Attendees
Name | Attendance |
---|---|
Melva Peters (Chair) | x |
Chuck Meyer | x |
Jean Duteau | x |
Hans Buitendijk | x |
Nancy Orvis | |
Peter Jordan | x |
Robert Stegwee | x |
Ed Hammond | |
Karen van Hentenryck | x |
Virginia Lorenzi |
Agenda
- Revision Cycle 2009
- Next Meeting
Meeting Notes
Revision Cycle 2009
Key | Summary | Description | Notes |
[Karen Van Hentenryck] Following a review of HL ER 2020 by ANSI, it was pointed out that the use of a comment-only ballot for reaffirmation (§03.04.01) appeared to lack the rigor expected for such actions. Editorial note: Per §04.03.03, revisions due to ANSI review or audit shall be considered adopted proposed revisions and processed accordingly. | |||
[Chuck Meyer] As the TSC pointed out in their peer review comment on resolving motions via email (RC2005) with the transition to Confluence/JIRA very few groups still use email to resolve issues. I suggest the GOM be revised to address the use of collaborative tools to resolve motions using parliamentary rules of order. | |||
Need to update GOM with Code of Conduct that was approved by the Board on 2020-08-24. From GCR-211: Update GOM to include either a reference to the Diversity statement or the full statement Editorial note: Current section 04 includes reference to Diversity Policy. | |||
HTA [Julie James] RC2005 peer review comments to GCR-141 stated that in the process of interacting with external terminology management organizations the topic of SOU/MOU often arises. Therefore, the HTA requests that this be taken into consideration and, if possible, mentioned in the context of such relationships. | |||
Change Section 08.08.02: "Nominees for HL7 Director must be current individual members or designated voting representatives of current Organizational members and should have held leadership positions at the Work Group, council, and/or committee level or have comparable experience." | |||
GCR-147 | |||
GCR-200 |
- TSC changes
- in progress
- How to get review on proposed changes once adopted by EC
- can use a different process for gathering feedback from the membership
- Town Hall meeting via Zoom - perhaps a couple of meetings over a couple of days
- Will present as a GOC process - with a panel from the TSC Restructuring Task Force
- this is about the GOM changes and not about the restructuring - need to be clear about the purpose/scope
- opportunity to communicate the changes further
- can use a different process for gathering feedback from the membership
- Peer Review
- Package to Karen by November 16th
- Package emailed by November 17 - December 17
- Next meeting
- Will schedule to review TSC changes
- Will schedule to review Peer Review comments
- January 7 - 3pm Eastern - 90 minutes