...
| GOC Issue | Issue | Minutes 2019-02-19 | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| TBC | Can a component of a ballot may move forward as normative even if not all of the parts move forward as normative? | Essential Requirements: A component of a ballot may move forward as normative even if not all of the parts move forward as normative FHIRPath - consensus within the WG that parts of the ballot are not mature enough to move forward. Consensus that it can be published with parts that are identified ARB - re-ballot with notification that parts are normative and some not normative 2 issues:
Answer: can't go back within the same ballot and change the scope from what was included in the entire ballot Concur with ARB that the scope of the ballot was changed. Vassil: nothing in ER about change in scope.
Karen: thought could move forward parts of the specification Can there be a process to determine that the ballot status (or parts of a specification status) can be changed to a lower ballot status after the ballot closes?
| Action: This needs to go back to the FHIR Management Group or TSC for how to handle and determine if a new policy is needed. Need to consider the criteria for a substantive change.
|
| 1901001 | Co-chair elections concluded prior to the WGM. If we accept item 3 below, this becomes moot. | Deferred to the next cycle | Deferred |
| 1901002 | Co-chair emeritus. This already effectively allowed. Does this mean that (1) once you are an active emeritus it is for life? And (2) do emeritus have full co-chair rights/responsibilities. | Waiting for information from Staff on the criteria of Co-Chair emeritus. Executive Committee will be discussing 2019-02-19. Suggest that we defer this item to the next cycle. | Approved by EC Will be deferred to the next cycle |
| 1901003 | All leadership elections occur once a year. Can co-chair elect participants come to the co-chair meeting at the WGM. Should we move forward with this, we need to (1) ask the TSC to weigh in (2) determine pool of voters for co-chair voting. All on the call agree to move this forward. | Move to Peer Review | Approved by EC |
| 1901004 | Normative Ballot Proxy - Need to have a call with ANSI. | Definition of proxy in ANSI ER - focused on "written" proxy. Have precedent from ANSI that electronic document is synonymous with written documentation. Would ANSI accept electronic sign up? Don't have an answer at this point. Would be a change to the ballot instructions not ER. Add a place where balloter can assign proxy to "x" if can not be contacted when signing up for the ballot. Must be done for every ballot. Suggest we defer this work item to the next cycle and continue analysis. | Approved by EC Will be deferred to the next cycle |
| 1901005 | Merging WGs and what happens to the projects. Can they be assigned to other WG? There is enough info in the GOM to cover this, but we may wish to add some clarifying information on the forms. |
| No further action needed |
| 1901006 | Process for electing interim co-chair. Those in attendance feel it does require change to GOM. It is mentioned in the co-chair handbook, so maybe provide more clarity there. Refer to PIC | No response from PIC | Referred to PIC |
| 1901007 | GOM does not allow TSC to rapidly react to situations requiring technical decisions. Some concerns about this. Must be transparent and clear. Some distinction between the GOM being silent on an issues vs. the TSC taking action that is in conflict with the GOM. In both instances, TSC should communicate changes to GOM. Maintenance section of GOM may need to be changed. | Move to Peer Review | Approved by EC |
| 1901008 | Issue from Christol Green. This was not written up as one of our proposals but should be and responded to as other proposals submitted to GOM |
| No further action needed |
| TBD | Late Submission: Ballot Naming: https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/18292/17090/GOM%2020180426%20Final-naming%20changes%2020181105BNTF.doc | Will defer to next cycle | Deferred to next cycle |
...