- Created by Sean McIlvenna, last modified by Andrew Statler on Oct 08, 2020
To record your attendance at the SDWG Conference Call, click the sign-on button to the right:
Call Details:
Zoom Information
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/465862913?pwd=cUllR1BndVpYNVpyR3dzc3VIUERTZz09
Meeting ID: 465 862 913
Passcode: 310940
Phone Information:
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 929 436 2866 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Germantown)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kb1hK2eKvz
Attendees:
Agenda:
10:00am ET
- Call to order
- Business Updates (10 min)
- Additions/modifications to the agenda
2020 September SDWG WGM Agenda
- approved by General Consent
- Approve minutes from 2020-09-17 Agenda and Minutes
- approved by General Consent
- HL7
- RIM (Austin Kreisler)
- No updates
- Discussion about codeset updates needed on a future call
- Steering Division / TSC (Austin Kreisler)
- New PSS's for inclusion in May 2021 ballot due to PMO on Friday (10/9)
- NIBs due Nov. 1st
- CDA-MG (Lisa R. Nelson, Linda Michaelsen )
- Wayne Kubick joined yesterday and there was discussion about the direction this group was going yesterday. There was discussion about what the CDA MG thinks the CDA standard means. How and operationally what that means. Be careful about over generalizations. Proceed with caution as a layered organization with guidance from the top and bottom up as well. Clarify the roadmap from CDA and the roadmap from Consolidated-CDA. Making progress on that. Bringing some of the work for roadmapping for specific product lines. Could be C-CDA. Could be QRDA. Could be relevant. Could be bringing the plan back to SD for management.
- Wednesday Oct 21 is the IAT. 10am-6pm ET over zoom.
- Vocab (Rob McClure)
- Nothing specific for SD.
- Publishing, Electronic Services and Tools (PEST) (Andrew Statler)
- Patient Care (Emma Jones)
- Nothing for Patient Care
- Example Task Force (https://cdasearch.hl7.org) (Brett Marquard)
- Meeting today
- RIM (Austin Kreisler)
- Review Project Proposals
- Project Proposals Home
- FAST Exchange Metadata Using RESTful Headers
- Only objective is to get a sponsor. It is not about getting co-sponsors. That is part of the PSS Process.
- FAST Exchange Metadata Using RESTful Headers
- Project Proposals Home
- External Updates - ONC and others
- None
- Project Updates
- None
- Additional Items
- C-CDA Companion Guide Comment 2036 Brett Marquard
- C-CDA Templates for Clinical Notes DSTU Release 2.1 Brett Marquard
- ODH STU Update v1.1 Review(Lori Fourquet)
- Digital Signatures STU Extension Request Digital Signatures and Delegation of Rights STU Extension Request (Natasha Kreisle)
- Extensions
- From the FM Agenda with SD at the WGM the minutes show that this will go back to SD to vote on. (Sept 22 at Noon 2020 SEP - FM Virtual WGM Agenda) (Natasha Kreisle)
- Finalizing CDA IG Quality Criteria (@Russ)
- Current Status of CDA Standards review
- SDWG PBS Metrics next steps
- STU Comments
- Two Advance Directives Templates, Release 1 - US Realm STU comments: http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail.cfm?dstuid=223 (Lisa R. Nelson)
- Two PACP STU Comments http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail.cfm?dstuid=296 (Natasha Kreisle)
- HL7 CDA® R2 IG: C-CDA Templates for Clinical Notes DSTU Release 2.1 - US Realm
- Click here to expand...
STU
Last Updated
Commenter
Issue
2032 The following schematron asserts are untested, but seem easily testable:
1. a-81-7278-c
...
12. a-1198-7624-c2031 In the Physician Reading Study Performer (V2) template (urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.6.2.1:2014-06-09):
....
d. The id SHOULD include zero or one [0..1] id where id/@root="2.16.840.1.113883.4.6" National Provider Identifier (CONF:1098-32135).
It seems like we could clean up d. and standardize the templating a bit.2030 In the Diagnostic Imaging Report template:
If the DICOM Object Catalog section SHALL come first, then why not list it before the Findings section?
2029 In the Mental Stagus Organizer (V3) template (urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.75:2015-08-01):
a. The Organizer SHALL have at least one of code or effectiveTime (CONF:1198-32426).
Why does this exist? We already know the organizer SHALL have a code because of CONF:1198-14378, so I can't see a circumstance in which this statement ever does anything.2028 Typo (should be entryRelationship):
12. SHALL contain at least one [1..*] entryRelationships (CONF:1098-32782).
Note that this isn't tested in the schematron either, presumably because it was looking for an "entryRelationships" element. We should fix this in Trifolia and I think (hope?) that'll give us the schematron fix for free.2027 The schematron has the following assert for CONF:1098-7508:
<sch:assert id="a-1098-7508-c" test="cda:effectiveTime[@xsi:type='IVL_TS']">SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] effectiveTime (CONF:1098-7508) such that it</sch:assert>
IVL_TS certainly does seem like the most likely @xsi:type to have for the first effectiveTime here (in contrast with the second, which the IG says SHALL have type PIVL_TS or EIVL_TS), but the IG itself never mentions the first effectiveTime's type, so this seems strange.2023 Currently the CDA R2.0 specification and the C-CDA IG don't provide a way to semantically convey that the patient or an individual (a relatedPerson) is the Custodian of the information. 2021 Priyaranjan Tokachichu The schematron rule considers "assignedPerson or representedOrganizaton" logic, but not "assignedPerson or (assignedAuthoringDevice and representedOrganization)". This results in schematron failure of "author/assignedAuthor" in the header that has "assignedPerson" and "representedOrganization" (which is valid based on implied meaning of (CONF:1198-8457)). 2016 The Planned Intervention Act (V2) contains text in the template description that is logically correct due to the intent of the section to contain only planned events: “All interventions referenced in a Planned Intervention Act must have moodCodes indicating that that are planned (have not yet occurred).”
