Confluence will be upgraded on January 30th, 2020 beginning at 6 AM EST. Estimated downtime is 2 hrs. Please email webmaster@hl7.org with any questions.

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

1. Project Name  and ID

Project Name:Reaffirmation of HL7 Version 3 Standard: Transport Specifications - MLLP

Project ID:1386

 

Date : 

 

Date : 

2. Sponsoring Group(s) / Project Team

2.a.Primary Sponsor/Work Group:
(1 (And Only 1) Allowed)

Infrastructure and Messaging

2.b. Co-sponsor Work Group(s)

(Enter co-sponsor approval dates in Section 6.c Project Approval Dates)

Implementable Technology Specifications

Indicate the level of involvement that the co-sponsor will have for this project:

  •  Request formal content review prior to ballot

 

  •  Request periodic project updates. Specify period: 

<Monthly, at WGMs, etc.>

  •  Other Involvement. Specify details here: 

<other involvement>

2.c Project Team

Project facilitator (1Mandatory)

Anthony Julian

Other interested parties and their roles

<Interested Party & Role>

Multi-disciplinary project team (recommended)

 

       Modeling facilitator

<Facilitator>

       Publishing facilitator

<Facilitator>

       Vocabulary facilitator

<Facilitator>

       Domain expert rep

 

       Business requirement analyst

 

       Conformance facilitator (for IG projects)

 

       Other facilitators (SOA, etc)

 

 

 

Implementers (2 Mandatory for STU projects)

FHIR Project Note: The implementer requirement will be handled by the “balloting” project.  Therefore work groups do not fill out the above section.  However, feel free to list implementers specific to your work group’s resources if you know of any.

1) 

2)

  1. Project Definition

2.a.    Project Scope

Reaffirm HL7 Version 3 Standard: Transport Specifications - MLLP

2.b.   Project Need

The purpose of the MLLP Protocol (Minimum Lower Layer Protocol) is to provide both a minimalistic Open Systems Interconnection (OSI)-session layer framing protocol as well as a minimalistic reliable transport protocol. If security is an issue, additional protocols or technologies will have to be layered on top of MLLP to achieve these goals.


2.c.    Security Risks

Will this project produce executable(s), for example, schemas, transforms, style sheets, executable program, etc.  If so the project must review and document security risks.

 

 

Yes

 

X

No

 

 

Unknown


2.d.   External Drivers

Describe any external schedules or calendars which may not be known outside of the project team that are driving target dates for this project.


2.e.    Project Objectives / Deliverables / Target Dates

 

Target Date

 Submit for Normative Ballot

2018 May Ballot

 Complete Normative Reconciliation

2018 May WGM

 Submit Publication Request

2018 Jun

Receive ANSI Approval

2018 Jun

Project End Date (all objectives have been met)

Note:  For PSS-Lite/Investigative Project, End date must be no more than two WGM cycles, e.g. project initiated at January WGM must complete investigation by September WGM.

2018 Jun


2.f.       Common Names / Keywords / Aliases

"V3 Minimal Lower Layer Protocol (MLLP), Release 2", "Reaffirmation of the HL7 Version 3 Standard: Transport Specification - MLLP, Release 2", Transport Spec MLLP, MLLP

2.g.   Lineage

N/A


2.h.   Project Dependencies

N/A

2.i.       Project Document Repository Location

Projects must adhere to the TSC's guidelines (which were approved on 2016-04-04 and summarized in Appendix A).

Architecture Review Board

2.j.       Backwards Compatibility

Are the items being produced by this project backward compatible?

 

 

Yes

 

 

No

 

 

Unknown

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

For V3, are you using the current data types? 

(Refer to TSC position statement on new projects using R2B for more information on the current V3 data types)

 

 

Yes

 

 

No

 

 

Unknown

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

If you check 'No' please explain the reason:

If desired, enter additional information regarding Backwards Compatibility.


2.k.    External Vocabularies

Will this project include/reference external vocabularies?

 

 

Yes

 

 

No

 

 

Unknown

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

If yes, please list the vocabularies:

 

  1. Products (check all that apply)

 

Non Product Project - (Educ. Marketing, Elec. Services, etc.)

