Warning:
Do not launch ANY of the links while your are in create or edit mode. There is a good chance all of your work will be gone.
Template Usage Information:
- Submit template change requests to PMO@HL7.org
- For Reaffirmations, please refer to the FAQ in Hl7 Project Scope Statement Instructions for a list of which sections and fields should be completed
Project Name and ID
Enter the name of the project here: | ||||||||||
Project Insight ID: | Project Insight ID: 1690 (https://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1690) Project Proposal in Jira: https://jira.hl7.org/browse/PSS-1680 | |||||||||
Complete this section for all “Direct to Normative” ballot projects and when a project proceeds from “Informative to Normative” or “STU to Normative”. Forward PSS to the TSC (via tscpm@HL7.org); this triggers American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Project Initiation Notification (PINS) submission. | ||||||||||
| TSC Notification: Informative/STU to Normative | Date: Submission date | ||||||||
| - or - Direct to Normative (no STU) (includes reaffirmations) | 12/9/2020 | ||||||||
Identify ISO, IEC or ISO/IEC standard to be adopted in text box below | ||||||||||
Enter info here if an ISO, IEC, or ISO/IEC Standard is to be adopted as an American National Standard; Enter the designation of the standard(s) to be adopted: | ||||||||||
Includes text from ISO, IEC or ISO/IEC standard: Check here if this standard includes excerpted text from one or more ISO, IEC or ISO/IEC standards, but is not an identical or modified adoption. | Yes |
| No | |||||||
Select the unit of measure used in the standard; if no measurements are in the standard, select N/A |
| N/A |
| U.S. | Metric |
| Both | |||
| Investigative Project (aka PSS-Lite) | Date : | ||||||||
Check this box when the project is investigative or exploratory in nature, which allows limited project scope definition. Sections 1-Project Name, 2-Sponsoring Group(s)/Project Team, 3a-Project Scope, 3b-Project Need, 3e-Project Objectives/Deliverables/Target Dates, 3i-Project Document Repository, 6b-[Realm, if known], and 6d-[applicable Approval Dates] are required for Investigative Project. Investigative Project specific instructions are highlighted in yellow. An investigative project must advance in two WGM cycles, requiring a full scope statement. Otherwise the project will be closed. |
2. Sponsoring Group(s) / Project Team
2.a. Primary Sponsor/Work Group
Primary Sponsor/Work Group | Patient Administration |
2.b. Co-sponsor Work Group(s)
Co-sponsor Work Group(s): (Enter co-sponsor approval dates in Section 6.d Project Approval Dates) | Payer/Provider Information Exchange | |
Indicate the level of involvement that the co-sponsor will have for this project: | ||
X | Request formal content review prior to ballot | |
X | Request periodic project updates. Specify period | Monthly |
Co-sponsor Work Group | Financial Management | |
Indicate the level of involvement that the co-sponsor will have for this project | ||
X | Request formal content review prior to ballot | |
X | Request periodic project updates. Specify period | Monthly |
Interested Parties | Orders and Observations Security CIC CARIN |
2.c. Project Team
All names should have confirmed their role in the project prior to submission to the TSC.
