Do not launch ANY of the links while your are in create or edit mode. There is a good chance all of your work will be gone.
Template Usage Information:
- Submit template change requests to PMO@HL7.org
- For Reaffirmations, please refer to the FAQ in Hl7 Project Scope Statement Instructions for a list of which sections and fields should be completed
Project Name and ID
Enter the name of the project here: C-CDA Rubric Update (Formalize a Rubric to Assess the Quality of C-CDA Documents)
Complete this section for all “Direct to Normative” ballot projects and when a project proceeds from “Informative to Normative” or “STU to Normative”.
Forward PSS to the TSC (via tscpm@HL7.org); this triggers American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Project Initiation Notification (PINS) submission.
TSC Notification: Informative/STU to Normative
- or - Direct to Normative (no STU) (includes reaffirmations)
Identify ISO, IEC or ISO/IEC standard to be adopted in text box below
Enter info here if an ISO, IEC, or ISO/IEC Standard is to be adopted as an American National Standard; Enter the designation of the standard(s) to be adopted:
Includes text from ISO, IEC or ISO/IEC standard: Check here if this standard includes excerpted text from one or more ISO, IEC or ISO/IEC standards, but is not an identical or modified adoption.
Select the unit of measure used in the standard; if no measurements are in the standard, select N/A
Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)
Date : 1-17-2019
Check this box when the project is investigative or exploratory in nature, which allows limited project scope definition. Sections 1-Project Name, 2-Sponsoring Group(s)/Project Team, 3a-Project Scope, 3b-Project Need, 3e-Project Objectives/Deliverables/Target Dates, 3i-Project Document Repository, 6b-[Realm, if known], and 6d-[applicable Approval Dates] are required for Investigative Project. Investigative Project specific instructions are highlighted in yellow. An investigative project must advance in two WGM cycles, requiring a full scope statement. Otherwise the project will be closed.
2. Sponsoring Group(s) / Project Team
2.a. Primary Sponsor/Work Group
Primary Sponsor/Work Group
Structured Documents Workgroup
2.b. Co-sponsor Work Group(s)
Co-sponsor Work Group(s): Patient Care(Enter co-sponsor approval dates in Section 6.d Project Approval Dates)
|Indicate the level of involvement that the co-sponsor will have for this project:|
|Request formal content review prior to ballot|
|Request periodic project updates. Specify period|
|Other Involvement. Specify details here:|
2.c. Project Team
All names should have confirmed their role in the project prior to submission to the TSC.
Project facilitator (1Mandatory)
Other interested parties and their roles
Michael Clifton, Epic; Benjamin Flessner, Redox; Andrew Statler, Cerner
Multi-disciplinary project team (recommended)
Domain expert rep
Brett Marquard; Gay Dolin
Business requirement analyst
Conformance facilitator (for IG projects)
Other facilitators (SOA, etc)
Implementers (2Mandatory for STU projects)
FHIR Project Note: The implementer requirement will be handled by the “balloting” project. Therefore work groups do not fill out the above section. However, feel free to list implementers specific to your work group’s resources if you know of any.
3. Project Definition
3.a. Project Scope
This project will develop an informative ballot of the C-CDA rules approved by the Structured Documents Workgroup in 2016 and 2018. There is an ongoing process to update the C-CDA Scoring Rubric, originally completed in 2016 by Structured Documents Workgroup. The deliverable will be a set of rules defining the methodology behind the scoring rubric to be used by tool developers to include in their C-CDA testing tool. The project will utilize feedback form the C-CDA Implementation-a-thons and will go through a peer review process before each update is finalized. The deliverables are specific to US Realm, but could be extended. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) currently utilizes the scoring rules in their C-CDA Scorecard.
Background: The C-CDA Scorecard enables providers, implementers, and health IT professionals with a tool that compares how artifacts (transition of care documents, care plans etc) created by an organization stack up against the HL7 C-CDA implementation guide and HL7 best practices. The C-CDA Scorecard promotes best practices in C-CDA implementation by assessing key aspects of the structured data found in individual documents. The Scorecard tool provides a rough quantitative assessment and highlights areas of improvement which can be made today to move the needle forward in interoperability of C-CDA documents. The intent is for providers and health IT developers to utilize the tool to identify and resolve issues around C-CDA document interoperability in their health IT systems.
3.b. Project Need
There is an industry need for disparate systems to be able to communicate with each other. This work will help identify inconsistent implementation of C-CDA Templates and will help start a conversation between vendors and their customers.
3.c. Security Risks
Will this project produce executable(s), for example, schemas, transforms, style sheets, executable program, etc. If so the project must review and document security risks. Refer to the Cookbook for Security Considerations for additional guidance, including sample spreadsheets that may be used to conduct the security risk assessment.
3.d. External Drivers
Describe any external schedules or calendars which may not be known outside of the project team that are driving target dates for this project..
3.e. Project Objectives / Deliverables / Target Dates
Within each row, enter the explicit work product(s) / objective(s). Indicate their target date at the right in WGM/Ballot Cycle format. Include the project end date as the last objective (for standards projects, the end date will be the projected ANSI approval date).
Target Date(in WGM or ballot cycle format, e.g.