So, any moodCode OTHER THAN "EVN".2007 The current Payer Section "REQUIRES" (SHALL 1..*) a prior authorization. There will not always be an authorization every time coverage is used/communicated in the Payer Section. 1945 Encounter Diagnosis (V3)
[act: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.80:2015-08-01 (open)]
This template wraps relevant problems or diagnoses at the close of a visit or that need to be followed after the visit. If the encounter is associated with a Hospital Discharge, the Hospital Discharge Diagnosis must be used. This entry requires at least one Problem Observation entry.1885 @sueann svaby SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] code, which SHOULD be selected from ValueSet Social History Type urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.80.60 DYNAMIC (CONF:1198-8558).
a. If @codeSystem is not LOINC, then this code SHALL contain at least one [1..*] translation, which SHOULD be selected from CodeSystem LOINC (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.6.1) (CONF:1198-32951).1873 Encounter Diagnosis (V3)
[act: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.80:2015-08-01 (open)]
The template is missing a binding for statusCode.
Figure 144 shows a statusCode of "active". This provides the wrong guidance.1859 Please REMOVE/DEPRECATE this commentIn the errata release from June 2019,Figure 162 is wrong and needs to be updated to use the correct Code System OID for CVX 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.6. It currently shows as 2.16.840.1.113762.12.292 Care Plan (V2)
[ClinicalDocument: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.1.15:2015-08-01 (open)]
The CDA Care Plan represents an instance of this dynamic Care Plan at a point in time. The CDA document itself is NOT dynamic.
Key differentiators between a Care Plan CDA and CCD (another “snapshot in time” document): There are 2 required sections:
o Health Concerns o Interventions
There are 2 optional sections:
o Goals o Outcomes
• Provides the ability to identify patient and provider priorities with each act • Provides a header participant to indicate occurrences of Care Plan review A care plan document can include entry references from the information in these sections to the information (entries) in other sections.
Please see Volume 1 of this guide to view a Care Plan Relationship diagram and story board.1802 Smoking Status - Meaningful Use (V2) (urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.78:2014-06-09)
. This value SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @code, which SHALL be selected from ValueSet Smoking Status urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.38 DYNAMIC (CONF:1098-14817).We have trouble adding new Social History Observations when the US Gov't identifies the observation using LOINC. We really should be using LOINC in the code ("the question").
I recommend creating a Grouping Value Set that combines the original set of concepts using SNOMEDCT (Social History Type (SNOMEDCT)) and then agree to put all new/additional social history observation codes in the Social History Type (LOINC) value set. Use the existing OID for the new Grouping VS and make two new value sets for the parts of the grouping VS.1798 On page 392, Section 3.61.1, the last three sentences of the text read as follows:
"Procedure act is for procedures that alter the physical condition of a patient (e.g., splenectomy). Observation act is for procedures that result in new information about a patient but do not cause physical alteration (e.g., EEG). Act is for all other types of procedures (e.g., dressing change)."
This is different from the wording on page 390, Section 3.61 Procedures Section (entries optional) (V2). Updated language is in the proposed section below.1793 3.41 Immunization Medication Information (V2) includes SHALL have a manufactureMaterial where this code MAY contain zero or more [0..*] translation, which MAY be selected from ValueSet Vaccine Clinical Drug urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.8 DYNAMIC (CONF:1098-31543). *1791
3.41 Immunization Medication Information (V2) includes SHALL have a manufactureMaterial where this code MAY contain zero or more [0..*] translation, which MAY be selected from ValueSet Vaccine Clinical Drug urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.8 DYNAMIC (CONF:1098-31543). 1790 SHOULD contain exactly one [1..1] effectiveTime (CONF:1098-32943) such that it
a. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @operator="A" (CONF:1098-32945).
b. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @xsi:type="PIVL_TS" or "EIVL_TS" (CONF:1098-32946).*1789
We have seen real-world implementation defects where planned future encounters appear in the Encounters section rather than the Plan of Treatment section where they should be. I think some developers are just querying their database encounter tables for all encounters for a particular patient and sticking everything in the Encounters section regardless of whether they are past or future. Let's introduce a new conformance rule to ensure each Encounter activity ends before the document header effectiveTime. *1782
In section 3.81 Procedure Activity Procedure (V2) the Procedure.code (CONF:1098-7656) doesn't mention HCPCS as a possible code system. I think that code system should be explicitly listed because it is in common use in the US realm along with CPT-4. There are many procedures which are in HCPCS but not in CPT-4.
This @code SHOULD be selected from LOINC (CodeSystem: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1) or SNOMED CT (CodeSystem: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.96), and MAY be selected from CPT-4 (CodeSystem: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.12) or ICD10 PCS (CodeSystem: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.4) or CDT-2 (Code System: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.13) (CONF:1098-19207).1777 The value set for statusCode for Medication Supply Order (v2) include several codes that are incompatible with the equivalent statusCodes in the FHIR US Core profile for MedicationRequest (http://hl7.org/fhir/STU3/valueset-medication-request-status.html). 1776 The statusCode for Immunizations in the Immunization Activity (v3) allows for all values in the ActStatus urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.15933: 1775 The value set for status of Result Observation (V3) [Result Status urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.39 STATIC] is broadly incompatible with the FHIR US Core value sets for Observation status (http://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-observation-status.html) and DiagnosticReport status (http://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-diagnostic-report-status.html). Here are the values for reference: 1774 The ProcedureAct statusCode urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.22 STATIC 2014-04-23 used for statusCode in the Procedure Activity Procedure (V2) template currently has 4 values: 1773 In the Goal Observation template, the status is currently hardcoded to "active": 1772 The C-CDA 2.1 Problem Value Set (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.3221.7.4) allows only terms descending from the Clinical Findings (404684003) or Situation with Explicit Context (243796009) hierarchies. 1768 Currently the Personal and Legal Relationship Role Type Value set (2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.12.1) is missing some (about 10) concepts needed to align with the corresponding Value set used in FHIR RelatedPerson.Relationship. 1765 Template Improvement Request: 1764 New feature request 1762 SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] componentOf (CONF:1198-8386).
a. This componentOf SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] encompassingEncounter (CONF:1198-8387).1760 Smoking Status - Meaningful Use (V2)
[observation: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.78:2014-06-09 (open)]1758 Immunizations Section (entries required) (V3)
[section: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.2.1:2015-08-01 (open)]1757 In order to stay aligned with FHIR, the Birth Sex entry template needs to be modified to use the same value set for birth sex.
