1c. Is Your Project an Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite)?
1d. Is your Project Artifact being Reaffirmed or proceeding to Normative directly after being either Informative or STU?
1e. Today's Date
1f. Name of standard being reaffirmed
1g. Project Artifact Information
1h. ISO/IEC Standard to Adopt
1i. Does the standard include excerpted text from one or more ISO, IEC or ISO/IEC standards, but is not an identical or modified adoption?
1j. Unit of Measure
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Patient Care
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Public Health
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2d. Project Facilitator
Mike Padula, Michael Tan
2e. Other Interested Parties (and roles)
2f. Modeling Facilitator
Lilian Minne
2g. Publishing Facilitator
2h. Vocabulary Facilitator
Rob Hausam
2i. Domain Expert Representative
Mike Padula, Craig Newman
2j. Business Requirements Analyst
2k. Conformance Facilitator
2l. Other Facilitators
Shovan Roy, David Barnet, Ca
2m. Implementers
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3a. Project Scope
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data. ( legal questions are excluded).
[another option (MP): Goal of the project is provide guidance in handling data relevant to the fetus in order to facilitate making those data available at the time of birth. Ultrasonographic and other imaging findings, pertinent genetic and labor
[What about (AG)]: not only at time of birth but also for youth health care (as preventive care) in where the child is monitored?
[AG] are the the data of a healthy fetus and/or child considered as within scope of the project? See powerpoint.
Attachments
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.
[alternate option_MP: Information relevant to fetus....]
[AG] In the discussion in the expertgroup in the Netherlands the fetus is considered as a seperate entity. therefore the Patient can be used for the fetus. However, in different countries the week from which this is can be different. In the expertgroep 20 weeks of gestation is mentioned.
3c. Security Risk
No
3d. External Drivers
Babyconnect ( NL),
3e. Objectives/Deliverables and Target Dates
FHIR implementation guides, profiles
3f. Common Names / Keywords / Aliases:
Fetus model, body site, obstetrics
3g. Lineage
3h. Project Dependencies
3i. HL7-Managed Project Document Repository URL:
3j. Backwards Compatibility
No
3k. Additional Backwards Compatibility Information (if applicable)
3l. Using Current V3 Data Types?
3l. Reason for not using current V3 data types?
3m. External Vocabularies
3n. List of Vocabularies
3o. Earliest prior release and/or version to which the compatibility applies
4b. For FHIR IGs and FHIR Profiles, what product version(s) will the profiles apply to?
4c. FHIR Profiles Version
4d. Please define your New Product Definition
4d. Please define your New Product Family
5a. Project Intent
White Paper
5a. White Paper Type
Balloted Informative
5a. Is the project adopting/endorsing an externally developed IG?
5a. Externally developed IG is to be (select one)
5a. Specify external organization
5a. Revising Current Standard Info
5b. Project Ballot Type
Informative
5c. Additional Ballot Info
5d. Joint Copyright
5e. I understand I must submit a Joint Copyright Letter of Agreement to the TSC in order for the PSS to receive TSC approval.
no
6a. External Project Collaboration
6b. Content Already Developed
6c. Content externally developed?
6d. List Developers of Externally Developed Content
6e. Is this a hosted (externally funded) project?
6f. Stakeholders
6f. Other Stakeholders
6g. Vendors
EHR, PHR, Health Care IT
6g. Other Vendors
6h. Providers
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6h. Other Providers
6i. Realm
Universal
7d. US Realm Approval Date
7a. Management Group(s) to Review PSS
FHIR
7b. Sponsoring WG Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 2 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 3 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 4 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 5 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 6 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 7 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 8 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 9 Approval Date
7c. Co-Sponsor 10 Approval Date
7e. CDA MG Approval Date
7f. FMG Approval Date
7g. V2 MG Approval Date
7h. Architecture Review Board Approval Date
7i. Steering Division Approval Date
7j. TSC Approval Date
 Show Changes
Version
8
Modifier
Anneke Goossen-Baremans
Modify Date
Feb 22, 2022 11:53
1a. Project Name
CHOICE Guideline for the use of a Fetal Resource
1b. Project ID
1746
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Patient Care
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Public Health
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2d. Project Facilitator
Mike Padula, Michael Tan
2f. Modeling Facilitator
Lilian Minne
2h. Vocabulary Facilitator
Rob Hausam
2i. Domain Expert Representative
Mike Padula, Craig Newman
2l. Other Facilitators
Shovan Roy, David Barnet, Ca
2m. Implementers
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3a. Project Scope
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data. ( legal questions are excluded).
