...
Todd Cooper Marti Velezis Martin Rosner Andy Iverson Stefan Karl Javier Espina Marti Velezis
Notes
- Status Update on PSS-1980 & PSS-2005
- Although the DEV WG approved both PSS's last week to progress to Consensus Review, one other step needed to be completed - a step that was not obvious to both Todd Cooper & John Rhoads
- John noted approval in the Comments for both PSS'; however, it was not seen that a new "Devices" entry was added to each PSS Sub-Tasks section. This task required us to "agree" to send the document to Consensus Review and to provide the link for when the WG decision was made (and documented).
- With that done, both PSSs have transitioned to "Consensus-Review" workflow state
- Closing date for both is
- QUESTION: Martin asked what if the co-sponsor WG's (who are also called out in the Sub-Tasks section) don't respond by then?
- A Project Proposals & PSS FAQ provides the answer! (the TSC takes care of it)
- This led to the following tutorial from Marti relating how OO kept track of WG-related Proposals and PSSs ...
- Tutorial on HL7 WG Tracking of Project & PSS Proposals & Obligations
- Marti provided an overview of how the OO WG keeps track of both project proposals and PSSs that are in its scope of interest ...
- OO maintains (manually) OO Project Proposal Triage, which is reviewed each week for any changes
- Content for this page is culled from both Project Proposals Home and Project Scope Statement both with appropriate filters to see what is relevant (e.g., "In Review")
- Note that on the PSS page, both the current 2005 & 1980 projects are listed as in "Consensus Review" with the open/close dates and the Sponsoring WG ... pretty sweet
- The "Proposal Triage" page is maintained by one of the co-chairs
- PROPOSAL: Devices should consider something similar and include it as a standing agenda item. Note that this would require someone to agree to "own" that agenda topic and prep for the discussions
- Marti provided an overview of how the OO WG keeps track of both project proposals and PSSs that are in its scope of interest ...
- Review Communicating Devices
- Marti updated the group on a few remaining issues with the "Device Resource Elements" table
- Specific elements of interest included
- "status" and what the PoCD and which of the values (active | inactive | entered-in-error | unknown) should be mapped
- identifier / serialNumber- and what to do when the UDI is present; is that sufficient; should serialNumber always be provided; what if both are provided and don't match?!
- There are other topics but given the small group and some key experts who were not able to make the discussion, review will be pushed to next week
- Open "Stale" Jira Issues
- Marti indicated that there are a number of "stale" Jira tickets from prior years that should be reviewed and dispositioned by the HL7 DEV WG
- For example,
Which is from 2019 (!!!)Jira server Jira serverId 9b965702-34a7-3433-bf10-7f66fd69238c key FHIR-23847 - Is the attached XML file still relevant? Should the change (which was approved) be applied?
- ACTION( Martin Rosner Brian Reinhold ) Review FHIR-23847 and determine how it should be dispositioned.
- PROPOSAL: Perform a general review of Jira items that are inactive and have a "device" connection
- May WGM Agenda Review
- Topics for the HL7 DEV May WGM Agenda were reviewed; proposed updates posted to the Topics section at the top of the page
- OO Agenda was also linked
- Final agenda review proposed for next meeting
- Any Other Business
- Todd mentioned that the co-chairs recently received a query from Lloyd (now part of Accenture, who bought Gevity) for a potential "activity monitoring" project; of course Martin Rosner was not included in that co-chair communication, arguably being the most familiar of the co-chairs with that topic!
- This may result in a discussion with the DEV WG soon + a new Project Proposal / PSS that could be sponsored by DEV or as a co-sponsor.
- ACTION( Todd Cooper ) Add Martin R. to the email thread with Lloyd.
- Todd mentioned that the co-chairs recently received a query from Lloyd (now part of Accenture, who bought Gevity) for a potential "activity monitoring" project; of course Martin Rosner was not included in that co-chair communication, arguably being the most familiar of the co-chairs with that topic!
...