The value set is being established now in VSAC. We believe the OID will be OID: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1021.24.1752 Page 85-86: "There are 2 required sections: Health Concerns and Interventions
There are 2 optional sections: Goals and Outcomes"1693 Interventions Section (V3)
[section: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.21.2.3:2015-08-01 (open)]1691 Currently the infulfillmentOF/order in the header doesn't seem to allow for the semantics to indicate when the document contains information about the initiation of an order. It only seems to permit indicating when a document contains information about the fulfillment of an order. Where would I index in the header information about evidence within the document indicating an order was placed? 1642 This template represents the patient's home environment including, but not limited to, type of residence (trailer, single family home, assisted living), living arrangement (e.g., alone, with parents), and housing status (e.g., evicted, homeless, home owner). 1638 This sdtc:dischargeDispositionCode SHOULD contain exactly [0..1] codeSystem, which SHOULD be either CodeSystem: NUBC 2.16.840.1.113883.6.301.5 OR CodeSystem: HL7 Discharge Disposition 2.16.840.1.113883.12.112 (CONF:1198-32377). 1626 Because LOINC has deprecated the code 52521-1 the examples for Care Plan document should use the replacement code of 18776-5, and the sample code in the value set should be fixed to use 18776-5.
Duplicate to 1625 - made this by mistake and couldn't figure out how to delete it.1625 Because LOINC has deprecated the code 52521-2 the examples for Care Plan document should use the replacement code of 18776-5, and the sample code in the value set should be fixed to use 18776-5. 1623 Health Status Evaluations and Outcomes Section
[section: identifier urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.61 (open)]
This template represents observations regarding the outcome of care from the interventions used to treat the patient. These observations represent status, at points in time, related to established care plan goals and/or interventions.1611 There is a general need to do an overall clean-up the C-CDA IG to go through all value set definitions and make sure that the source information is correct.
As we have improved the availability of value set definitions and expansions in VSAC, the source may have changed from PHINVADS or some other organization.1607 @Eric Parapini In the template Immunization Activity Act (V3) (TemplateId: 2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.52:2015-08-01) there is an entryRelationship to the Instruction (V2) template (TemplateId: 2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.20:2014-06-09). 1606 @Eric Parapini I would like to request the LOINC code "80791-7" Nutrition and dietetics Plan of care note be added to the Care Plan Document Type value set (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1099.10) 1605 In the latest errata version (CDAR2_IG_CCDA_CLINNOTES_R1_DSTU2.1_2015AUG_Vol2_2018MAYwith_errata.pdf) on page128 (2.1.8 above number 4) that "Preferred code is 18748-4 LOINC Diagnostic Imaging Report" but per LOINC, that code will be deprecated in December 2018 1603 From the C-CDA Companion Guide Note Activity Template (Page 92 - 9(c)(ii)(1)):
The playingEntity, if present, SHALL contain zero or more [0..*] US Realm Person Name (PN.US.FIELDED) (identifier: urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.5.1.1) (CONF:3250-16929).1602 Allergy & intolerance template (2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.7), substance reactant binding (CONF:1098-7419)
The bound value set is very large, making it difficult to support for both entry and validation.1525 SHOULD contain zero or one [0..1] performer="PRF" Performer (CodeSystem: HL7ParticipationType urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.5.90 STATIC) (CONF:1198-8961) such that it 1516 Number of Pressure Ulcers Observation (V3)
[observation: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.76:2015-08-01 (open)]
This template represents the number of pressure ulcers observed at a particular stage.1515 @George Dixon Clinical Documentation Request we are unable to support. Medication Administration- Ability to display an administered dose with a cumulative dose. Use Case - For a given treatment timeframe when ordering and administering chemotherapy medications related to their toxicity it is important to know the patient's running dosage received. Depending on the clinical environments management of visits (acute versus repeat outpatient treatments) this may be within an encounter or across encounters for a given period of time. Need communicate most recent dose(s), Cumulative interval (low/high) and cumulative dose. 1513 Table 400: Health Insurance Type
Code System OID is wrong
ALSO WRONG IN THE LIST OF CODES SYSTEMS USED IN THE IG1510 Value Set: HealthcareServiceLocation urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.20275
A comprehensive classification of locations and settings where healthcare services are provided. This value set is based on the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) location code system that has been developed over a number of years through CDC's interaction with a variety of healthcare facilities and is intended to serve a variety of reporting needs where coding of healthcare service locations is required.1505 Currently in the Patient Generated Document Header
13. MAY contain zero or more [0..*] documentationOf (CONF:1198-28710).
The code should be selected from a value set established by the document-level template for a specific type of Patient Generated Document.1502 @Berge,Ruth The link in section 1.1.17 Progress Note (v3) in Table 49 (Progress Note (V3) Context) for " Allergies and Intolerances Section (entries optional) (V3) " goes to 2.4.1 Allergies and Intolerances Section (entries required) (V3). This is also true for the link in Table 53: Referral Note (V2) Constraints Overview . In Table 53 the Allergies section is assigned CONF# 1198- 30625. On page 195, in the details for Allergies there is another link that also goes to the wrong Allergies and Intolerance Section. 1470 This comment refers back to decisions made in Errata 1338.
Given a proposed alternative constraint was not provided/proposed by Regenstrief in time to be included in the September errata update for C-CDA R2.1, I supported leaving the errata change as had been proposed and implemented in the US Realm header template draft C-CDA R2.1 errata release (shown below):1452 Value Set X_ActRelationshipDocument is a new value set that came into existence during the C-CDA R2.1 Errata Update. It needs to be added to the CCDA Value Set Summary sheet maintained in the HL7 SDWG Workgroup Documents area. 1430 SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] templateId (CONF:81-8531) such that it
a. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.6.1.2"1429 3.34 Goal Observation
...
MAY contain zero or one [0..1] value (CONF:1098-32743).*1428
Section 3.23, page 483:
Table 272: EncounterTypeCode
Value Set: EncounterTypeCode urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.80.32
This value set includes only the codes of the Current Procedure and Terminology designated for Evaluation and Management (99200 – 99607) (subscription to AMA Required
Value Set Source: http://www.amacodingonline.com/1425 @Hyde,Linda Value Set Links in IG
A number of the links for value sets in the IG either no long work or point to the wrong location. For example several value set links send you to the VTSL Browser (veterinary service extension); the link for the country value set is no longer valid.1424 @Hyde,Linda Wound Measurements Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.20.2.5 (dynamic)
IG table says 'A value set of SNOMED-CT codes to capture the dimensions of a wound' but the value set is using LOINC codes.1422 @Hyde,Linda Procedure Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.80.28 (dynamic)
This value set is referenced in the IG but does not appear in the list of value sets in the appendix or as it's own table. It appears in the section for 'performer for the value of service event code' pg 169,182. Value set covers all values under the 71388002 Procedure. It is in VSAC and in the R2.1 Value Set Download from VSAC.1421 @Hyde,Linda Pressure Point Value Set 2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.36 (static)
VSAC and Trifolia only have one code in common. Trifolia codes are for the site 'structure' and VSAC for 'skin structure of'. The IG value set table contains the same codes as Trifolia. The purpose of this value set is to identify the areas of the body generally associated with pressure ulcers so it would seem that 'skin structure of' would be the more appropriate concepts to use.1420 @Hyde,Linda Planned moodcode (Observation)Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.25 (static)
VSAC contains code for GOL (goal). This code is not in the IG table. It is in the ActMood table.1419 @Hyde,Linda ParticipationFunction Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.10267 (static)
There are new codes in the ParticipationFunction code system that are not in VSAC.1418 @Hyde,Linda Observation Interpretation (HL7)Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.78 (static)
1. There is a new version of ObservationInterpretation with additional codes that are not in VSAC and several codes in VSAC that are now deprecated.