 

 

V3 Domain Information Model (DIM / DMIM)

 

Arden Syntax

 

 

V3 Documents – Administrative (e.g. SPL)

 

Clinical Context Object Workgroup (CCOW)

 

 

V3 Documents – Clinical (e.g. CDA)

 

Domain Analysis Model (DAM)

 

 

V3 Documents - Knowledge

 

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Functional Profile

 

 

V3 Foundation – RIM

 

Logical Model

 

 

V3 Foundation – Vocab Domains & Value Sets

 

V2 Messages – Administrative

 

 

V3 Messages - Administrative

 

V2 Messages - Clinical

 

 

V3 Messages - Clinical

 

V2 Messages - Departmental

 

 

V3 Messages - Departmental

X

V2 Messages – Infrastructure

 

X

V3 Messages - Infrastructure

 

FHIR Implementation Guide

 

 

V3 Rules - GELLO

 

FHIR Profiles

 

 

V3 Services – Java Services (ITS Work Group)

 

FHIR Resources

 

 

V3 Services – Web Services (SOA)

 

New/Modified/HL7 Policy/Procedure/Process

 

 

White Paper

 

New Product Definition

 

 

 

 

New Product Family

 

 

 

If you checked New Product Definition or New Product Family, please define below:

 

  1. Project Intent (check all that apply)

 

Create new standard

 

 

Supplement to a current standard

 

Revise current standard (see text box below)

 

 

Implementation Guide (IG) will be created/modified

X

Reaffirmation of a standard

 

 

Project is adopting/endorsing an externally developed IG:

 

New/Modified HL7 Policy/Procedure/Process

 

 

Specify external organization in Sec. 6 below;

 

Withdraw an Informative Document

 

 

Externally developed IG is to be (select one):

 

White Paper (select one):

 

 

Adopted  - OR -

 

Endorsed

 

 

Balloted Informative OR

 

Non-balloted WG White Paper

 

 

N/A  (Project not directly related to an HL7 Standard)

          

If revising a current standard, indicate the following:

-   Name of the standard being revised

-   Date it was published (or request for publication, or ANSI designation date)

-   Rationale for revision

-   The relationship between the new standard and the current standard (is it designed to replace the current standard, a supplement to the current standard, etc.)


4.a.    Ballot Type (check all that apply)

 

Comment (aka Comment-Only)

 

 

Joint Ballot (with other SDOs)

 

Informative

 

 

N/A  (project won’t go through ballot)

 

STU to Normative     - OR -

X

Normative (no STU)

 

 

 

       
If necessary, add any additional ballot information here.  If artifacts will be jointly balloted with other SDOs, list the other groups.

4.b.   Joint Copyright

Check this box if you will be pursuing a joint copyright.  Note that when this box is checked, a Joint Copyright Letter of Agreement must be submitted to the TSC in order for the PSS to receive TSC approval.

Joint Copyrighted Material will be produced?

 

 

Yes

 

X

No

 

 

  1. Project Logistics

5.a.    External Project Collaboration

Include SDOs or other external entities you are collaborating with, including government agencies as well as any industry outreach.  Indicate the nature and status of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) if applicable.

For projects that have some of their content already developed:

How much content for this project is already developed?

Indicate % here

Was the content externally developed (Y/N)? 

If Yes, list developers

Is this a hosted (externally funded) project? 
(not asking for amount just if funded)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

No

 

5.b.   Realm

X

Universal     - OR -

 

 

Realm Specific

 

 

 

Check here if this standard balloted or was previously approved as realm specific standard

 

Enter “U.S.” or name of HL7 affiliate(s) here.  For projects producing deliverables applicable to multiple realms, document those details here.

For Investigative projects, indicate if the project is planned to be Realm Specific or Universal, if known. Work Groups are encouraged designating project a Universal project initially, and discover which Realms can contribute to the work effort during the discovery phase of the project.  Note: This status is subject to change during the investigative process. 


5.c.    Project Approval Dates

Affiliate Approval Date (for Affiliate Specific Projects):

“N/A”

US Realm Steering Committee Approval Date
(for US Realm Specific Projects):

 “N/A”

Sponsoring Work Group Approval Date:

WG Approval Date 2018-01-16

Co-Sponsor Group Approval Date

(Copy this entire row for each co-sponsor; indicate the specific cosponsor that issued approval)

Co-Sponsor Approval Date CCYY-MM-DD

FHIR Project: FHIR Management Group Approval Date:

“N/A”

Architectural Review Board Approval Date:

 “N/A”

Steering Division Approval Date :

SD Approval Date 2018-01-29

Last Work Group Health:

 

 Green

 

 Yellow

 

 Red

PBS Metrics and Work Group Health Reviewed? (required for SD Approval if not green)

 

 Yes

 

 No

Technical Steering Committee Approval Date:

TSC Approval Date CCYY-MM-DD

TSC has received a Copyright/Distribution Agreement (containing the verbiage outlined within the SOU), signed by both parties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

No

 

 N/A

          

 

5.d