...
| Quarter | Room | Size | Agenda | Hosting | Chair/Scribe (Attending) | Invitation Status | Questions/Notes/Proposed Topics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon Q1 | Salon Musset | 10 | PC Admin
| PC | Michelle/Emma | ||
| Mon Q2 | Salle De Bal East | 40 | Provenance Clinical Status IPS update (5 min) Clinical notes? | PC | Emma/Emma | SD | |
| Mon Lunch | |||||||
|
| ||||||
| Mon Q3 | Salle De Bal East | Mega Report Out | EHR | Not Applicable (Emma) | PC | ||
| Mon Q4a | FHIR Workflow | FHIR-I | Not Applicable (Michelle) | PC | |||
| Mon Q4b | Salon Kafka-Lamartine | IPS | PC | Jay/Michael | PC | ||
| Tues Q1 | Salle De Bal East | 40 | Jay Lyle confirming whether there are CIMI topics. LHS won't be attending. | PC | CIMI, EC, LHS, | ||
| Tues Q2 | Suite 728 | Cross Paradigm Transformation Service Project | SOA | Not Applicable (Emma) | PC has an extra room available: Salle De Bal East | ||
| Tues Q3 | Salle De Bal East | 30 | FHIR Admin / trackers | PC | Michelle/Michelle | Accepted: FHIR-I | |
| Tues Q4a | Salle De Bal East | 40 | PC/Vocab
(Negation ballot - may be no updates)
GF#17946 Confusion regarding 'status' and 'outcome' metadata elements of "Procedure" resource (In Person with Floyd Eisenberg / CQI) - Floyd withdrew the tracker Opiate care plan CDS Possible additions: FHIR R5 plan FHIRCast PSS Trackers:
| PC | Jay/Emma | CQI, Vocab, CIMI, OO, SD | |
| Tues Q4b | "Podiatry Functional Profile" Joint Meeting (EHR WG hosting): Attachments, CIMI, CQI, O&O, Patient Care, Pharmacy Head count does not include formally invited WGs | EHR | Decline: PC (PC did not accept and are not available) | ||||
| |||||||
| Wed Q2 | Salon Jarry (PA) | Joint with PA | PA | Not Applicable (Michelle/Emma/Michael) | PC accepted | ||
| Wed Q3 | Nutrition update | OO | Not Applicable (Jay) | CDS, SD, CQI, FHIR-I Accepted: PC | |||
| Wed Q4 | Salon C | 30 | FHIR Tracker (AdverseEvent)
| PC | Michelle/Michelle | BRR | |
| Thurs Q1 | Salle De Bal East | 40 | CarePlan report out (mega report out about all things care plan without diving into any details)
Updates Deferred
| PC | Emma/Emma | LHS, Pharm, SD | |
| Thurs Q2 | Salle De Bal East | 40 | CDA deep dive Updates on CCDA to FHIR Update on use of StructuredDefinition to represent CDA Templates Collaborative Template Review Project (CDA Management) Stewardship of clinical content (Need hearty representation from SDWG) Clinical Status (Need hearty representation from SDWG) GF#14874 Condition statuses Care Team - FHIR/CDA Alignment - CareTeam.member/participant (status, role, function, skills, etc.) | PC | Emma/Jay/Michael (Michelle attend) | SD | |
| Thurs Lunch | Salle De Bal East | 10 | Co-Chair Admin (plan next WGM agenda) Confluence info architecture | PC | Michelle/Michelle | N/A | |
| |||||||
| Thurs Q4 | Salon C (LHS) | CareTeam DAM Ballot Preparation Claude's quality criteria CareTeam CDA templates | LHS | Not Applicable (Michelle/Emma) | PC | Care Team DAM ballot pres Options are: Wed Q3 or Tues Q1 (PC/CIMI). | |
...
- Quality criteria for V2 and V2 IGs
- HL7 Version 2 Implementation Guide Quality Metrics (PC doesn't have any v2 IGs)
- Health Level Seven (HL7) Version 2 (V2) Standard Quality MetricsCriteria
- V2 Ballot Comments
- NEG (chapter 11)
- Comment on sections 11.3: Insufficient information: If the messages will be deprecated, there is specific language to be used. These messages were valid in 2.8.2,: if they are being deprecated in 2.9, the appropriate notification must be added to each message.
- Craig / Nick: 7 in favor / 0 against / 0 abstain (persuasive with mod) Reasonable to add standard deprecation language. Amit Popat What was the reason why this was deprecated? We could add a redirection to whatever chapter it was replaced with.
- Same comment on 11.8
- Amit Popat Craig Newman What does it mean that the segment WILL be deprecated? Is it deprecated in this version? If it will be deprecated in a future version, why mention that in this version?
- Comment on sections 11.3: Insufficient information: If the messages will be deprecated, there is specific language to be used. These messages were valid in 2.8.2,: if they are being deprecated in 2.9, the appropriate notification must be added to each message.
- A-T
- Craig/Emma: block vote on all affirmative typos – 6 in favor / 0 against /1 abstain
A-C (chapter 11 section 07.01) – Remove comment - does it need to be addressed?
- Craig/Sabrina – 7 in favor / 0 against /0 abstain (persuasive with mod) Remove the comment. Leave the RXA segment to be allowed to repeat for backwards compatibility, but we will add a note after the message definition indicating that it is only technically allowed to repeat. If multiple RXA segments need to be sent in a message, then a repetition of the MEDICATION_ADMINISTRATION_DETAIL should be used. Amit Popat can work with Craig Newman on the exact wording.
A-Q (chapter 12 section 03.01) – ROL is indicated as deprecated- should it have been replaced here with PRT?
- Chapter 11 has ROL deprecated, but Chapter 12 has both ROL and PRT.
- Craig / Nick : 7 in favor / 0 against / 0 abstain Refer to InM.
- No Vote classification (chapter 11 section 06.01) – This notation is not standard - fix per style guide - ROL should be marked as deprecated and the PRT segment should be a separate row
- Craig / Nick: 6 in favor / 0 against / 1 abstain Persuasive - use the standard style guide methodology
- NEG (chapter 11)
...