2. Code system name in IG is HITSP-CS-83 but in VSAC it is ObservationInterpretation. IG should be updated1417 @Hyde,Linda INDRoleClassCodes Value set. 2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.33
The implementation contains references to both static and dynamic for this value set. Pages 62,97,144,157 refer to this value set as STATIC, however on page 204 it is listed as DYNAMIC.1416 @Hyde,Linda EntityPersonNamePartQualifier Value Set 2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.26(static)
LS legal status)code is not in VSAC. In the original version of the code system it was include but in a separate level. All the codes under _ PersonNamePartQualifier are in VSAC.1415 @Hyde,Linda Entity Name Use Value Set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.15913 (static)
All values of the EntityNameUse code system are in VSAC except OR (official registry).This code was not in the original code system but is in V3.1414 @Hyde,Linda Allergy and Intolerance Type Value Set 2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.3221.6.2 (dynamic) *1406
<!-- ************************ ENCOUNTERS *********************** -->
<component>
<section>
<!-- *** Encounters section (entries required) (V3) *** -->
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.22.1" extension="2015-08-01"/>
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.22.1"/>I think there is a problem with the sample CCD file C-CDA_R2-1_CCD.xml included in this package.
1381 doseQuanity/@unit and administrationUnitCode/@code are a confusing set of elements, but I will do my best pulling from the base definitions: 1370 In the Comment Activity template (2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.64):
5. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] text (CONF:81-9430).
a. This text SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] reference (CONF:81-15967).
- (expand HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: C-CDA Templates for Clinical Notes Companion Guide, Release 2 STU - US Realm )
- Click here to expand...
STU
Last Update
Commenter
Comment
2014 The Note Types Value Set (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.68) version 20191017 is missing three note types specific in USCDI v1: 1996 In Appendix C, I read the Provenance - Author Participation template as saying you can use the same trick as in the standard C-CDA Author Participation template to reference an author already defined elsewhere in the document:
The assignedAuthor/id may be set equal to (a pointer to) an id on a participant elsewhere in the document (header or entries) or a new author participant can be described here.(Vocab issue)
Table 9 of the Companion Guide recommends the LOINC codes 11502-2 for Laboratory Narrative notes and 11526-1 for Pathology Narrative notes. However, these codes aren't actually included in the Note Types value set (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.68) as required by the Notes Section and Note Activity templates in Appendix A. Likewise, although no specific LOINC code is recommended for Imaging Narrative notes, the value set doesn't include any codes from the value set recommended for imaging notes in Table 8 (urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.12009.10.2.5).For the UDI information, can we get clarification on whether it is possible to send other information when we do not have the DI information? Appendix B UDI
1.1 UDI OrganizerFigure 1: Unique Device Identifier (UDI) Organizer Template ID root is incorrect
11:00am ET
- Value Set Updates- Rob McClure
- Adjournment
Notes/Minutes:
10:00am ET
- Call to order
- Meeting started at 10:05am
- Business Updates (10 min)
- Additions/modifications to the agenda
- Approve minutes from 2020-09-17 Agenda and Minutes
- HL7
- RIM (Austin Kreisler)
- Steering Division / TSC (Austin Kreisler)
- New PSS's for inclusion in May 2021 ballot due to PMO on Friday (10/9)
- NIBs due Nov. 1st
- CDA-MG (Lisa R. Nelson, Linda Michaelsen )
- Vocab (Rob McClure)
- Publishing, Electronic Services and Tools (PEST) (Andrew Statler)
- Patient Care (Emma Jones)
- Example Task Force (https://cdasearch.hl7.org) (Brett Marquard)
- Review Project Proposals
- External Updates - ONC and others
- Project Updates
- Additional Items
- C-CDA Companion Guide Comment 2036 Brett Marquard
- 2036 disposed
- 2041 disposed
- Brett Marquard had a question about how to get the questions resolved on the STUs.
- Andrew Statler is going to take the lead in organizing progress with this group.
- ODH STU Update v1.1 Review(Lori Fourquet)
- You must be a member to be a review. There is a table to put in your comments.
- Digital Signatures STU Extension Request Digital Signatures and Delegation of Rights STU Extension Request (Natasha Kreisle)
- Publication Request for the Extension Request. Low Implementer Adoption so far. No challenges and no comments that require resolution. Length of extension of two years. This item was discussed at the WGM. Was discussed on the FM meeting. Related items. This would come back to SD to work on after the WGM. Extensions are normally 1 year.
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve extension of the Digital Signatures and Delegation of Rights STU
By Second Date Ref # Digital Signatures and Delegation of Rights STU Extension Request For 28 Neg 00 Abs 00 Status APPROVED
Tally 28-00-00 Discussion No additional discussion
Action Andrew Statlerto forward to the TSC.
- Extensions
- From the FM Agenda with SD at the WGM the minutes show that this will go back to SD to vote on. (Sept 22 at Noon 2020 SEP - FM Virtual WGM Agenda) (Natasha Kreisle)
- Finalizing CDA IG Quality Criteria (@Russ)
- ARCHIVE - 2019 MAY Ballot - CDA Implementation Guide Quality Criteria#2019MAYBallotReconciliationDraft
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve reconciliation as accepted
By Second Date Ref # For 26 Neg 00 Abs 01 Status APPROVED Tally 26-00-01 Discussion No Discussion
Action Russell Ott to approve the content in the Word document and then Andrew Statler will work with him to get it into Confluence.
