?commentid=2055 (Natasha Kreisle)
      2. Link to schema in companion guide needs to be updated - Motion by Lisa/Calvin seconded - discussion from Ben about getting permalink to put in guide. Motion tabled Lisa agreed that permalink will be tabled.
8. Legal Authenticator Question (David Riddle) -
   1. how it participates in Note. concerned about relationship of document legalAuthenticator and a generic participant defined as legal authenticator. Committee says Document LegalAuthenticator is overall document, and generic participant of LA is just of that piece - say from a note pulled in.
   2. discussion to be continued next week
9. STU Comments [ Comment Tracker ]
10. 1. HL7 CDA® R2 IG: C-CDA Templates for Clinical Notes DSTU Release 2 & 2.1 - US Realm

  Adjourned 11:59 am ET

<input type="checkbox" id="minutesID" name="minutes" value="Approved" style="font-size:20px">
<label for="minutesID" style="font-size:20px">Minutes Approved by Consensus</label><br>

*Tip