Chair and Scribe: Floyd Eisenberg
Minutes from last call: OMOP Quality Measurement 23 March 2022
Recording of this call (access requires passcode):
- https://us02web.zoom.us/rec/share/3YTqkZh9iyRiXNUEbaqC6no1j4LVmskf45Lp6awoSx2zL6OStIevxYRAOICPUh9V.VxtgZipxBpny8dSS
- Passcode: ?gqX+8$h
The FHIR-OMOP WG- subgroups are as follows:
- Data Model Harmonization
- Data Quality Measurements
- Terminologies
- Oncology
Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83645856405?pwd=OHJRdVVtb3BBQTdVaWp5UlBXUEdvUT09
| Agenda Topic | Discussion Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| New Discussion Topics/Updates: | ||
| Overview - Presentation from OMOP All-Hands Meeting March 28, 2022: FHIR_OMOP_All Hands_28March2022_dQM.pptx | Floyd reviewed the slides from the OMOP All-Hands call. Paul Denning noted the second use case, OMOP to FHIR cohort with unknown patient population, might also have a FHIR to OMOP direction. Others confirm the asynchronous unknown patient cohort use case may be bidirectional. | |
Update discussion regarding Jack Brewster's (IQVIA) presentation for automatically importing VSAC value sets into OMOP. | Davera noted that Hopkins automated the front end of the process - pull VSAC value sets into the NCC enclave, they do it in bulk using the NLM API. That process and the one presented by Jack Brewster last meeting may help develop a common approach. There is still work to be done. It was done for NCC and is not FHIR-involved. There is a call to the NLM FHIR API. It is something this group might take on. There is no current activity taking an OMOP value set and converting to a VSAC value set - VSAC doesn't have OMOP vocabulary currently. And, there is no business arrangement between OHDSI and NLM that would need to be established to make this work. Globally, Darwin EU is creating momentum for a repository for value sets - doesn't have the same infrastructure as VSAC but has a similar inventory. The machinery is not currently optimized but it can be explored and evaluated as a demonstration. Sebastiaan is working on the European use case - this discussion has been very US focused. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/about-us/how-we-work/big-data/data-analysis-real-world-interrogation-network-darwin-eu. The European community is aligned with the ICHOM outcomes work: ICHOM IG https://confluence.hl7.org/display/FHIR/ICHOM+Breast+Cancer+PCOM+FHIR+IG https://ecqi.healthit.gov/ecqm/ep/2022/cms125v10. | |
Discussion of OMOP-Atlas to FHIR-CQL conversion - what are next steps? | Discussion about creating content for a track in the Digital Quality Summit. Davera asked if there might be an ability to present in the CMS Connectathon in July. CMS 2022 - 07 FHIR Connectathon 3 | |
Discussion about potential synthetic patient set in (a) FHIR, (b) OMOP | No new discussion. | |
Follow up next steps from last call - validate actions needed: Reminder from last call regarding COVID Criteria for cohort: https://github.com/National-COVID-Cohort-Collaborative/Phenotype_Data_Acquisition/wiki/Latest-Phenotype; Describe requirements for the various components of the architecture - Seeking input from WG members: | ||
Terminology:
| Further detail would be use-case specific. Content requirements include characteristics to match the use case. Do we specify the use case and then build the data? If we assume the demonstration is the COVID and matched control cohorts - we would need ICD-10 on the terminology server (reference terminology in synthetic data) and assure the synthetic data meet the phenotype expression. Content Requirements for COVID Use case: Reference terminologies on servers: ICD10CM, SNOMED CT, LOINC, CVX Synthetic cohort data matching N3C phenotype: COVID positive test results Comorbid conditions Possible: Vaccine admin records | |
Expression:
| Use-case specific | |
Data Query and Response:
| ||
Next Steps from March 9:
| ||
| New Next Steps: | Davera and Kristin will fill in the infrastructure requirements for the last 3 row for discussion in future calls. The next call, April 20 will be 30 minutes for OMOP-dQM and the remaining 30 minutes will address May FHIR Connectathon planning. The May 4 meeting will be cancelled as it is during the May HL7 FHIR Connectathon. The next call after April 20 will be May 18, 2022. | |
| Adjournment | Adjourned at 10:52 AM ET | |
Attendees
| Attendee | Attendee's Organization | Attendee's email | Present | |
| 1 | Abdullah Rafiqi | ESAC | yes | |
| 2 | ClinicalArchitecture | |||
| 3 | NCQA | |||
| 4 | Ben Hamlin | NCQA | yes | |
| 5 | Bryan Laraway | |||
| 6 | Alphora | |||
| 7 | ||||
| 8 | Johns Hopkins | dgabrie4@jh.edu | yes | |
| 9 | Dipti Gandhi | yes | ||
| 10 | Dorothy Lee | NCQA | ||
| 11 | Edward Smith | |||
| 12 | Esther Ndemo | yes | ||
| 13 | Evan Patrick Minty | |||
| 14 | Floyd Eisenberg | iParsimony, LLC | ||
| 15 | ESAC | |||
| 16 | Jack Brewster | IQVIA | ||
| 17 | James Brash | |||
| 18 | Jamie Smith | |||
| 19 | ||||
| 20 | John David Evans | |||
| 21 | JP | yes | ||
| 22 | Julia Dawson | yes | ||
| 23 | yes | |||
| 24 | Justin McKelvy | |||
| 25 | Kristin Kostka | yes | ||
| 26 | Latasha Estrada | |||
| 27 | Luis Alaniz | |||
| 28 | ||||
| 29 | NCQA | |||
| 30 | Ming Dunajick | |||
| 31 | ||||
| 32 | yes | |||
| 33 | ||||
| 34 | yes | |||
| 35 | ||||
| 36 | yes | |||
| 37 | Raju Hemadri | |||
| 38 | Raquel Belarmino | yes | ||
| 39 | ||||
| 40 | @Sandra Siami | |||
| 41 | Sebastian van Sandijk | Odysseus | yes | |
| 42 | Shaun Shakib | |||
| 43 | Telligen | |||
| 44 | MedStar Health | |||
| 45 | Vickie Reyes (GC) | |||
| 46 | Yan Heras | yes | ||
| 47 | yes | |||
| 48 | Zhen Lin | |||
| 49 | JD Liddil | M2GEN | james.liddil@m2gen.com |