- ARCHIVE - 2019 MAY Ballot - CDA Implementation Guide Quality Criteria#2019MAYBallotReconciliationDraft
- Current Status of CDA Standards review
- SDWG PBS Metrics next steps
- The Co-Chairs need to have another Co-Chairs call.
- Lisa R. Nelson has a CDA topic for UTG that needs to be reviewed for a future call that Sean McIlvenna is on prior to going to outside working groups like Vocab.
- C-CDA Companion Guide Comment 2036 Brett Marquard
- STU Comments
- Two Advance Directives Templates, Release 1 - US Realm STU comments: http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail.cfm?dstuid=223 (Lisa R. Nelson)
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve as disposed
By Second Date Ref # 2042 For 26 Neg 00 Abs 00 Status APPROVED
Tally 26-00-00 Discussion None
Action - 2043
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve as disposed
By Second Date Ref # For 25 Neg 00 Abs 00 Status APPROVED
Tally 25-00-00 Discussion None
Action - 2046
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve as disposed
By Second Date Ref # 2046 For 25 Neg 00 Abs 00 Status APPROVED
Tally 25-00-00 Discussion No additional discussion
Action - 2044
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve as disposed
By Second Date Ref # 2044 For 25 Neg 00 Abs 00 Status APPROVED
Tally 25-00-00 Discussion No additional discussion
Action Corrections need to be made to the schema. - Click here to expand...
STU
Last Updated
Commenter
Issue
2046 The existing "Draft as part of Advance Directives - Template Revisions" indicates that the publish flag was not indicated in Trifolia Workbench prior to publication. 2042 Lisa R. Nelson Value Set Update needs to be made. There is a DYNAMIC binding to
and two concepts previously requested in SCT have now been added. The value set definition needs to be updated and the expansion needs to be re-imported into Trifolia.
This change will be incorporated when the IG is next exported.
Codes to add to the definition:
Organ donation (procedure) 271298009 SNOMED CT 2.16.840.1.113883.6.96
Healthcare decision making (observable entity) 405083000 SNOMED CT 2.16.840.1.113883.6.96
urn:oid: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1115.5 (Advance Directive Content Type SCT)2043 One Constrain points to the use of two different value sets.
3332-30804
urn:oid: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1115.5 (Advance Directive Content Type SCT)
SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] value (ValueSet: Advance Directives Content Types urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.69.5 DYNAMIC) (CONF:3332-30804).
This one is correct.
urn:oid: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1115.5 (Advance Directive Content Type SCT) - 2045
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve as disposed
By Second Date Ref # 2045 For 24 Neg 00 Abs 00 Status APPROVED
Tally 24-00-00 Discussion No additional discussion
Action Corrections need to be made to the schema.
- Two PACP STU Comments http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail.cfm?dstuid=296 (Natasha Kreisle)
- HL7 CDA® R2 IG: C-CDA Templates for Clinical Notes DSTU Release 2.1 - US Realm
SD intended to allow:
- -- entry #1 = Advance Directive organizer
- -- entry #2 = Advance Directive observation
- -- entry #3 .....
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve as disposed
By Second Date Ref # For 29 Neg 00 Abs 02 Status APPROVED
Tally 29-00-02 Discussion none
Action - Click here to expand...
STU
Last Updated
Commenter
Issue
2047 Figure 137: Criticality Observation Example
<value xsi:type="CD" code="High" displayName="High Criticality - NEED PROPER
CODE" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.96"
codeSystemName="SNOMED CT"/>
Looks like we published this without ever fixing the code. The @code should be CRITH, the @displayName should be "high criticality", the @codeSystem should be 2.16.840.1.113883.5.10.63, and the @codeSystemName should be "HL7ObservationValue".2041 If section/@nullFlavor is not present SHALL contain an Advance Directive Observation OR an Advance Directive Organizer. If more than one entry is present, some may contain an Advance Directive Observation and others may contain an Advance Directive Organizer as long as each entry contains only one or the other (but not both). 2032 The following schematron asserts are untested, but seem easily testable:
1. a-81-7278-c
...
12. a-1198-7624-c2031 In the Physician Reading Study Performer (V2) template (urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.6.2.1:2014-06-09):
....
d. The id SHOULD include zero or one [0..1] id where id/@root="2.16.840.1.113883.4.6" National Provider Identifier (CONF:1098-32135).
It seems like we could clean up d. and standardize the templating a bit.2030 In the Diagnostic Imaging Report template:
If the DICOM Object Catalog section SHALL come first, then why not list it before the Findings section?
2029 In the Mental Stagus Organizer (V3) template (urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.75:2015-08-01):
a. The Organizer SHALL have at least one of code or effectiveTime (CONF:1198-32426).
Why does this exist? We already know the organizer SHALL have a code because of CONF:1198-14378, so I can't see a circumstance in which this statement ever does anything.2028 Typo (should be entryRelationship):
12. SHALL contain at least one [1..*] entryRelationships (CONF:1098-32782).
Note that this isn't tested in the schematron either, presumably because it was looking for an "entryRelationships" element. We should fix this in Trifolia and I think (hope?) that'll give us the schematron fix for free.2027 The schematron has the following assert for CONF:1098-7508:
<sch:assert id="a-1098-7508-c" test="cda:effectiveTime[@xsi:type='IVL_TS']">SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] effectiveTime (CONF:1098-7508) such that it</sch:assert>
IVL_TS certainly does seem like the most likely @xsi:type to have for the first effectiveTime here (in contrast with the second, which the IG says SHALL have type PIVL_TS or EIVL_TS), but the IG itself never mentions the first effectiveTime's type, so this seems strange.2023 Currently the CDA R2.0 specification and the C-CDA IG don't provide a way to semantically convey that the patient or an individual (a relatedPerson) is the Custodian of the information. 2021 Priyaranjan Tokachichu The schematron rule considers "assignedPerson or representedOrganizaton" logic, but not "assignedPerson or (assignedAuthoringDevice and representedOrganization)". This results in schematron failure of "author/assignedAuthor" in the header that has "assignedPerson" and "representedOrganization" (which is valid based on implied meaning of (CONF:1198-8457)). 2016 The Planned Intervention Act (V2) contains text in the template description that is logically correct due to the intent of the section to contain only planned events: “All interventions referenced in a Planned Intervention Act must have moodCodes indicating that that are planned (have not yet occurred).”
