Dial-in Number phone: 669-900-6833, meeting 3231998494# voip/iOS/Android: tel:+16699006833,,3231998494# US (San Jose CA) Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbxHfAjJot | Web session
|
Attendees
Name | Organization | NCPDP/HL7 | present | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scott Robertson | Kaiser Permanente | scott.m.robertson@kp.org | NCPDP/HL7 | x |
Cathy Graeff | SAG | NCPDP | ||
Kristol Chism | Change Healthcare | kristol.chism@changehealthcare.com | NCPDP | |
Margaret Weiker | NCPDP | mweiker@ncpdp.org | NCPDP | |
Kristina McCann | CoverMyMeds | kmccann@covermymeds.com | NCPDP | |
Leann Lewis | EHR Data | leann.lewis@ehrdata.com | NCPDP | |
Susan M Rhodus | GeriMed, Inc. | srhodus@gerimedgso.com | NCPDP | |
Shelly Spiro | Pharmacy HIT Collaborative | shelly@pharmacyhit.org | NCPDP/HL7 | |
Gary Schoettmer | NetRx LLC | gary@netrx.org | NCPDP | |
Sandi Mitchell | VA | Sandra.mitchell@va.gov | HL7 | |
Scotty Armstead | scotty.armstead@pharmbot.us | NCPDP | ||
John Hatem | Independent Consultant | HL7 | ||
Joe Quinn | Smile CDR | joseph.quinn@smilecdr.com | HL7 | |
Agenda Items and Notes | Working & Reference Documents | ||
---|---|---|---|
|
Discussion
FHIR IG vs Guidance Document
- During the HL7 May 2022 WGM, Pharmacy WG strongly suggested to create a FHIR IG rather than a guidance document. The thought being that a FHIR IG would be more visible to the vendors using FHIR.
- Subsequently, I started the paperwork to alter the PSS and establish a FHIR IG
- It was pointed out to me that I agreed to the IG, but the group was not asked
- On the June 2nd Consultant Pharmacist Interoperability call, the group discussed the issue and decided to stay with a guidance document
Tasks/Status
Editorial Issues
- review/change LTPAC-specific language to be more general (not within use cases) (sections 1-3) - Gary
- Sections 1-3
FHIR IG Progress
create FHIR development environmentestablish FHIR repositoryupdate PSSdraftPharmacy approvalStrucDoc approvalopen reviewTSC approval
FHIR IG requestdraftPharmacy approvalStrucDoc approvalopen reviewFHIR-I approval
Review for the correct mapping to CCDA and FHIR
- review header FHIR (section 5.1 / US Realm Header C-CDA_FHIR Mapping.docx) - compare to StructureDefinition-US-Realm-Header.html
- compare optionality in section 5 with optionality in FHIR Consultation Note
- review header CCDA content (section 5.1 / US Realm Header C-CDA_FHIR Mapping.docx) - compare to C-CDA US Realm Header
- compare optionality in section 5 with optionality in C-CDA Consultation Note
- review mapping FHIR ↔ CCDA (need to determine how to review)
vocabulary and constraint issues
- identify all code sets/vocabularies (section 5) - where a field is assigned to a specific set of terms. are these SNOMED, LOINC, HL7, NCPDP
- identify all constraints (section 5) - where a field is set to a (one and only one) specific value. are these SNOMED, LOINC, HL7, NCPDP
New use cases
senior living
- specialty pharmacy
- pharmacy clinic (geriatric, CHF, diabetes, etc.)
- pharmacogenomics
- potentially Part D MTM: CMR patient take-away format specified by CMS. no consult note required, no regulatory requirement to communicate output to other clinicians; some?/most?/all? Programs have some type of reporting (similar to a consultation note). Is this something to include/suggest in the document.
How does information blocking apply?
- the information must be provided (available) to the patient
- if appropriately asked (other than patient - payer, clinician, etc.), information must be provided
- includes routine "search requests" for information that may be available
- is it "blocking" if the information is not generally released?? If you don't know where to send the information, is it blocking?
- information can/should/must be provided in a form that addresses USCDI data classes and clinical document types
- FAQs https://www.healthit.gov/curesrule/resources/information-blocking-faqs?options=2450b60a-e96a-4f4c-ab17-40aac81e40be
- Consultation Note 11488-4
- Discharge Summary Note 18842-5
- History and Physical 34117-2
- Procedure Note 28570-0
- Progress Note 11506-3
- Imaging Narrative 18748-4
- Do we need to include something about information blocking in our document?
- not at this time