Patient Requests for Corrections FHIR Implementation Guide Project

Interested Parties and Co-Sponsors: These should be workgroups.  I think we should encourage cosponsors and interested parties.  I think Patient Care and Patient Administration would be good examples here.  Also, perhaps Emergency Care would like to be an interested party.  And perhaps CBCP or Security have an angle.

Project Scope currently says: Now that patients are able to retrieve their records via the FHIR API, there will be more focus on incorrect/missing data in the EHR. HIPAA gives the right to a patient to request amendments to their chart. The old way is via a paper request. We would like to provide a new electronic way using FHIR.

This sounds more like Project Need.  I recommend we move this to Project Need and change to:

Now that patients are able to retrieve their records via the FHIR API, there will be more focus on incorrect/missing data in the EHR. Laws such as the US HIPAA law gives the right to a patient to request amendments to their chart. The old way is via a paper request. We would like to provide a new electronic way using FHIR.

I think Project Scope should say:  Create a FHIR implementation guide to support the ability for patients to electronically communicate corrections to their information via FHIR with a focus on the US HIPAA law use case.

I think those currently listed under interested parties could be stakeholders.