• Upcoming block vote deferred
  • Get outstanding Personal Health Device IG JIRAs resolved
  • Device Module Discussions, continued


John Garguilo, Ralf Herzog, Stefan Karl, Koichiro Matsumoto, Joe Quinn, Elliot Siver, Marti Velezis

Meeting Notes

  1. Looked again at  FHIR-33648 - Getting issue details... STATUS . Marti looking for more clarity on the "approved jurisdiction": how it relates to related R5 DeviceDefinition field. This field in Device instances comes from the SDC group (not the HL7 SDC work, the IEEE-11072 Service-oriented Device Connectivity device point-of-care integration set of standards, better known in IHE and HL7 as SDPi - Service-oriented Device Point-of-Care Integration). An extension will be needed to accommodate the concept in R4. A goal in clarifying this is to minimize conceptual friction in R5, where DeviceDefinition resource is actively in play. Need to consult with subject matter experts in the related IEEE standards including Björn Andersen,and Kathrin Riech. Also Marti wished to discuss previous emails / Tulip messages from Todd Cooper 
  2. Extension issue: is there a problem with complex / multiple extensions? Consensus: no, it can be handled (to be discussed later )


Module: Devices

  • No labels