Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Meeting coordinates

Phone Number: +1 563-999-2090
Participant Passcode: 792564#
https://join.freeconferencecall.com/patientcare

Attendance

George Dixon
Jay Lyle 
Laura Heerman Langford
Emma Jones
Mike Padula
Chris Melo
Stephen Chu
Thom Kuhn
Rob Hausam

Agenda

  1. Identify items to exclude from block votes
  2. Get through some block votes
  3. Address excluded items

Block 1: Affirmative - Typo
Persuasive
4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 81, 94, 100, 102, 106, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 120
not persuasive - 21
pending input - 61

Other Affirmative votes
Block 2:
considered for future use
1, 107 - more nutrition content. See also 63-65.
2 - 'no nutrition diagnosis at this time': this is a null value; may consider applicability if further work funded.
33 - put example maps online
41 - engage example task force
56 - provide all examples in all paradigms
57 - provide templates for mapping gaps
58, 59 - provide examples for MU2015

answered
60 - provide examples to FHIR
no action
3 - vsac

Block 3:
persuasive
7, 26 - add explanation for "close-to-user form"
12 - clarify definition of 'modifier'
22 - specify "FHIR" Condition resource
25 - coordinate (87 - consolidate) sections 4 & 5
31 - edit source list
35 - remove "prima facie"
37 - explicitly advise against double negatives
39, 55 - include explicit advice
62 - define impedance
63 - add food preferences
64 - add NPO count case
65 - add 'not eating' case
66 - edit 'patient engagement'
69 - clean up paste errors
71 - sort examples by category
74 - add time to risk text
76 - clarify pattern presentation
78 - expand discussion of attributes under negation
79 - caption and number tables
80 - add abatement time example
83 - clarify 'transient'
90 - forward-looking conclusion
91 - remove "never"
93, 129 - address issue of time & state more centrally
108 - typo
119 - edit
126 - fuller explanation of patterns

Block 4:
not persuasive
11 - keep terms in glossary
32 - combine use case list with maps
38 - add advice to passage
40 - add examples (already there)
72 - edit

Block 5:
persuasive with mod
19 - restructure. we plan to consolidate some text, but not to restructure document or remove discussion.
20 - see 19
36 - provide example? refer to prior example.
75 - simplify outline. Will try.
77 - clarify "broadest" - removed instead
82 - clarify truth-value discussion
89 - transition to section 6 (may be as much about the end of 5 as the beginning of 6)

Items for discussion
17 - modal verbs. This isn't a spec, but we do want to be clear.
67 - how to classify 'consent not given'
68 - does this table help?
73 - do we need to add explanation to document?
86 - does Boolean argument taint the quantitative pattern?
105 - does this comment require a change?
109 - need a general term for "patient not aligned with provider rec for some reason"

Minutes

  1. Motion to accept block one: Mike Padula, George Dixon. Vote: 6-0-0
  2. Motion to accept block two: Laura Heerman Langford, Thom Khun. Vote: 7-0-0
  3. Motion to accept block three: Laura Heerman Langford, Thom Khun. Vote: 7-0-1
    1. annotate 74 - 'remove' not 'add' time
    2. "transient" misnumbered as 83; should be 84. 83 voted previously.
  4. Motion to accept block four: Laura Heerman Langford, Mike Padula. Vote: 8-0-0
    1. 38 confirm (or write) similar statement earlier; refer back.
  5. Motion to accept block five Laura Heerman Langford, Thom Khun. Vote: 8-0-0
  6. Jay to tag items for clarification so group can review once drafted.
  7. We reviewed the items for discussion briefly and plan to complete them in Sydney, Wed Q4.
    1. Add #87 to this list.

Action Items

Participants to review last batch for discussion in Sydney

Jay to draft revisions

Next meeting

WQ4 at WGM

  • No labels