Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...


  • Join Zoom Meeting

    https://zoom.us/j/91506058769

    Meeting ID: 915 0605 8769

    One tap mobile

    +13126266799,,91506058769# US (Chicago)

    +16465588656,,91506058769# US (New York)

    Meeting ID: 915 0605 8769

    Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/aguoq4RrF

    Dial by your location

            +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)

            +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)

            +1 301 715 8592 US (Germantown)

            +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)

            +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)

            +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)

    NOTE: This attendance applies if you are present at the related meeting/call, regardless if you have signed a different attendance for your WG. 

    Attendees

    peter.muir@esacinc.com

    Name

    Affiliation


    Attendance

    Brett MarquardWave One Associatesbrett@waveoneassociates.comyes
    Altarumcraig.newman@altarum.orgyes
    Health Data Incehaas@healthedatainc.comyes
    CernerHans.buitendijk@cerner.comFloyd EisenbergiParsimony, LLCFEisenberg@iParsimony.comyes
    Duteau Designjean@duteaudesign.comyesCernerMichelle.miller@cerner.comESAC
    Rob McClureMD Partnersrmcclure@mdpartners.comyes

    tmk000@gmail.comyes


    Previous Meetings: 

    Minutes Approved as Presented 

    This is to approve minutes via general consent. "You have received the minutes. Are there any corrections to the minutes? (pause) Hearing none, if there are no objections, the minutes are approved as printed."

    Agenda Topics

    Agenda Outline

    Agenda Item

    Meeting Minutes from Discussion

    Decision Link(if not child)

    ManagementMinutes accepted by acclimation (9/17 and 9/24).
    Military History Project

    Update from Military History Project team 

    Confluence page: Military Service History and Status FHIR Profiles Project Page  Document

    FHIR Connectathon 25:

    2020-09 Social History: Verification of Military Service History and Status  Consider whether the API can be used for veteran status for DaVinci use cases.

    Provided during the WGM
    US Core MUST Support Consideration Request

    Update from MUST SUPPORT discussion (Hans Buitendijk):

    During the WGM, Cross-Group Projects approved:

    • CGP agrees in principle with the FMG clarification proposed by Hans
    • Secondary guidance is specific to FHIR US Core. Cross-Project WG will recommend the statement and propose it to the US Realm Steering Committee. The statement will affect policy which is why US Realm Steering Committee has responsibility to approve the proposal.

    Further discussion about CGP US Core specific statement.


    Historical context: see  US Core MUST SUPPORT - Consider Overinterpretation


    Update to the MUST SUPPORT document reviewed and approved by US Realm Steering Committee 6 October and FMG on 7 October. Changes present on: Clarification to the Term Must Support. No definite publication date. US Core will need to determine how to apply MUST SUPPORT changes as part of an update or version and priority will be determined.

    Motion from the WGM (24 September): 

    • US Core will draft a document to live where US Realm Steering Committee determines appropriate - that is guidance about all of the MUST SUPPORT element with respect to what a sender should do and what a receiver is expected to do. Moved by Rob McClure, Seconded by Ioana Singureanu.


    Brett raised concern that evaluation on element-by-element basis requires a lot of client input (implementers) and has to deal with FHIR constraints. 

    • query-responder = server
    • query-receiver = client

    Further clarification is required for messaging and operational workflow.

    For actors A, B and C:

    A --> B--> C. If I am B do I need to store and pass along to C? - Is it display requirements and/or requirement to pass on to C.

    Currently:

    • If received, must display
    • Is it required to maintain the MUST SUPPORT data, I.e., store it and make it available for use



    US Core Path

    Path as discussed at the WGM: US_Core_Release2020_Updated_24September2020

    US Core tracker review: TBD

    Priorities:

    • Multi-reference
      • example: Provenance.agent.who is marked must support and includes 3 reference choices. 
    • Multi-datatype choice (e.g., observation.value[x]
    • Vital signs profile 

    There are 97 trackers - will create a plan and consider a block vote on 10/22 meeting and incorporate as many as possible. And will consider extra meetings at that time (I.e., weekly as needed).

    Motion for a Notice for Intent to Ballot - motion by Brett Marquard/Eric Haas: 6-0-0 approved

    Will add into the NIB site when CGP is added as a WG.



     Adjournment
    Meeting adjourned at 1:50 PM ET.

    Supporting Documents

    Outline Reference

    Supporting Document

    Minute Approval



...