1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact being Reaffirmed or proceeding to Normative directly after being either Informative or STU?
No
1e. Today's Date
1f. Name of standard being reaffirmed
1g. Project Artifact Information
1h. ISO/IEC Standard to Adopt
1i. Does the standard include excerpted text from one or more ISO, IEC or ISO/IEC standards, but is not an identical or modified adoption?
1j. Unit of Measure
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Service Oriented Architecture
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2c. Co-Sponsor Update Periods
at WGMs
2b. Co-Sponsor WG 2
Security
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2f. Modeling Facilitator
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2h. Vocabulary Facilitator
2i. Domain Expert Representative
2j. Business Requirements Analyst
2k. Conformance Facilitator
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
Attachments
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
3k. Additional Backwards Compatibility Information (if applicable)
3l. Using Current V3 Data Types?
N/A
3l. Reason for not using current V3 data types?
3m. External Vocabularies
Unknown
3n. List of Vocabularies
3o. Earliest prior release and/or version to which the compatibility applies
4a. Products
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
4b. For FHIR IGs and FHIR Profiles, what product version(s) will the profiles apply to?
4c. FHIR Profiles Version
4d. Please define your New Product Definition
4d. Please define your New Product Family
5a. Project Intent
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5a. White Paper Type
5a. Is the project adopting/endorsing an externally developed IG?
5a. Externally developed IG is to be (select one)
5a. Specify external organization
5a. Revising Current Standard Info
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5c. Additional Ballot Info
5d. Joint Copyright
No
5e. I understand I must submit a Joint Copyright Letter of Agreement to the TSC in order for the PSS to receive TSC approval.
no
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6b. Content Already Developed
6c. Content externally developed?
6d. List Developers of Externally Developed Content
6e. Is this a hosted (externally funded) project?
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6f. Other Stakeholders
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6g. Other Vendors
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6h. Other Providers
6i. Realm
Universal
7d. US Realm Approval Date
7a. Management Group(s) to Review PSS
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
May 11, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor Approval Date
Jun 02, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor 2 Approval Date
Jul 07, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor 3 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 4 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 5 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 6 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 7 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 8 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 9 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 10 Approval Date
7e. CDA MG Approval Date
7f. FMG Approval Date
7g. V2 MG Approval Date
7h. Architecture Review Board Approval Date
7i. Steering Division Approval Date
Jul 27, 2020
7j. TSC Approval Date
Version
15
Modifier
Paul Knapp
Modify Date
Jul 28, 2020 00:23
1a. Project Name
Consent Management Service
1b. Project ID
1624
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2c. Co-Sponsor Update Periods
at WGMs
2b. Co-Sponsor WG 2
Security
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
May 11, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor Approval Date
Jun 02, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor 2 Approval Date
Jul 07, 2020
7i. Steering Division Approval Date
Jul 27, 2020
Version
14
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
Jul 10, 2020 16:55
1a. Project Name
Consent Management Service
1b. Project ID
1624
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2c. Co-Sponsor Update Periods
at WGMs
2b. Co-Sponsor WG 2
Security
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
May 11, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor Approval Date
Jun 02, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor 2 Approval Date
Jul 07, 2020
Version
13
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
Jun 02, 2020 17:15
1a. Project Name
Consent Management Service
1b. Project ID
1624
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2c. Co-Sponsor Update Periods
at WGMs
2b. Co-Sponsor WG 2
Security
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
May 11, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor Approval Date
Jun 02, 2020
Version
12
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
Jun 02, 2020 17:14
1a. Project Name
Consent Management Service
1b. Project ID
1624
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2c. Co-Sponsor Update Periods
at WGMs
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
May 11, 2020
7c. Co-Sponsor Approval Date
Jun 02, 2020
Version
11
Modifier
Vincent McCauley
Modify Date
May 19, 2020 03:23
1a. Project Name
Consent Management Service
1b. Project ID
1624
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request periodic project updates; specify period in text box below (e.g. 'Monthly', 'At WGMs', etc.)
