Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
  • Choose Affirmative, Negative, Abstain, Refer to Telcon for each item.

  • Use the  in the comments section to add comments to the vote.

  • Negatives that do NOT have a comment will be considered abstain.Please register your vote below.

  • Feel free to comment inline on Confluence documents*.


title of item up for approval w/link
New! Patient Empowerment Workgroup Formation Request Feedback

Please add your comments and feedback on the linked page.


Project Approval Request by the InM WG of the Infrastructure SD for Notifications at Project Insight 1516

Note from Anne: This was originally approved by the TSC in April, but has since had a name change, sponsor/steering division change, and added cosponsors.

Notifications PSS

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain Notifications PSS
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative Notifications PSS
7 Votes , 100%
negative Notifications PSS
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon Notifications PSS
0 Votes , 0%

Missed NIB Deadline Extension Request by the BR&R WG of the Clinical SD for Single Institutional Review Board Project (sIRB)

This project's PSS deadline extension request was approved yesterday, one day after the NIB deadline. From the WG:

Dear TSC,

The sIRB project team is requesting an extension for the NIB. We were not able to complete a NIB because the PSS was not submitted to the TSC by the timeline. This week the TSC has granted us an extension for the PSS which will be submitted to the TSC soon.  We hope you will also grant the NIB extension so we can ballot this January before our funding ends in April. 

Thank you for your consideration!

Anita Walden


sIRB NIB Extension

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain sIRB NIB Extension
1 Votes , 14%
affirmative sIRB NIB Extension
6 Votes , 85%
negative sIRB NIB Extension
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon sIRB NIB Extension
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1901002: WG Co-Chair Emeritus

GOM 1901002

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1901002
3 Votes , 42%
affirmative GOM 1901002
4 Votes , 57%
negative GOM 1901002
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 1901002
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1901004 Institute named proxy for Normative Ballot

GOM 1901004

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1901004
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative: Voting affirmative - however, when an organizational member's key voting representative changes, does the organization need to have new proxy statement drawn up for all of its other voting members? (And what if that happens after a ballot and both the commenter and the key representative have left the company)? (Floyd's comment)
refer to telecon: In recalling the FHIR R4 vote, we learned that the name voter had left and no other org rep would agree to remove the negative, even though it was obviously invalid. Unless we can be sure there is a current rep (either primary or proxy) this can happen again. I think that if we can't contact anyone from an org, the org's prior negative votes should be considered non-applicable anymore. Otherwise we could get trapped again.
refer to telecon: The idea of a deputy is good,but I agree with Wayne that it might be useful to have also a "break-the-glass" solution
affirmative GOM 1901004
5 Votes , 71%
negative GOM 1901004
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 1901004
2 Votes , 28%

GOM Revision: 1905002 Revised Naming Convention

I had a hard time getting this one into Confluence due to formatting.

If you see something that looks off, please reference the original document 

GOM 19015002

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 19015002
1 Votes , 14%
affirmative GOM 19015002
6 Votes , 85%
negative GOM 19015002
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 19015002
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1905006 Voting Pool for Co-Chair Election

GOM 19015006

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 19015006
1 Votes , 14%
affirmative GOM 19015006
6 Votes , 85%
negative GOM 19015006
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 19015006
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1909001 Clarify withdrawal of an HL7 ANS

GOM 1909001

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1909001
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon: Riki: Question: I always thought reaffirmation would be at the same level as the original document - is that not a requirement?
affirmative GOM 1909001
6 Votes , 85%
negative GOM 1909001
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 1909001
1 Votes , 14%
GOM Revision: 1909003 Eligibility Requirements for WG Co-Chair

GOM 1909003

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1909003
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative GOM 1909003
7 Votes , 100%
negative GOM 1909003
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 1909003
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1909004 Revise GOM and ER Maintenance Process

GOM 1909004

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1909004
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative GOM 1909004
7 Votes , 100%
negative GOM 1909004
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 1909004
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1909005 Cite 30-day NIB in GOM

GOM 1909005

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1909005
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative GOM 1909005
7 Votes , 100%
negative GOM 1909005
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 1909005
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1909006 Allow Associate Executive Director as alternate for EC

GOM 1909006

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1909006
0 Votes , 0%
negative: This states "who, with the addition of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer, and the Executive Director or in their stead the Associate Executive Director" - "who with" creates a group - CEO, CTO and ED. The use of the pronoun "their"(plural possessive pronoun, and means “belonging to them) indicates that the AED may sit in replacement of the group CEO and CTO and ED. This allows the Chair, vice-chair, Secretary, Treasurer and AED to constitute the EC.
affirmative GOM 1909006
6 Votes , 85%
negative GOM 1909006
1 Votes , 14%
refer to telecon GOM 1909006
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1909008 Clarify statement regards no campaigning

GOM 1909008

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1909008
0 Votes , 0%
negative: I believe that this one should be taken off as the GOC needs to fix the last statement about how to find out about the results of a vote to bring it in line with the rest of the voting verbiage (i.e. not restricted to just voting members of an affiliate).
affirmative: lines 13-15. This restricts requesting the results of an election to named voting representatives of Affiliates, but we allow affiliate members to stand as co-chairs and to vote on elections. It seems wrong that I can be a co-chair but not request election results
affirmative GOM 1909008
6 Votes , 85%
negative GOM 1909008
1 Votes , 14%
refer to telecon GOM 1909008
0 Votes , 0%
GOM Revision: 1909009 Process to decrease active WG co-chairs

GOM 1909009

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (7 Total Votes) Comments
abstain GOM 1909009
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative GOM 1909009
7 Votes , 100%
negative GOM 1909009
0 Votes , 0%
refer to telecon GOM 1909009
0 Votes , 0%

*  Refer to Can I add comments without editing the page? for directions.

  • No labels