...
Name | Topic | Time & Constraints |
|---|---|---|
| Ballot approval steps and preparation | ||
| Postpone the meetings until comments are received. | ||
HL7 Antitrust Policy
Professional Associations, such as HL7, which bring together competing entities are subject to strict scrutiny under applicable antitrust laws. HL7 recognizes that the antitrust laws were enacted to promote fairness in competition and, as such, supports laws against monopoly and restraints of trade and their enforcement. Each individual participating in HL7 meetings and conferences, regardless of venue, is responsible for knowing the contents of and adhering to the HL7 Antitrust Policy as state in 05.01 of the Governance and Operations Manual (GOM).
...
Agenda Outline | Agenda Item | Discussion | Decisions/Updates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Review Project Planning | Public health report out. | |||||||
| 2 | Subgroups Roundup | Structural and vocabulary mapping group (PAMPI+) status | (02/13/23 Terminology "Routes" team review request. Allergy gaps review with Russ. http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/v2mappings/2020Sep/index.html CF map: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JTXVrmdWya4by2x0jJiFE8MHMPFx2-ihTQIZNwnZvuI/edit#gid=0 Negation Allergy examples were discussed in the context of the paths for the value(s) transformation. Terminology discussion planned for the Tuesday working group meeting discussion. (https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-39625) | 02/27/23-Timelines: (sign up) 03/14-21; structure docs-03/16, CGP-03/16 ; FHIR management -03/22. 02/27/23-Outstanding work 2-3 weeks:
| Not discussed | ||||
| 3 | May 2023 Ballot discussion | https://www.hl7.org/special/committees/tsc/ballotmanagement/pi_index_nibs.cfm?ProjectNumber=1122 Considerations: C-CDA or FHR FMG can be considered the same project the ballot artifacts are the same - TBD Content restraining suggestion has been made for an upcoming cycle. What is the Ballot artifact project to use? TBD FMG Discussion 2022-11-02 FMG Agenda/Minutes (Summarized by John D'Amore) Github repository https://github.com/HL7/ccda-on-fhir | Cross-group team approves the NIB (02/09/2023). Considerations: The CDA to FHIR mapping has been validated through connectathon validation, focusing on mapping C-CDA to FHIR. Only - Oracle and MDIX were working on the bi-directional implementation. | ||||||
| 4 | Ontology | Not discussed | Links https://confluence.hl7.org/display/CGP/Cross-Group+Projects+Home | Model selection topics: Provenance and Allergy. Floyd will reach out to Gay and the team. Explore ONC funding. Considering canonical concepts for the model. No updates (01/30) | |||||
| 5 | Provenance Domain Definitions Definition of Author Narrative | Not discussed | |||||||
| 6 | Qualitative and Quantitative scoring Analytics | Not discussed | Artifacts sources review. Gaps classification, minimum elements, and clinical validations. (DSS driver ) | The team has shared resources and thoughts. The initial scope has been identified - provenance and Allergies. Deloitte team ( Taima Gomez, Steve Powell, Nahom Endashaw) Another avenue has been proposed: | |||||
| 7 | HL7 SD and FHIR Connectathons | Not discussed | Connectathon information 2023 - 01 Connectathon 32 | track report out:
| |||||
| 8 | HL7 Working Group | Not discussed | Not discussed | ||||||
| 9 | Balloting Preparation | The decision process for using ConceptMap Antler (condition syntax tool for running languages) vs fhirpath - why both. https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/v2-to-fhir/mapping_guidelines.html Stating spec (e.g., cardinality) in map vs. linking – reader convenience? cardinality is included in the maps when you have required on one side [IG Shorthand links broken but in git] Relations between fsh, json, & html > Map pages have two sections; is one from csv & one from ConceptMap? > FSH has fewer entries than the table (which has blank rows). Who is using this and for what purpose? Any feedback? | An antler style has been preferred. Concept maps play an important role in the V2-FHIR project as they help to address similarities and differences between FHIR 5 and FHIR 4 concepts i.e., role codes or participation codes, or other attributes. Also, specs like cardinality and optionality fields are important to include on both sides of the map as they are maybe different for FHIR and V2. https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/v2-to-fhir/ The most updated maps:
Potential CDC collaboration. NIB draft | All necessary approvals were received from 3 teams: May NIB DraftC-CDA to FHIR publication: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/us/ccda/the_specification.html https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/ccda-on-fhir/branches/Feb2023 Contributing to C-CDA to FHIR (and back) Implementation Guide John D'Amore knowledge transfer: Guide: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11TuhrdUH1GA5EHI38x27NgsFZaFM5hYXCcBeM-agOVo/edit Recording: https://hl7-org.zoom.us/rec/share/kbU0qz-AiHHLoT0gurxoWK5lOWONNNFsrHIUEsAGdVcwSdPGUxSdBiNg-f9gAijg.clFi4-Cgr3Fm-wbH |
Parking Lot topics for the future:
...