So, any moodCode OTHER THAN "EVN".2007 The current Payer Section "REQUIRES" (SHALL 1..*) a prior authorization. There will not always be an authorization every time coverage is used/communicated in the Payer Section. 1945 Encounter Diagnosis (V3)
[act: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.80:2015-08-01 (open)]
This template wraps relevant problems or diagnoses at the close of a visit or that need to be followed after the visit. If the encounter is associated with a Hospital Discharge, the Hospital Discharge Diagnosis must be used. This entry requires at least one Problem Observation entry.1885 @sueann svaby SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] code, which SHOULD be selected from ValueSet Social History Type urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.80.60 DYNAMIC (CONF:1198-8558).
a. If @codeSystem is not LOINC, then this code SHALL contain at least one [1..*] translation, which SHOULD be selected from CodeSystem LOINC (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.6.1) (CONF:1198-32951).1873 Encounter Diagnosis (V3)
[act: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.80:2015-08-01 (open)]
The template is missing a binding for statusCode.
Figure 144 shows a statusCode of "active". This provides the wrong guidance.1859 Please REMOVE/DEPRECATE this commentIn the errata release from June 2019,Figure 162 is wrong and needs to be updated to use the correct Code System OID for CVX 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.6. It currently shows as 2.16.840.1.113762.12.292 Care Plan (V2)
[ClinicalDocument: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.1.15:2015-08-01 (open)]
The CDA Care Plan represents an instance of this dynamic Care Plan at a point in time. The CDA document itself is NOT dynamic.
Key differentiators between a Care Plan CDA and CCD (another “snapshot in time” document): There are 2 required sections:
o Health Concerns o Interventions
There are 2 optional sections:
o Goals o Outcomes
• Provides the ability to identify patient and provider priorities with each act • Provides a header participant to indicate occurrences of Care Plan review A care plan document can include entry references from the information in these sections to the information (entries) in other sections.
Please see Volume 1 of this guide to view a Care Plan Relationship diagram and story board.1802 Smoking Status - Meaningful Use (V2) (urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.78:2014-06-09)
. This value SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @code, which SHALL be selected from ValueSet Smoking Status urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.38 DYNAMIC (CONF:1098-14817).We have trouble adding new Social History Observations when the US Gov't identifies the observation using LOINC. We really should be using LOINC in the code ("the question").
I recommend creating a Grouping Value Set that combines the original set of concepts using SNOMEDCT (Social History Type (SNOMEDCT)) and then agree to put all new/additional social history observation codes in the Social History Type (LOINC) value set. Use the existing OID for the new Grouping VS and make two new value sets for the parts of the grouping VS.1798 On page 392, Section 3.61.1, the last three sentences of the text read as follows:
"Procedure act is for procedures that alter the physical condition of a patient (e.g., splenectomy). Observation act is for procedures that result in new information about a patient but do not cause physical alteration (e.g., EEG). Act is for all other types of procedures (e.g., dressing change)."
This is different from the wording on page 390, Section 3.61 Procedures Section (entries optional) (V2). Updated language is in the proposed section below.1793 3.41 Immunization Medication Information (V2) includes SHALL have a manufactureMaterial where this code MAY contain zero or more [0..*] translation, which MAY be selected from ValueSet Vaccine Clinical Drug urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.8 DYNAMIC (CONF:1098-31543). *1791
3.41 Immunization Medication Information (V2) includes SHALL have a manufactureMaterial where this code MAY contain zero or more [0..*] translation, which MAY be selected from ValueSet Vaccine Clinical Drug urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.8 DYNAMIC (CONF:1098-31543). 1790 SHOULD contain exactly one [1..1] effectiveTime (CONF:1098-32943) such that it
a. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @operator="A" (CONF:1098-32945).
b. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @xsi:type="PIVL_TS" or "EIVL_TS" (CONF:1098-32946).*1789
We have seen real-world implementation defects where planned future encounters appear in the Encounters section rather than the Plan of Treatment section where they should be. I think some developers are just querying their database encounter tables for all encounters for a particular patient and sticking everything in the Encounters section regardless of whether they are past or future. Let's introduce a new conformance rule to ensure each Encounter activity ends before the document header effectiveTime. *1782
In section 3.81 Procedure Activity Procedure (V2) the Procedure.code (CONF:1098-7656) doesn't mention HCPCS as a possible code system. I think that code system should be explicitly listed because it is in common use in the US realm along with CPT-4. There are many procedures which are in HCPCS but not in CPT-4.
This @code SHOULD be selected from LOINC (CodeSystem: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1) or SNOMED CT (CodeSystem: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.96), and MAY be selected from CPT-4 (CodeSystem: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.12) or ICD10 PCS (CodeSystem: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.4) or CDT-2 (Code System: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.13) (CONF:1098-19207).1777 The value set for statusCode for Medication Supply Order (v2) include several codes that are incompatible with the equivalent statusCodes in the FHIR US Core profile for MedicationRequest (http://hl7.org/fhir/STU3/valueset-medication-request-status.html). 1776 The statusCode for Immunizations in the Immunization Activity (v3) allows for all values in the ActStatus urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.15933: 1775 The value set for status of Result Observation (V3) [Result Status urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.39 STATIC] is broadly incompatible with the FHIR US Core value sets for Observation status (http://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-observation-status.html) and DiagnosticReport status (http://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-diagnostic-report-status.html). Here are the values for reference: 1774 The ProcedureAct statusCode urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.22 STATIC 2014-04-23 used for statusCode in the Procedure Activity Procedure (V2) template currently has 4 values: 1773 In the Goal Observation template, the status is currently hardcoded to "active": 1772 The C-CDA 2.1 Problem Value Set (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.3221.7.4) allows only terms descending from the Clinical Findings (404684003) or Situation with Explicit Context (243796009) hierarchies. 1768 Currently the Personal and Legal Relationship Role Type Value set (2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.12.1) is missing some (about 10) concepts needed to align with the corresponding Value set used in FHIR RelatedPerson.Relationship. 1765 Template Improvement Request: 1764 New feature request 1762 SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] componentOf (CONF:1198-8386).
a. This componentOf SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] encompassingEncounter (CONF:1198-8387).1760 Smoking Status - Meaningful Use (V2)
[observation: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.78:2014-06-09 (open)]1758 Immunizations Section (entries required) (V3)
[section: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.2.1:2015-08-01 (open)]1757 In order to stay aligned with FHIR, the Birth Sex entry template needs to be modified to use the same value set for birth sex.
