Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Status

APPROVED

e-Vote Close Date

 

Affirm-Negative-Abstain8-0-0
Date Approved

 

Work GroupCQI
Project Insight IDTBD
Work Groups that submitted votes

Anesthesia

CDS

Clinical Genomics

CIC

CQI

Learning Health System

Patient Care

Pharmacy

Work Groups that did not submit votes

BR&R

CBCP

Emergency Care

Devices

Public Health



  • For each Work Group, choose Affirmative, Negative, Abstain

  • If you are voting for a WG AND are also a co-chair for another WG in the CSD, please include a comment to indicate which WG you are voting on behalf of.

  • Use the  in the comments section to add comments to the vote.

  • Feel free to comment inline on Confluence documents*.

  • Negatives that do NOT have a comment will be considered abstain. Please register your vote below.

PSS: Outcome Criteria Framework Implementation Guide


eVote Closes:  

Link to PSS: Outcome Criteria Framework Implementation Guide

PBS Metrics: Green

Project Approval Request

Choices Your Vote Current Result: (8 Total Votes) Comments
abstain Project Approval Request
0 Votes , 0%
affirmative: for CIC WG
affirmative: LHS WG
affirmative: Anesthesia
affirmative Project Approval Request
8 Votes , 100%
negative (with comment) Project Approval Request
0 Votes , 0%



*  Refer to Can I add comments without editing the page? for directions.

1 Comment

  1. Section 3a - Project Scope:

    3] Demonstrate this process end to end through the development of a set of examples, beginning with Depression.  [The example will be used to demonstrate the use of the Framework and not to ballot the content.]

    Question/suggestion:

    Should the project scope also include testing the validity of the Framework? e.g. whether it can accurately and reliably represent all quality measure constructs for conditions?

    It is important that the validity and reliability of such framework be ascertained especially it is a framework for representing quality constructs