Project facilitator (1Mandatory) | Robert Dieterle |
Other interested parties and their roles | |
Multi-disciplinary project team (recommended) | |
Modeling facilitator | |
Publishing facilitator | |
Vocabulary facilitator | Rob McClure |
Domain expert rep | Gail Kocher |
Business requirement analyst | MaryKay McDaniel |
Conformance facilitator (for IG projects) | TBD |
Other facilitators (SOA, etc) | |
Implementers (2Mandatory for STU projects) FHIR Project Note: The implementer requirement will be handled by the “balloting” project. Therefore work groups do not fill out the above section. However, feel free to list implementers specific to your work group’s resources if you know of any. | |
1) MITRE | |
2) CMS |
3. Project Definition
3.a. Project Scope
Create FHIR based standards for 1) the exchange of validated healthcare directory information in a federated access environment based on the Validated Healthcare Directory standard localized for the US Realm using work completed for the PDex Plan Net FHIR IG (includes 11-14 in drawing below), 2) query for FHIR endpoints from any federated directory instance (includes 15-16 in the drawing below), and 3) submitting attested information to the validated directory and verifying the information against primary sources (includes 1-10 in drawing below). |
3.b. Project Need
This project is needed to provide standards for the population, validation, exchange and query of a federated access national healthcare directory. It will 1) minimize the burden on providers in supplying this information to multiple payers, healthcare organizations, and professional societies, 2) improve the quality of demographic and relationship information associated with healthcare organizations and individuals, 3) provide a reliable source of electronic endpoints to facilitate the exchange of healthcare information (e.g. patient records and referrals). In particular, the standards will facilitate the creation, population, and use of a national resource to support the scaling of FHIR based exchanges to support more efficient and better informed delivery of health care services |
3.c. Security Risks
Will this project produce executable(s), for example, schemas, transforms, style sheets, executable program, etc. If so the project must review and document security risks. Refer to the Cookbook for Security Considerations for additional guidance, including sample spreadsheets that may be used to conduct the security risk assessment. | Yes | |
X | No | |
Unknown |
3.d. External Drivers
Providing electronically access to FHIR endpoints to facilitate scaling FHIR based solutions in response to both CMS and ONC Final Rules |
3.e. Project Objectives / Deliverables / Target Dates
Within each row, enter the explicit work product(s) / objective(s). Indicate their target date at the right in WGM/Ballot Cycle format. Include the project end date as the last objective (for standards projects, the end date will be the projected ANSI approval date). | Target Date(in WGM or ballot cycle format, e.g. ‘2017 Sept WGM’ or ‘2017 Jan Ballot’) |
Enter objective/deliverable here. All planned ballots and their target dates should be included The example below is a "STU to Normative" path | Enter Target Date |
Submit Exchange IG for STU Ballot (First Ballot Cycle) Submit Query IG for STU Ballot (First Ballot Cycle) Submit Attestation/Validation IG for Comment Ballot (First Ballot Cycle) | 2022 Sept Ballot |
Complete reconciliation on Query IG STU and submit publication request | 2022 December |
Complete reconciliation on Exchange IG STU and submit publication request | 2023 January |
Complete reconciliation on Attestation/Validation IG and ballot for STU | 2023 January |
Complete reconciliation on Attestation/Validation IG STU and submit publication request | 2023 May |
STU 2 ballot for all three IGs | 2024 January Ballot |
Complete STU 2 reconciliation and submit publication request for all three IGs | 2024 May-June |
Normative ballot for all three IGs | 2026 January Ballot |
Complete normative reconciliation and submit publication request for all three IGs | 2026 May-June |
Project End Date (all objectives have been met) | 2026 June |
3.f. Common Names / Keywords / Aliases
Validated Healthcare Directory, Payer Directory, Provider Directory, Endpoint Directory |
3.g. Lineage
Utilizes the work done for the Validated Healthcare Directory and the PDex PlanNet FHIR IGs. |
