Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Chair:  @Paul Knapp

Scribe: @MaryKay McDaniel

Create Decision from template



Ballot Reconciliation


TrackerIDSummaryOutcome

Moved/

Seconder

VoteComment
17888

Coverage Requests should require mutual TLS (Joshua Mandel)


Was a shall, made a should. This a web centric protocol.

There is a discussion in the FHIR security module and came to the same conclusion.

Persuasive with ModAndy Gregorowicz / Mark Scrimshire15-0-0

Deferring to ITS, today 12/4/2018. Paul will bring up in call later today and will loop back to Andy G. Conflicts between hooks and the IG.

Paul Update from ITS: Not much discussion on the ITS call. Remind Paul on 12/18/2018, for next ITS call.

1/8/2019: should is appropriate.

18948

There needs to be additional configuration options suggested within the IG. - CRD #89 (Mary Kay McDaniel) None

18948 - There needs to be additional configuration options suggested within the IG

This item was discussed in both the Da Vinci Use Case Group as well as on the 11/20 FM call. However, I have received a report from Lloyd McKenzie which states that Negative Major ballot comments are not able to have a resolution of Considered for Future Use. Given that we changed the resolution on the 11/20 call, I feel we need to readdress the issue on tomorrow’s call.




Originally discussed 11/20/2018 on WGM call.


1/8/2019: Per Paul, this is an allowable ballot disposition. Need to touch base with TSC for confirmation. Will bring back to the group after WGM.







18972Add standard prefetch definitions for each hook - CRD #113 (Richard Ettema)Not Persuasive with Mod

Per Loyd McKenzie, there is no benefit in standardizing the prefetch document. Develop something that is nimble.

Everyone's end point will have a different name.

Deferring today. Group did not agree with no standardization. Concerned that the business side does not understand, have not been adequately educated with the potential outcomes. Templates/standardization seems to be needed. How do you test this?







18875Client and server roles aren't defined yet. More context at this point in the spec would be helpful - CRD #1 (Andrew Gregorowicz)Persuasive

Deferred for Andy input.
18878 Link CDS Service and HTTP Request to the relevant parts of the CDS Hooks specification - CRD #4 (Andrew Gregorowicz)Persuasive

Deferred for Andy input.
18880 Suggest that we state that “boolean” and “integer” conform to their specification in the FHIR base data types. - CRD #6 (Andrew Gregorowicz)Not Persuasive with Mod

Deferred for Andy input.
18881




18883 

Suggest this request for functionality to be added to prefetch be limited to CDS Hook Request context properties that are defined as FHIR Bundles - CRD #9 (Andrew Gregorowicz)

Not Persuasive

Deferred for Andy input.






18102 

Typo US DA Vinci CRD (Freida Hall)

Persuasive

Auto approved. no need to vote within WG.
18107 

Typo CRD specification (Freida Hall)

Persuasive

Auto approved. no need to vote within WG.
18119

Typo Section 3 CRD (Freida Hall)

Persuasive

Auto approved. no need to vote within WG.
18877 

CDS Hooks Page Correction - CRD #3 (Andrew Gregorowicz)

Persuasive

1/16/2019, see katie's notes
18878 

Link CDS Service and HTTP Request to the relevant parts of the CDS Hooks specification - CRD #4 (Andrew Gregorowicz)

Persuasive

1/16/2019, see katie's notes
18880

Suggest that we state that “boolean” and “integer” conform to their specification in the FHIR base data types. - CRD #6 (Andrew Gregorowicz)

Not Persuasive with Mod

1/16/2019, see katie's notes
18883 

Suggest this request for functionality to be added to prefetch be limited to CDS Hook Request context properties that are defined as FHIR Bundles - CRD #9 (Andrew Gregorowicz)

Not Persuasive

1/16/2019. Hold for Andy
18892 

SMART on FHIR support not fully specified - CRD #18 (Corey Spears)

None

1/16/2019, see katie's notes
18914 

Provide moe context to the context that enables the client app to choose the level of detail - CRD #55 (Hans Buitendijk)

None

1/16/2019, see katie's notes
18963 

Proposed hooks are not on github - CRD #104 (Mary Kay McDaniel)

Persuasive

1/16/2019, see katie's notes
18975 

Expand section 2.1.2 to describe in more detail why/how the CDS Hooks is intended to be used to support Coverage Requirements Discovery - CRD #116 (Walter Suarez)

None

1/16/2019, see katie's notes


 

  • Ballot Reconciliation - CRD, Da Vinci Project work.
 

Supporting Documents

Outline Reference

Supporting Document

Minute Approval


Action items