...
- Mission and Roadmap discussion
- A comprehensive common logical model has been a difficult challenge
- John Donnelly - cross reference of models. CIMI is best as a horizontal service.
- Susan Matney - the details of how clinical data should be represented are not all known. We could help in this area.
- Mark Kramer - good resources for modeling, terminology, thinkers. Need to provide value to FHIR. Horizontal - cross cutting interests. Verticals - labs, pharmacy, orders, observations, ontology, etc. Critical mass - CIMI is too small. Modeling and methodology, conformance.
- Seth - help with the consistency and interoperability of clinical data using FHIR profiles
- Claude - achieve interoperability on top of FHIR, and well defined APIs that developers can implement
- Summary
- " FHIR profiling work group"?
- Horizontal group and cross cutting groups
- Use of Profile WG generated profiles is not mandatory
- Focused on a high degree ("real") interoperability - profile consistency across domains
- Create need tools
- FSH
- Macro FSH,
- Profile compare tool
- CIMI may merge with one or more other groups
- Need to investigate what Modeling and Methodology does
- We would work with within other WGs for IGs like Vitals, Pain, Skin and Wound, etc.
- Lack of resources will be a challenge
- Bootstrap to demonstrate value and generate support
- Pick a limited subdomain like lab as a first project
- Have a kickoff meeting and make a wide communication and invitation
- Pull profiles out of IGs and compare
- Find inconsistencies between profiles in different IGs
- Invite representatives from WGs to the profiling WG
- May lead to changes in how IGs are developed, selection of profiles from a library of FHIR profiles
- Action
- Stan to invite Graham to meet with CIMI
- Second meeting with broader set of HL7 and FHIR leadership
- As appropriate, meet with other WGs to gauge their support
- " FHIR profiling work group"?
- Next week: Demo of Applicadia Quadragraph - Richard
...