3.h. Project Dependencies
Project ID: 1345 Validated Healthcare Directory Project ID: 1489 Payer Data Exchange |
3.i. HL7-Managed Project Document Repository Location
Projects must adhere to the TSC's guidelines (which were approved on 2016-04-04 and summarized in Appendix A). A template to create a Project Page on the HL7 Wiki is available at: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Template:Project_Page. |
To be determined |
National Healthcare Directory |
3.j. Backwards Compatibility
Are the items being produced by this project backward compatible? | Yes | No | Unknown | X | N/A | |||
If you check 'Yes' please indicate the earliest prior release and/or version to which the compatibility applies: | ||||||||
For V3, are you using the current data types? (Refer to TSC position statement on new projects using R2B for more information on the current V3 data types) | Yes | No | Unknown | N/A | ||||
If you check no, please explain the reason: | ||||||||
If desired, enter additional information regarding Backwards Compatibility. |
3.k. External Vocabularies
Will this project include/reference external vocabularies? | X | Yes | No | Unknown | N/A | |||
Healthcare Taxonomy, TBD based on scope |
4. Products (check all that apply)
Arden Syntax | V2 Messages – Administrative | ||
Clinical Information Modeling Initiative (CIMI) | V2 Messages - Clinical | ||
Clinical Context Object Workgroup (CCOW) | V2 Messages - Departmental | ||
Domain Analysis Model (DAM) | V2 Messages – Infrastructure | ||
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Functional Profile | V3 Domain Information Model (DIM / DMIM) | ||
X | FHIR Extensions | V3 Documents – Administrative (e.g. SPL) | |
X | FHIR Implementation Guide (enter FHIR product version below) | V3 Documents – Clinical (e.g. CDA) | |
X | FHIR Profiles (enter FHIR product version below) | V3 Documents - Knowledge | |
FHIR Resources | V3 Foundation – RIM | ||
X | Guidance (e.g. Companion Guide, Cookbook, etc) | V3 Foundation – Vocab Domains & Value Sets | |
Logical Model | V3 Messages - Administrative | ||
New/Modified/HL7 Policy/Procedure/Process | V3 Messages - Clinical | ||
New Product Definition (please define below) | V3 Messages - Departmental | ||
New Product Family (please define below) | V3 Messages - Infrastructure | ||
Non Product Project - (Educ. Marketing, Elec. Services, etc.) | V3 Rules - GELLO | ||
White Paper | V3 Services – Java Services (ITS Work Group) | ||
Creating/Using a tool not listed in the HL7 Tool Inventory | V3 Services – Web Services (SOA) |
If you checked New Product Definition or New Product Family, please define below: |
For FHIR IGs and FHIR Profiles, what product version(s) will the profiles apply to? R4 |
5. Project Intent (check all that apply)
Create new standard | Supplement to a current standard | ||||||||
Revise current standard (see text box below) | X | Implementation Guide (IG) will be created/modified | |||||||
Reaffirmation of a standard | Project is adopting/endorsing an externally developed IG: | ||||||||
New/Modified HL7 Policy/Procedure/Process | Specify external organization in Sec. 6 below; | ||||||||
Externally developed IG is to be (select one): | |||||||||
White Paper (select one): | Adopted - OR - | ? | Endorsed | ||||||
Balloted Informative OR | Non-balloted WG White Paper | N/A (Project not directly related to an HL7 Standard) | |||||||
If revising a current standard, indicate the following: | |
- Name of the standard being revised: | |
- Date it was published (or request for publication, or ANSI designation date) | |
- Rationale for revision | |
- The relationship between the new standard and the current standard (is it designed to replace the current standard, a supplement to the current standard, etc.) |
5.a. Ballot Type (check all that apply)
X | Comment (aka Comment-Only) | Joint Ballot (with other SDOs) | ||||
Informative | N/A (project won’t go through ballot) | |||||
X | STU to Normative - OR - | Normative (no STU) | ||||
If necessary, add any additional ballot information here. If artifacts will be jointly balloted with other SDOs, list the other groups. |
5.b. Joint Copyright
Check this box if you will be pursuing a joint copyright. Note that when this box is checked, a Joint Copyright Letter of Agreement must be submitted to the TSC in order for the PSS to receive TSC approval.
