Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
  • Choose Affirmative, Negative, Abstain, Refer to Telcon for each item.

  • Use the  in the comments section to add comments to the vote.

  • Negatives that do NOT have a comment will be considered abstain.Please register your vote below.

  • Feel free to comment inline on Confluence documents*.


title of item up for approval w/linkVoteDecision
PACIO Project Functional Status PSS

PACIO Functional Status

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (8 Total Votes) Comments
abstain PACIO Functional Status
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative: can you add Payers to 6f stakeholder please
negative: Deliverable dates are in the past. Also, need to work with SD and C-CDA to align C-CDA
affirmative: Agree that dates must be updated prior to going to TSC, but should move it ahead.
refer to telecon: This PSS and the Cognitive Status PSS need discussion due to the confusion over what work group is sponsoring these two projects. Patient Care has asserted they only approved one of these two.
affirmative PACIO Functional Status
6 Votes , 75%
negative PACIO Functional Status
1 Votes , 12%
refer to telecon PACIO Functional Status
1 Votes , 12%
Status

PROPOSED

Moved-Second
Affirm-Negative-Abstain
Date

Jul 08, 2020 19:36

Owner
Patient Care
Project Insight ID1571

PACIO Project Cognitive Status PSS

PACIO Cognitive Status

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (8 Total Votes) Comments
abstain PACIO Cognitive Status
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative: can you add Payers to 6f stakeholders
negative: Deliverable dates are in the past. Also, need to work with SD and C-CDA to align C-CDA
affirmative: Agree that dates must be updated prior to going to TSC, but should move it ahead.
refer to telecon: This PSS and the Cognitive Status PSS need discussion due to the confusion over what work group is sponsoring these two projects. Patient Care has asserted they only approved one of these two.
affirmative PACIO Cognitive Status
6 Votes , 75%
negative PACIO Cognitive Status
1 Votes , 12%
refer to telecon PACIO Cognitive Status
1 Votes , 12%
Status

PROPOSED

Moved-Second
Affirm-Negative-Abstain
Date

Jul 08, 2020 19:36

Owner
Patient Care
Project Insight ID
1572
COVID 19 FHIR Profile Library IG

COVID 19 FHIR IG

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain COVID 19 FHIR IG
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative: Suggestion to have more descriptive name as COVID 19 is too broad. Perhaps "COVID-19 Concept Modeling on FHIR IG" or something in that direction.
refer to telecon: Agree that naming is a bit too broad. Alignment with existing COVID-19 projects (SANER, others?) is not addressed and should be noted. Deliverable timeline is not specified and the deliverable is "a new standard" which is at beast too generally stated. It is likely an IG.
refer to telecon: L Conn: There is an existing "Electronic Case Reporting FHIR IG" that should be used for submitting COVID case reports to public heath. When this project started the eCR team met with Stan and Susan and it was agreed that this effort was more of a "library of resources" but isn't an implementable IG and definitely not for Case Reporting. Suggest renaming and support Hans suggestion too.
refer to telecon: (Steve P) Given just some of the early comments seems best to cover this one through one round of telecon discussion.
affirmative COVID 19 FHIR IG
3 Votes , 42%
negative COVID 19 FHIR IG
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon COVID 19 FHIR IG
4 Votes , 57%
Status

PROPOSED

Moved-Second
Affirm-Negative-Abstain
Date

Jul 08, 2020 19:36

Owner
CIMI
Project Insight ID1620

*  Refer to Can I add comments without editing the page? for directions.