[another option (MP): Goal of the project is provide guidance in handling data relevant to the fetus in order to facilitate making those data available at the time of birth. Ultrasonographic and other imaging findings, pertinent genetic and labor
[What about (AG)]: not only at time of birth but also for youth health care (as preventive care) in where the child is monitored?
[AG] are the the data of a healthy fetus and/or child considered as within scope of the project? See powerpoint.
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.
[alternate option_MP: Information relevant to fetus....]
[AG] In the discussion in the expertgroup in the Netherlands the fetus is considered as a seperate entity. therefore the Patient can be used for the fetus. However, in different countries the week from which this is can be different. In the expertgroep 20 weeks of gestation is mentioned.
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7a. Management Group(s) to Review PSS
FHIR
Version
7
Modifier
Dave Hamill
Modify Date
Dec 15, 2021 17:47
1a. Project Name
CHOICE Guideline for the use of a Fetal Resource
1b. Project ID
1746
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Patient Care
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Public Health
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2d. Project Facilitator
Mike Padula, Michael Tan
2f. Modeling Facilitator
Lilian Minne
2h. Vocabulary Facilitator
Rob Hausam
2i. Domain Expert Representative
Mike Padula, Craig Newman
2l. Other Facilitators
Shovan Roy, David Barnet, Ca
2m. Implementers
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3a. Project Scope
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data. ( legal questions are excluded).
[another option (MP): Goal of the project is provide guidance in handling data relevant to the fetus in order to facilitate making those data available at the time of birth. Ultrasonographic and other imaging findings, pertinent genetic and labor
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.
[alternate option_MP: Information relevant to fetus....]
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7a. Management Group(s) to Review PSS
FHIR
Version
6
Modifier
Michael Tan
Modify Date
Nov 02, 2021 08:24
1a. Project Name
CHOICE Guideline for the use of a Fetal Resource
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Patient Care
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Public Health
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2d. Project Facilitator
Mike Padula, Michael Tan
2f. Modeling Facilitator
Lilian Minne
2h. Vocabulary Facilitator
Rob Hausam
2i. Domain Expert Representative
Mike Padula, Craig Newman
2l. Other Facilitators
Shovan Roy, David Barnet, Ca
2m. Implementers
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3a. Project Scope
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data. ( legal questions are excluded).
[another option (MP): Goal of the project is provide guidance in handling data relevant to the fetus in order to facilitate making those data available at the time of birth. Ultrasonographic and other imaging findings, pertinent genetic and labor
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.
[alternate option_MP: Information relevant to fetus....]
Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health)
6i. Realm
Universal
7a. Management Group(s) to Review PSS
FHIR
Version
5
Modifier
Michael Padula
Modify Date
Oct 19, 2021 15:05
1a. Project Name
CHOICE Guideline for the use of a Fetal Resource
2a. Primary/Sponsor WG
Patient Care
2b. Co-Sponsor WG
Public Health
2c. Co-Sponsor Level of Involvement
Request formal content review prior to ballot
2d. Project Facilitator
Mike Padula, Michael Tan
2f. Modeling Facilitator
Lilian Minne
2h. Vocabulary Facilitator
Rob Hausam
2i. Domain Expert Representative
Mike Padula, Craig Newman
2l. Other Facilitators
Shovan Roy, David Barnet, Ca
2m. Implementers
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3a. Project Scope
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data. ( legal questions are excluded).
[another option (MP): Goal of the project is provide guidance in handling data relevant to the fetus in order to facilitate making those data available at the time of birth. Ultrasonographic and other imaging findings, pertinent genetic and labor
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.
[alternate option_MP: Information relevant to fetus....]
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data. ( legal questions are excluded).
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data.
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data.
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.
Goal of the project is to provide guidance in handling of fetal data.
3b. Project Need
A fetus is not considered as a patient, Some use body-site of the mother as an alternative, but this has drawbacks. Part of the project is to consider a simplified resource of a patient, which could evolve into a real patient, once the child is born.