- VP asked whether a ballot reconciliation spreadsheet is needed - the publication instructions specify that it is. MD noted that this spreadsheet is no longer relevant since Jira is being used for tickets. MD to update the instructions to remove this.
- VP asked RL who needs to reach out to negative voters during the ballot cycle (the instructions state that the co-chair needs to reach out to voters to request that they withdraw negative votes). RL notes noted this has been a function of the ballot desktop in the past and it still works this way. RL to follow through with this. MD notes that in Jira there is a possibility to withdraw negative votes (CM confirms). CM asked whether publication is contingent upon negative votes being withdrawn. MD to ask Lynn Laakso. VP notes noted that we only received 2 negative votes out of many positive votes, so percentage-wise there is no issue.
- VP requested feedback on whether the IG contains all the necessary information.
- Previously the version number 1.0-ballot and it is now 1.0.0. The IG Standards Status is Trial Use, the Maturity Level is set at 2 (since we have been to 2 Connectathons and 1 ballot). MD confirmed this is to be correct.
- Sushi-config: version is 1.0.0, and the release label is Trial Use. In the publication request, it now states version 2. aligned with sushi. MD confirms confirmed that this looks looked correct, but notes noted that the path should also contain 1.0.0 instead of 2023Jan.
- The QA has a warning that the release is not labeled labelled as a milestone so it must have a patch version . We (which we do not want a patch version). MD suggested changing it to Mode: milestone.
- VP notes noted that there are were no other issues, other than that we have to update in HL7 Jira spec artifacts. VP has submitted the draft pull request and will submit a proper one after sorting completing any remaining work.
- MD noted that the publication request on confluence should be completed, then it should be added to the FMG agenda for their approval by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. Once FMG approves it, the publication request will automatically be sent to TSC for their approval (handled by FMG). Lynn Laakso is notified once TSC approves it, then the publication will happen.
- All content has now been completed for the IG, except the diagram which shows the relationships between all profiles (this is informative rather than normative. RL confirmed that we are fine to go ahead with intent to publish).
- VP motioned to go ahead with the request to publish. CM seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0-0.
- CM asked how we notify the WG that the content is ready for their review. UD to send out a message (via CIC listserv). MD noted that we need to give them 2 weeks to review the content then have a vote in the WG call to approve the content. CM discussed aiming for this vote to be held on Thursday, April 13th. Following CIC WG approval, the content then goes to the FMG (UD to request for this to be added to the FMG agenda following the April 13th call).