Meeting Minutes from Discussion
|Decision Link(if not child)|
New Call Coordinates
Join Zoom Meeting
Meeting ID: 209 701 8272
Upcoming Balloting Deadlines
September 2020 Ballot Cycle
February 21, 2020: Submit Work Group Approved PSS to the PMO
January 2021 Ballot Cycle
June 5, 2020: Submit Work Group Approved PSS to the PMO
|Should add NIB and other ballot deadlines to this and keep it as a standing agenda item|
CDS Hooks Patient View Block Vote 2 - discussion. Block vote to occur during May 6 call.
Please review items in the block vote, we will consider it for approval on the May 6th call
Co-sponsorship Request for Depression Outcomes Project:
CQI is primary, the project is seeking CDS co-sponsorship
The project is a
framework for common definitions (expressed using FHIR/QI Core and CQL) that can be leveraged by quality measures, decision support rules, etc.
AHRQ Outcome Measures Framework (OMF) to provide a common framework for describing outcomes relevant to patients and clinicians across most conditions. Stakeholder driven process. Characteristics/Treatment/Outcomes, outcome categories. Used the framework to develop measures for 5 clinical areas, developed narrative, then formalized with terminology. This project is focused on Depression outcome measures. Proposed project is to develop an implementation guide that describes how to use FHIR and CQL to describe outcome criteria, with the depression content as an example.
Question about whether it is informative vs normative track. Rationale for choosing informative is that the implementation guide is just guidance for how to construct a content ig.
If outcomes can be grouped by categories, would it be a normative statement within the IG to say that the content conforming would use these categories?
Potentially, just would want to make sure that there was a way to extend it.
There are ways within the FHIR resources/profiles to support that.
Agreed that normative track makes more sense, will update.
Recommend at least a For Comment, followed by an STU ballot one or two cycles later, followed by a Normative at least a year following the STU
Note that going Normative will mean the dependencies will all have to be normative as well
Include in the steps, connectathon testing for each of the ballots
Floyd Eisenberg moves to approve contingent on changes to timeline and normative track
Bob Dolin seconds
|Approved, see tracker for votes|
|Did not discuss, submitter not present|
FHIR Standards Roadmap Content for inclusion on CQF page:
Joints with FHIR-I:
Joints with O&O and CQI
Currently planned calls:
Virtual WGM topics:
|Did not get to this item, will consider next agenda|
EBM-on-FHIR Resource/Profile Proposals: Citation/EvidenceReport
If there's not time to get to this item, could consider an ad-hoc call or asking for some time on the CQI agenda to review (CQI would potentially have interest in the Citation resource as well) and ask CDS members to join that call in support of quorum for CDS.
|Will review next time, EBM-on-FHIR group will work on having resource proposals and a draft PR ready for review by next meeting|
|Adjournment||Adjourned at 1:00 ET|