| 5 | Projects and Relevant Topics | | Jira |
|---|
| server | Jira |
|---|
| serverId | 9b965702-34a7-3433-bf10-7f66fd69238c |
|---|
| key | PSS-2153 |
|---|
|
Ken Lord | - Mohammad suggested that we look at the comments on the PSS to clarify the scope and also anticipated technical work.
- Ken: changing the title of the project to something more specific about the intention of the project was an idea by Brian that the project team accepted. Will revise the title.
- Ken: Michelle's comment on legal and regulatory implications of using the term 'patient'
- Greg commented on the importance of 'relationships' and the concepts of household and community.
- Teresa: n the field, social and legal relationships include family, household, chosen family, related persons (mother/newborn), caregivers, guardian, and custodian. Person roles: patient, client, subscriber, beneficiary, member, resident, consumer, participant, employee, enrollee, recipient, grantee, et al.
- Ken: a recommendation for creating a domain-analysis model as part of the scope of the IG.
- Rita asked about an analysis of the biggest supporters and dissenters in presenting the project.
- Ken: most subject matter experts support the project.
- Ken Salyard: the FHIR model seems to be centered around Patient.
- Mohammad: the view of the technical people is that the Patient is just a label and the scope encompasses the other roles a person can take. We need to propose specific example of the kind of technical artifacts that the project wants to propose and the specific problems they are intended to solve.
- Brian recommends getting into a list of technical requirements based off a use cases analysis.
- Courtney: the current model is not aligned with social services use cases and analyzing these use cases will shine a light on how the current model is falling short.
- Chris: Need to addressing Lloyd's comment.
- Chris: We need to seek advice on the process whether we can modify the proposal while it's being reviewed.
|