The value set is being established now in VSAC. We believe the OID will be OID: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1021.24.1752 Page 85-86: "There are 2 required sections: Health Concerns and Interventions
There are 2 optional sections: Goals and Outcomes"1693 Interventions Section (V3)
[section: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.21.2.3:2015-08-01 (open)]1691 Currently the infulfillmentOF/order in the header doesn't seem to allow for the semantics to indicate when the document contains information about the initiation of an order. It only seems to permit indicating when a document contains information about the fulfillment of an order. Where would I index in the header information about evidence within the document indicating an order was placed? 1642 This template represents the patient's home environment including, but not limited to, type of residence (trailer, single family home, assisted living), living arrangement (e.g., alone, with parents), and housing status (e.g., evicted, homeless, home owner). 1638 This sdtc:dischargeDispositionCode SHOULD contain exactly [0..1] codeSystem, which SHOULD be either CodeSystem: NUBC 2.16.840.1.113883.6.301.5 OR CodeSystem: HL7 Discharge Disposition 2.16.840.1.113883.12.112 (CONF:1198-32377). 1626 Because LOINC has deprecated the code 52521-1 the examples for Care Plan document should use the replacement code of 18776-5, and the sample code in the value set should be fixed to use 18776-5.
Duplicate to 1625 - made this by mistake and couldn't figure out how to delete it.1625 Because LOINC has deprecated the code 52521-2 the examples for Care Plan document should use the replacement code of 18776-5, and the sample code in the value set should be fixed to use 18776-5. 1623 Health Status Evaluations and Outcomes Section
[section: identifier urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.61 (open)]
This template represents observations regarding the outcome of care from the interventions used to treat the patient. These observations represent status, at points in time, related to established care plan goals and/or interventions.1611 There is a general need to do an overall clean-up the C-CDA IG to go through all value set definitions and make sure that the source information is correct.
As we have improved the availability of value set definitions and expansions in VSAC, the source may have changed from PHINVADS or some other organization.1607 @Eric Parapini In the template Immunization Activity Act (V3) (TemplateId: 2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.52:2015-08-01) there is an entryRelationship to the Instruction (V2) template (TemplateId: 2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.20:2014-06-09). 1606 @Eric Parapini I would like to request the LOINC code "80791-7" Nutrition and dietetics Plan of care note be added to the Care Plan Document Type value set (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1099.10) 1605 In the latest errata version (CDAR2_IG_CCDA_CLINNOTES_R1_DSTU2.1_2015AUG_Vol2_2018MAYwith_errata.pdf) on page128 (2.1.8 above number 4) that "Preferred code is 18748-4 LOINC Diagnostic Imaging Report" but per LOINC, that code will be deprecated in December 2018 1603 From the C-CDA Companion Guide Note Activity Template (Page 92 - 9(c)(ii)(1)):
The playingEntity, if present, SHALL contain zero or more [0..*] US Realm Person Name (PN.US.FIELDED) (identifier: urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.5.1.1) (CONF:3250-16929).1602 Allergy & intolerance template (2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.7), substance reactant binding (CONF:1098-7419)
The bound value set is very large, making it difficult to support for both entry and validation.1525 SHOULD contain zero or one [0..1] performer="PRF" Performer (CodeSystem: HL7ParticipationType urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.5.90 STATIC) (CONF:1198-8961) such that it 1516 Number of Pressure Ulcers Observation (V3)
[observation: identifier urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.76:2015-08-01 (open)]
This template represents the number of pressure ulcers observed at a particular stage.1515 @George Dixon Clinical Documentation Request we are unable to support. Medication Administration- Ability to display an administered dose with a cumulative dose. Use Case - For a given treatment timeframe when ordering and administering chemotherapy medications related to their toxicity it is important to know the patient's running dosage received. Depending on the clinical environments management of visits (acute versus repeat outpatient treatments) this may be within an encounter or across encounters for a given period of time. Need communicate most recent dose(s), Cumulative interval (low/high) and cumulative dose. 1513 Table 400: Health Insurance Type
Code System OID is wrong
ALSO WRONG IN THE LIST OF CODES SYSTEMS USED IN THE IG1510 Value Set: HealthcareServiceLocation urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.20275
A comprehensive classification of locations and settings where healthcare services are provided. This value set is based on the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) location code system that has been developed over a number of years through CDC's interaction with a variety of healthcare facilities and is intended to serve a variety of reporting needs where coding of healthcare service locations is required.1505 Currently in the Patient Generated Document Header
13. MAY contain zero or more [0..*] documentationOf (CONF:1198-28710).
The code should be selected from a value set established by the document-level template for a specific type of Patient Generated Document.1502 @Berge,Ruth The link in section 1.1.17 Progress Note (v3) in Table 49 (Progress Note (V3) Context) for " Allergies and Intolerances Section (entries optional) (V3) " goes to 2.4.1 Allergies and Intolerances Section (entries required) (V3). This is also true for the link in Table 53: Referral Note (V2) Constraints Overview . In Table 53 the Allergies section is assigned CONF# 1198- 30625. On page 195, in the details for Allergies there is another link that also goes to the wrong Allergies and Intolerance Section. 1470 This comment refers back to decisions made in Errata 1338.
Given a proposed alternative constraint was not provided/proposed by Regenstrief in time to be included in the September errata update for C-CDA R2.1, I supported leaving the errata change as had been proposed and implemented in the US Realm header template draft C-CDA R2.1 errata release (shown below):1452 Value Set X_ActRelationshipDocument is a new value set that came into existence during the C-CDA R2.1 Errata Update. It needs to be added to the CCDA Value Set Summary sheet maintained in the HL7 SDWG Workgroup Documents area. 1430 SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] templateId (CONF:81-8531) such that it
a. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.6.1.2"1429 3.34 Goal Observation
...