2c. Co-Sponsor Update Periods
at WGMs
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
May 11, 2020
Version
10
Modifier
Dave Hamill
Modify Date
May 12, 2020 15:37
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1b. Project ID
1624
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
May 11, 2020
Version
9
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 21:31
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
May 11, 2020
Version
8
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 21:27
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - May 2022
3j. Backwards Compatibility
No
3l. Using Current V3 Data Types?
N/A
3m. External Vocabularies
Unknown
4a. Products
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
5a. Project Intent
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
Version
7
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 21:26
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
Service Functional Model Published - May 2021
Normative Ballot - January 2022
3j. Backwards Compatibility
No
3l. Using Current V3 Data Types?
N/A
3m. External Vocabularies
Unknown
4a. Products
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
5a. Project Intent
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
Version
6
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 21:24
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
Stefano Lotti - this will provide input to the HL7 Service Interoperability Reference Architecture work
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Connectathon - Sept 2020
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
3j. Backwards Compatibility
No
3l. Using Current V3 Data Types?
N/A
3m. External Vocabularies
Unknown
4a. Products
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
5a. Project Intent
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
Version
5
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 21:22
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures.
Consent Management is commonly addressed in regulation in participating jurisdictions.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Connectathon - Sept 2020
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
3j. Backwards Compatibility
No
3l. Using Current V3 Data Types?
N/A
3m. External Vocabularies
Unknown
4a. Products
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
5a. Project Intent
Create new standard, Supplement to a current standard
5b. Project Ballot Type
STU to Normative
5d. Joint Copyright
No
6a. External Project Collaboration
Telstra Health / ONC Leap Pilot with SD HealthConnect
6f. Stakeholders
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
6g. Vendors
Pharmaceutical, EHR, PHR, Equipment, Health Care IT, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Lab, HIS
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Emergency Services, Local and State Departments of Health, Medical Imaging Service, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
Version
4
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 21:15
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3b. Project Need
Appropriate management of patient consent is a fundamental capability of care management. Defined Service included Service Functional Model and guidance for the use of existing standards will enable consistent integrations into existing software architectures
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Connectathon - Sept 2020
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
3j. Backwards Compatibility
No
3l. Using Current V3 Data Types?
N/A
4a. Products
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
5a. Project Intent
Create new standard
Version
3
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 21:12
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource. The implementation guidance produced with address different types of exchanges including v2, Direct (C-CDA), eHealthExchange (C-CDA and XDS) and FHIR, Australian Secure Messaging Delivery (SMD) and MyHR (XDS). A companion reference implementation project is occurring as an ONC Leap Pilot. An Australian implementation is also considering developing a Consent Management Service.
It is not the intent of this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Connectathon - Sept 2020
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
3j. Backwards Compatibility
No
4a. Products
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
Version
2
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 21:00
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3a. Project Scope
Service Functional Model API capturing the results of the Consent Management Pilot which is addressing the use of existing FHIR resources for Consent Management with Patient Consent, as represented by the FHIR Consent Resource
It is not the intent of the this project to alter the FHIR Consent or related resources, only to address the APIs used with them. Any required changes to the base resources will be addressed via FHIR change requests to the responsible work group.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Connectathon - Sept 2020
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
3j. Backwards Compatibility
No
4a. Products
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
Version
1
Modifier
Lorraine Constable
Modify Date
May 11, 2020 20:53
1a. Project Name
Consent Mangement Service
1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
No
1d. Is your Project Artifact now proceeding to Normative directly or after being either Informative or STU?
No
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Structured Documents
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Community Based Care and Privacy
2d. Project Facilitator
Jerry Goodnough, Mohammad Jafari
2g. Publishing Facilitator
Lorraine Constable
2l. Other Facilitators
SOA - Vince McCauley
2m. Implementers
Telstra Health
SD Health Connect
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
ONC Leap Pilot
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
Connectathon - Sept 2020
Initial STU Ballot - January 2021
I highly appreciate this initiative believing this is a valuable activity. Nevertheless, I do have to minor remarks:
I do not know how much the IHE profiles BPPC and APPC are considered or addressed?
Consent management is currently under development in Germany by important national initiatives. There should be a bidirectional communication in order to benefit on both sides.
1 Comment
Frank Oemig
I highly appreciate this initiative believing this is a valuable activity. Nevertheless, I do have to minor remarks: