Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
| Electronic Case Reporting Update | John Loonsk | - CDA eICR STU 3.0 and FHIR eCR STU 2.0 are in alignment
- Both have dependencies on US Core, ODH FHIR and the US Public Health Profile Library (USPHPL) references
- eCR covers over 100 legally reported conditions
- Since Covid, there are 8800 facilities sending Covid eCRs
- 8.2 million eCRs have been delivered to 64 public health agencies, the majority are CDAs
- Public health agencies are at varying capacity to receive and process the XML
- There are agencies needing the HTML version and are not consuming the XML
|
| US Public Health Profiles Library Context Review | John Loonsk | - A subgroup of PH members have been working on the library and reporting back to the PH work group.
- eCR, MedMedmorph and Vital Records have been working on harmonizing the FHIR IGs.
The US Public Health Profiles Library will be a collection of reusable architecture and content profiles representing common public health concepts and patterns. It is intended as a complement to US Core that is used to ease implementation burden of healthcare organizations, electronic health record companies, public health agencies, and others involved in the US public health endeavor. - The short-term scope of this library will include elements common to eCR and MedMorph FHIR IGs and will define a US Realm specific framework that defines common elements for the implementation guides. The longer-term scope of this will include analysis and inclusion of data elements from vital records death reporting, birth and fetal death reporting, and other Public Health use cases.
- A draft project proposal has been drafted and was reviewed.
- Motion: PH WG agrees to accept the draft project proposal John Loonsk/Erin Holt 20-0-0
|
| US Public Health Library List | Sarah Gaunt | - The subgroup has developed a list of 50 profiles for inclusion in the library.
- The profiles are categorized into two categories, content and architecture.
- The list includes recommendation from the subgroup:
- Yes, include: profile suitable as is for inclusion in PH Library
- No, do not include: definitely not a candidate
- Yes, with mods: changes to the profile need to be made
- Needs more discussion
- 36 were determined to need more discussion
- The content profiles needing further discussion were reviewed. Items 9, 10 and 11.
- The purpose of the review is to get to the point to decide what will be in eCR and Medmorph to get to ballot.
- It was decided a small group will continue to go through the list and bring it to the work group for final review.
- The list will be sent via the listserv in advance of the WG meeting.
|