‘2017 Sept WGM’ or
‘2017 Jan Ballot’)
Draft outline of Rubric
|Finalize proposed rules||2019 March|
Submit for Informative Ballot(First Ballot Cycle)
2019 May Ballot
Complete Informative Reconciliation
2019 May WGM
3.f. Common Names / Keywords / Aliases
C-CDA; Scorecard; Rubrics; Rules
If your project creates a Post-Release 1 version; indicate the name of the prior product and if it is supplanting, replacing or coexisting with a previous release:
3.h. Project Dependencies
3.i. HL7-Managed Project Document Repository Location
A template to create a Project Page on the HL7 Wiki is available at: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Template:Project_Page.
|Enter the SPECIFIC URL of the HL7-MANAGED SITE where supporting project documents, deliverables, ballot reconciliation work and other project information will be kept.|
3.j. Backwards Compatibility
Are the items being produced by this project backward compatible?
If you check 'Yes' please indicate the earliest prior release and/or version to which the compatibility applies:
For V3, are you using the current data types?
(Refer to TSC position statement on new projects using R2B for more information on the current V3 data types)
If you check no, please explain the reason:
If desired, enter additional information regarding Backwards Compatibility.
3.k. External Vocabularies
Will this project include/reference external vocabularies?
If Yes, please enter the vocabularies:
4. Products (check all that apply)
V2 Messages – Administrative
Clinical Information Modeling Initiative (CIMI)
V2 Messages - Clinical
Clinical Context Object Workgroup (CCOW)
V2 Messages - Departmental
Domain Analysis Model (DAM)
V2 Messages – Infrastructure
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Functional Profile
V3 Domain Information Model (DIM / DMIM)
V3 Documents – Administrative (e.g. SPL)
FHIR Implementation Guide (enter FHIR product version below)
V3 Documents – Clinical (e.g. CDA)
FHIR Profiles (enter FHIR product version below)
V3 Documents - Knowledge
V3 Foundation – RIM
Guidance (e.g. Companion Guide, Cookbook, etc)
V3 Foundation – Vocab Domains & Value Sets
V3 Messages - Administrative
V3 Messages - Clinical
New Product Definition (please define below)
V3 Messages - Departmental
New Product Family (please define below)
V3 Messages - Infrastructure
Non Product Project - (Educ. Marketing, Elec. Services, etc.)
V3 Rules - GELLO
V3 Services – Java Services (ITS Work Group)
Creating/Using a tool not listed in the HL7 Tool Inventory
V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)
If you checked New Product Definition or New Product Family, please define below:
For FHIR IGs and FHIR Profiles, what product version(s) will the profiles apply to?
5. Project Intent (check all that apply)
Create new standard
Supplement to a current standard
Revise current standard (see text box below)
Implementation Guide (IG) will be created/modified
Reaffirmation of a standard
Project is adopting/endorsing an externally developed IG:
New/Modified HL7 Policy/Procedure/Process
Specify external organization in Sec. 6 below;
Externally developed IG is to be (select one):
White Paper (select one):
Adopted - OR -
Balloted Informative OR
Non-balloted WG White Paper
N/A (Project not directly related to an HL7 Standard)
If revising a current standard, indicate the following:
|- Name of the standard being revised:|
|- Date it was published (or request for publication, or ANSI designation date)|
|- Rationale for revision|
|- The relationship between the new standard and the current standard (is it designed to replace the current standard, a supplement to the current standard, etc.)|
5.a. Ballot Type (check all that apply)
Comment (aka Comment-Only)
Joint Ballot (with other SDOs)
N/A (project won’t go through ballot)
STU to Normative - OR -
Normative (no STU)
If necessary, add any additional ballot information here. If artifacts will be jointly balloted with other SDOs, list the other groups.
5.b. Joint Copyright
Check this box if you will be pursuing a joint copyright. Note that when this box is checked, a Joint Copyright Letter of Agreement must be submitted to the TSC in order for the PSS to receive TSC approval.
Joint Copyrighted Material will be produced?
6. Project Logistics
6.a. External Project Collaboration
For projects that have some of their content already developed: C-CDA Rubric Update Team
How much content for this project is already developed?
Was the content externally developed ? :
Is this a hosted (externally funded) project? (not asking for amount just if funded)
- OR -
Check here if this standard balloted or was previously approved as realm specific standard
6.c. Stakeholders / Vendors / Providers
This section must be completed for projects containing items expected to be ANSI approved, as it is an ANSI requirement for all ballots
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories
Quality Reporting Agencies
Local and State Departments of Health
Health Care IT
Medical Imaging Service
Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
Other (specify in text box below)
Other (specify in text box below)
Other (specify below)
Other: Indicate other stakeholders, vendors or providers not listed above.
6.d. Project Approval Dates
Click here to go to HL7 Project Scope Statement Instructions#Appendix A for more information regarding this section.
Approvals are by simple majority vote of the approving body
Sponsoring Work Group Approval Date:
WG Approval Date
Administrative review – in parallel with Work Group Approval
Co-Sponsor Group Approval Date
Family Management Group Approval Date(s)
CIMI Projects: CIMI Management Group
CIMI MG Approval Date
CDA Projects: CDA Management Group
CDA MG Approval Date
FHIR Projects: FHIR Management Group
FMG Approval Date
V2/Publishing Projects: V2 Management Group
V2 MG Approval Date
US Realm Projects: US Realm Steering Committee Approval
USRSC Approval Date
Affiliate Specific Projects: Affiliate Approval Date
Affiliate Approval Date
Submit PSS to Steering Division after all of the above approvals are received
Steering Division (of Primary Sponsor WG) Approval Date:
ARB and Steering Division approval may be in parallel
Architectural Review Board Approval Date:
(required for externally developed content)
ARB Approval Date
If applicable, TSC has received a Joint Copyright/Distribution Agreement (containing the verbiage outlined within the SOU),
Technical Steering Committee Approval Date:
TSC Approval Date