Meeting Minutes from Discussion
|Casey Thompson email@example.com|
|Approval of this Agenda||yes as modified during meeting|
|Prior call Minutes approval||yes|
|co-chair nominations and elections|
Send nominations to: Linda@HL7.org by June 15. While you can just submit your name, often people submit a short bio as you can see here:
We need at least one more person other than Debi/Dave/Virginia to run. However, if anyone is interested please nominate yourself. Voting will occur in the summer.
HL7 point of policy:
PE WG projects
|Patient Contributed Data|
Discussed draft proposal. Maria moved to approve Jan's draft, Nancy seconded. Unanimous except 1 abstain. — by the of meeting Jan already submitted it to HL7:
|Future call: |
Lisa to present Care Planning WG's work
|Other WGs' project proposals that we might follow|
Others' project proposals: examples:i - Vital Signs Project, Recent Consent Project, and "Account, Payments, and Statements"
See heading 2a, "Primary/Sponsor WG"
Note, that this one's a project SCOPE statement, not the brief Project Proposal
Which should we be following? How do we spot them and what do we do about them? How do you-all do this in other groups?
HL7 Project Proposals page link: https://confluence.hl7.org/display/PSS
The project proposals space in confluence: https://confluence.hl7.org/display/TPTF
And in Jira:
Being a co-sponsor of a project is a much bigger obligation than being an "interested party." The latter only gets occasional notification of news.
This subject is tabled for now. All of HL7 needs our voice but there's a big question of who in our modest group is going to take on responsibility for doing whatever we'd be agreeing to do.
John Moehrke presented for 20 minutes on the work in CBCP. Link to the GoToMeeting recording. John's part is the last 25 minutes: https://transcripts.gotomeeting.com/#/s/5d318e7a980154197b9f7be4d030029a95c51e771042e064d09811deb3375457
Mikhael Mikael expressed interest in following consents.
We need to have John continue presenting more.