Joint Copyrighted Material will be produced? | Yes | X | No |
6. Project Logistics
6.a. External Project Collaboration
Include SDOs or other external entities you are collaborating with, including government agencies as well as any industry outreach. Indicate the nature and status of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) if applicable. | ||||
For projects that have some of their content already developed: | ||||
How much content for this project is already developed? | based on projects 1345 and 1489 | |||
Was the content externally developed ? : | N | |||
Is this a hosted (externally funded) project? (not asking for amount just if funded) | Y | Yes | No |
6.b. Realm
Universal | - OR - | X | Realm Specific | |
| Check here if this standard balloted or was previously approved as realm specific standard | |||
US | Enter “U.S.” or name of HL7 affiliate(s) here. Provide explanation/justification of realm selection. For projects producing deliverables applicable to multiple realms, document those details here. For Investigative projects, indicate if the project is planned to be Realm Specific or Universal, if known. Work Groups are encouraged designating project a Universal project initially, and discover which Realms can contribute to the work effort during the discovery phase of the project. Note: This status is subject to change during the investigative process. |
6.c. Stakeholders / Vendors / Providers
This section must be completed for projects containing items expected to be ANSI approved, as it is an ANSI requirement for all ballots
| Stakeholders |
| Vendors |
| Providers | |
X | Clinical and Public Health Laboratories |
| Pharmaceutical | X | Clinical and Public Health Laboratories | |
X | Immunization Registries | X | EHR, PHR | X | Emergency Services | |
X | Quality Reporting Agencies |
| Equipment | X | Local and State Departments of Health | |
X | Regulatory Agency | X | Health Care IT | X | Medical Imaging Service | |
| Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) | X | Clinical Decision Support Systems | X | Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health) | |
X | Payors | X | Lab | X | Other (specify in text box below) | |
| Other (specify in text box below) | X | HIS |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
| Other (specify below) |
| ||
|
| N/A |
|
| ||
Potentially any organization or individual associated with the delivery or provisioning of healthcare (except for patients and non-licensed care givers) | ||||||
6.d. Project Approval Dates
Click here to go to HL7 Project Scope Statement Instructions#Appendix A for more information regarding this section.
Approvals are by simple majority vote of the approving body
Sponsoring Work Group Approval Date: vote 5-0-0 | WG Approval Date | 2020-12-09 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative review – in parallel with Work Group Approval | ||||||||||||||||
Co-Sponsor Group Approval Date vote 14-0-0 | Payer/Provider Information Exchange | 2021-02-02 | ||||||||||||||
Co-Sponsor Group Approval Date vote 19-0-1 | Financial Management | 2021-02-09 | ||||||||||||||
Family Management Group Approval Date(s) | ||||||||||||||||
CIMI Projects: CIMI Management Group | CIMI MG Approval Date | |||||||||||||||
CDA Projects: CDA Management Group | CDA MG Approval Date | |||||||||||||||
FHIR Projects: FHIR Management Group | FMG Approval Date | 2021-02-17 | ||||||||||||||
V2/Publishing Projects: V2 Management Group | V2 MG Approval Date | |||||||||||||||
US Realm Projects: US Realm Steering Committee Approval | USRSC Approval Date | 2021-02-23 | ||||||||||||||
Affiliate Specific Projects: Affiliate Approval Date | Affiliate Approval Date | |||||||||||||||
Submit PSS to Steering Division after all of the above approvals are received | ||||||||||||||||
Steering Division (of Primary Sponsor WG) Approval Date: | SD Approval Date CCYY-MM-DD | 2021-04-01 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
ARB and Steering Division approval may be in parallel | ||||||||||||||||
Architectural Review Board Approval Date: (required for externally developed content) | ARB Approval Date | |||||||||||||||
TSC Approval | ||||||||||||||||
If applicable, TSC has received a Joint Copyright/Distribution Agreement (containing the verbiage outlined within the SOU), |
| |||||||||||||||
Technical Steering Committee Approval Date: | TSC Approval Date |
1 Comment
Virginia Lorenzi
If organizations are submitting endpoints to the directory and other issuing organizations are submitting them, how will differences be reconciled? Also, organizations submitting endpoint might lag behind issuing organizations because it is a manual process. I have also seen organizations submit endpoints through their vendor and also to the NPPES directory. I worry that the directory entries received directly from organizations will be out of data and collide with the issuers entries.