MAY contain zero or one [0..1] value (CONF:1098-32743).*1428
Section 3.23, page 483:
Table 272: EncounterTypeCode
Value Set: EncounterTypeCode urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.80.32
This value set includes only the codes of the Current Procedure and Terminology designated for Evaluation and Management (99200 – 99607) (subscription to AMA Required
Value Set Source: http://www.amacodingonline.com/1425 @Hyde,Linda Value Set Links in IG
A number of the links for value sets in the IG either no long work or point to the wrong location. For example several value set links send you to the VTSL Browser (veterinary service extension); the link for the country value set is no longer valid.1424 @Hyde,Linda Wound Measurements Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.20.2.5 (dynamic)
IG table says 'A value set of SNOMED-CT codes to capture the dimensions of a wound' but the value set is using LOINC codes.1422 @Hyde,Linda Procedure Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.80.28 (dynamic)
This value set is referenced in the IG but does not appear in the list of value sets in the appendix or as it's own table. It appears in the section for 'performer for the value of service event code' pg 169,182. Value set covers all values under the 71388002 Procedure. It is in VSAC and in the R2.1 Value Set Download from VSAC.1421 @Hyde,Linda Pressure Point Value Set 2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.36 (static)
VSAC and Trifolia only have one code in common. Trifolia codes are for the site 'structure' and VSAC for 'skin structure of'. The IG value set table contains the same codes as Trifolia. The purpose of this value set is to identify the areas of the body generally associated with pressure ulcers so it would seem that 'skin structure of' would be the more appropriate concepts to use.1420 @Hyde,Linda Planned moodcode (Observation)Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.25 (static)
VSAC contains code for GOL (goal). This code is not in the IG table. It is in the ActMood table.1419 @Hyde,Linda ParticipationFunction Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.10267 (static)
There are new codes in the ParticipationFunction code system that are not in VSAC.1418 @Hyde,Linda Observation Interpretation (HL7)Value set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.78 (static)
1. There is a new version of ObservationInterpretation with additional codes that are not in VSAC and several codes in VSAC that are now deprecated.
2. Code system name in IG is HITSP-CS-83 but in VSAC it is ObservationInterpretation. IG should be updated1417 @Hyde,Linda INDRoleClassCodes Value set. 2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.33
The implementation contains references to both static and dynamic for this value set. Pages 62,97,144,157 refer to this value set as STATIC, however on page 204 it is listed as DYNAMIC.1416 @Hyde,Linda EntityPersonNamePartQualifier Value Set 2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.26(static)
LS legal status)code is not in VSAC. In the original version of the code system it was include but in a separate level. All the codes under _ PersonNamePartQualifier are in VSAC.1415 @Hyde,Linda Entity Name Use Value Set 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.15913 (static)
All values of the EntityNameUse code system are in VSAC except OR (official registry).This code was not in the original code system but is in V3.1414 @Hyde,Linda Allergy and Intolerance Type Value Set 2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.3221.6.2 (dynamic) *1406
<!-- ************************ ENCOUNTERS *********************** -->
<component>
<section>
<!-- *** Encounters section (entries required) (V3) *** -->
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.22.1" extension="2015-08-01"/>
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.2.22.1"/>I think there is a problem with the sample CCD file C-CDA_R2-1_CCD.xml included in this package.
1381 doseQuanity/@unit and administrationUnitCode/@code are a confusing set of elements, but I will do my best pulling from the base definitions: 1370 In the Comment Activity template (2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.64):
5. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] text (CONF:81-9430).
a. This text SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] reference (CONF:81-15967).
- (expand HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: C-CDA Templates for Clinical Notes Companion Guide, Release 2 STU - US Realm )
- Where are V3 artifacts being archived? We need to take this offline and find this out.
- The extension is not in the header.
- C:/Documents and Settings/kreislera/My Documents/HL7/Documents/CDA_R2?NormativeWebEdition2005/infrastructure/cda/graphics/L-POCD_RM000040.gif
- It's not part of the base CDA schema. It needs to be added to the extension schema.
- When Sarah adds to the schema, she edits the ...
- github.com/HL7/cda-core-2.0/blob/master/shema/etensions/SDTC/infrastructure/cda/POCD_MT000040_SDTC.xsd
Will update CONF:4435-169 from functionCode to sdtc:functionCode.
Will add the sdtc prefix to the extension schema to make it sdtc:functionCode
The edit will be made to github here:
https://github.com/HL7/cda-core-2.0/blob/master/schema/extensions/SDTC/infrastructure/cda/POCD_MT000040_SDTC.xsd
10/8/2020 - SDWG Approved
Brett/Matt - 30-0-0Type Motion Motion Motion to approve as disposed
By Second Date Ref # 2036 For 30 Neg 00 Abs 00 Status APPROVED
Tally 30-00-00 Discussion No additional discussion
Action Corrections need to be made to the schema.
- Click here to expand...
STU
Last Update
Commenter
Comment
2036 b. SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] functionCode, which SHALL be selected from ValueSet urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1099.30 DYNAMIC (CONF:4435-169). 2014 The Note Types Value Set (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.68) version 20191017 is missing three note types specific in USCDI v1: 1996 In Appendix C, I read the Provenance - Author Participation template as saying you can use the same trick as in the standard C-CDA Author Participation template to reference an author already defined elsewhere in the document:
The assignedAuthor/id may be set equal to (a pointer to) an id on a participant elsewhere in the document (header or entries) or a new author participant can be described here.(Vocab issue)
Table 9 of the Companion Guide recommends the LOINC codes 11502-2 for Laboratory Narrative notes and 11526-1 for Pathology Narrative notes. However, these codes aren't actually included in the Note Types value set (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.68) as required by the Notes Section and Note Activity templates in Appendix A. Likewise, although no specific LOINC code is recommended for Imaging Narrative notes, the value set doesn't include any codes from the value set recommended for imaging notes in Table 8 (urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.12009.10.2.5).For the UDI information, can we get clarification on whether it is possible to send other information when we do not have the DI information? Appendix B UDI
1.1 UDI OrganizerFigure 1: Unique Device Identifier (UDI) Organizer Template ID root is incorrect
- Two Advance Directives Templates, Release 1 - US Realm STU comments: http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail.cfm?dstuid=223 (Lisa R. Nelson)
11:00am ET
- Value Set Updates- Rob McClure
- This can be removed as a standing item.
- We do need to discuss ValueSet items for SNOMED CT
- ValueSet - USCDI vs. CDA.
- Substance (Drug Class) vs. SNOMEDInternational
- NDRFT is no longer maintained. It replaced by MDR. NDRFT has 13,000 concepts.
- The content will change. A new version of the ValueSet will be published. The OID will not change. The
Type Motion Motion Motion to approve as disposed
By Second Date Ref # 2034 For 23 Neg 00 Abs 00 Status APPROVED
Tally 23-00-00 Discussion No additional discussion
Action
- Adjournment
- 12:01pm
- This can be removed as a standing item.
Copyright © Health Level Seven International ® ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The reproduction of this material in any form is strictly forbidden without the written permission of the publisher.