Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Date


Professional Associations that bring together competing entities, such as HL7, are subject to strict scrutiny under applicable antitrust laws. HL7 recognizes that the antitrust laws were enacted to promote fairness in competition and, as such, supports laws against monopoly and restraints of trade and their enforcement. Each individual participating in HL7 activities, regardless of venue, is responsible for knowing the contents of and adhering to the HL7 Antitrust policy as stated in §05.01 of the Governance and Operations Manual (GOM).

Attendees


Name

Affiliation

Aaron Ling CDPH
AbdulMalik Shakir Hi3 Solutions
Becky Angeles Carradora Health
Craig Newman Altarum
Crystal Snare APHL
Cynthia (Cindy) Bush CDC/NCHS
Dan Rutz Epic
Erin Holt TN Dept of Health
Fikru Mekonnen CDC
Genny Luensman ATL, Inc. (Contractor for CDC/NIOSH)
Inder TDH
Jamie Parker Carradora
Justine Maxwell TN DOH
Karen Knight NAACCR, Inc.
Kathleen Tully ONC
Kathy Walsh Labcorp
Kristi Eckerson HLN Consulting, LLC
Laura A Conn CDC CSELS
Laura Rappleye Altarum
Maria Michaels CDC
Matt Rahn HHS/ONC
Mike Flanigan Carradora Health
Nagesh Bashyam www.drajer.com
Ravi Kafle WA DOH
Sarah Gaunt Lantana Consulting Group





Goals

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5 minWelcome, agenda review, meeting minute approval 
  • No additions to the agenda
  • Minutes from last week were approved by consensus
  • Ravi Kafle from Washington will replace AbdulMalik Shakir as a WG co-chair
15 minUS Public Health Profiles LibrarySarah
  • Deferred
15 minMedMorph related publication requests (Ref Arch and Cancer Content IG)Dragon
15 minWithdraw Request for V3 Immunization standardDanny
  • Retire Normative Standard: HL7 Version 3 Standard: Immunization, R1
  • Every 5 years, normative standards need to be retired or re-affirmed
  • Per Joginder Madra and Ron Parker, the only known implementations of v3 immunization is in Alberta Canada
    • Exchange is stable and no updates to the standards are expected
  • Previous discussion on this call led to a conclusion that the standard can be retired
  • A withdrawal specific ballot is needed for normative standards
    • Opportunity for feedback from the larger community about retiring the standard
  • A PSS is required to retire the normative standard
    • Doesn't need the normal steps for a project
    • Many of the fields aren't particularly applicable (lots of "n/a"s)
  • Motion to approve the PSS to retire the standard (Danny Wise/Erin Holt 27-0-2)
  • Danny will send to HQ








Action items

  •